Lichtenburg Nut Company Business Plan — Risk Analysis

Aflatoxin events, groundnut price and supply, listing risk and the cash absorbed through the ramp, with trigger points.

Section 19 of 37

Risk Analysis

Jump to section
Aflatoxin exceedance and anchor-contract loss are the two risks that can destroy the business
Figure 1. Aflatoxin exceedance and anchor-contract loss are the two risks that can destroy the business

18.1 Prioritised risk register

Table 43. Prioritised risk register with mitigation and ownership

ID

Risk

P

I

Rating

Mitigation

Owner

R1

Aflatoxin exceedance reaching the market, triggering a recall

Med-High

Severe

Critical

Nine-point control architecture (Section 14); internal action limit of 6 ppb against a 10 ppb legal limit; positive release; recall insurance; quarterly mock recalls

Quality Manager

R2

Loss of the anchor private label contract

Medium

Severe

Critical

Multi-year agreement with notice and transition protection; industrial pipeline developed from month 1; own brand launched by month 24 to reduce dependence

Commercial Manager

R3

Groundnut crop failure or price spike

High

Major

Critical

75% of kernels contracted pre-season; four months of storage cover; 25% spot allocation; quality-linked grower pricing to secure delivery priority. No hedging instrument exists.

Supply Chain Manager

R4

Slower volume ramp than plan

Med-High

Major

High

R40m revolving facility absorbs a shortfall of up to about 15%; capital phased so that Phases 2 and 3 can be deferred; switching analysis shows EBITDA survives a 34% shortfall

Managing Director

R5

Retailer margin, rebate and settlement pressure

High

Moderate

High

Board-approved floor price; mix shift toward industrial and own brand; contractual protection within tender periods

Commercial Manager

R6

Incumbent price response resetting category price points

Medium

Major

High

Compete on audit outcome rather than price; accept lower utilisation over unprofitable volume

Board

R7

dtic APSS grant not awarded

Medium

Moderate

Medium

Application submitted and adjudicated before financial close as a condition precedent; downside case models half the grant and the stress case none

Finance Director

R8

Municipal electricity or water interruption

Med-High

Moderate

Medium

250 kWp solar, standby generation sized to chilling and laboratory loads, 48 hours of water storage, dual-fuel roaster

Operations Manager

R9

Interest rate increase

Medium

Moderate

Medium

A 200 bp increase adds roughly R2m a year to finance cost; the base case is priced at a 10.50% prime rate

Finance Director

R10

Reversal or dilution of the 20% import duty

Low

Major

Medium

Monitor the ITAC review cycle; the business must be viable at prices 6% to 9% below plan, which the switching analysis indicates it marginally is

Managing Director

R11

Failure to recruit or retain the executive team

Low-Med

Moderate

Medium

Management equity at 10% plus a 5% incentive scheme; relocation support; appointments as a condition precedent

Board

R12

Withdrawal or non-renewal of the working capital facility

Low

Severe

Medium

Annual renewal negotiated ahead of the intake season; covenant headroom monitored monthly; alternative facility mandated as a contingency

Finance Director

R13

Foreign exchange exposure on imported equipment

Medium

Moderate

Medium

Forward cover taken on equipment orders at the time of placement; approximately 55% of Phase 1 plant is imported

Finance Director

R14

Construction cost overrun or delay

Medium

Moderate

Medium

7% contingency within Phase 1; fixed-price installation contracts where available; the downside case models a 7% capital overrun

Operations Manager

18.2 Residual risk after mitigation