Magalies Quarry Business Plan — Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis

What moves the outcome: volume, realised price, haulage distance and plant availability, with scenarios.

Section 21 of 26

Scenario and Sensitivity Analysis

Jump to section

The base case rewards equity; the downside impairs it. Both are shown, because an investment committee needs the full distribution, not just the mean.

Scenarios

Year-5 EBITDA and exit equity value by scenario
Figure 1. Year-5 EBITDA and exit equity value by scenario.

Scenario

Y5 EBITDA

Y5 margin

Min cash

Exit equity

Equity IRR

Downside

R21.8m

19%

R-70.8m

R-29.8m

n/a

Base

R49.5m

32%

R6.0m

R220.8m

23%

Upside

R61.2m

37%

R6.0m

R336.7m

38%

Downside disclosure

In the sustained downside (volume ~15% lower, prices ~7% lower, costs ~6% higher), Year-5 EBITDA falls to R21.8m, the R45m revolver is fully drawn and a further liquidity shortfall of roughly R71m emerges, and exit equity turns negative at R-29.8m. The investment therefore requires shareholders able to provide a standby equity cure. This is the single most important caveat in the memorandum and is stated plainly rather than smoothed away.

Sensitivity

Sensitivity of Year-5 exit equity value to key drivers
Figure 2. Sensitivity of Year-5 exit equity value to key drivers.

Exit equity is most sensitive to selling price, then volume, with operating cost a secondary driver. A 10% price decline roughly halves exit equity, underscoring that disciplined, delivered-cost-based pricing is the key value lever.

Break-even

Break-even analysis (Year-3 cost economics)
Figure 3. Break-even analysis (Year-3 cost economics).

Cash break-even is around 431 kt and full-cost break-even (including depreciation and finance cost) around 604 kt, reached by about Year 3. The margin of safety is thin at Year 3 and widens materially as volumes rise toward nameplate.