Switchpoint Payments Business Plan — Key Performance Indicators

The merchant additions, volume per merchant, net take rate and churn indicators reported monthly, with targets.

Key Performance Indicators

Jump to section

The following are the measures on which this business should be governed. Two of them — account-to-account volume per trade merchant and months of runway at current burn — are reported to the board monthly from the first month of trading, because both feed triggers with short fuses.

Indicator

Definition

Target

Why it matters

Account-to-account volume per trade merchant

Monthly rail volume divided by live trade merchants

R1 250 000 a month

The load-bearing assumption of the entire plan. Below 70% of plan by month 18 triggers reassessment

Blended net take rate

Net revenue divided by total payment volume

64 basis points falling to 56

Volume growth actively dilutes price. Any valuation anchored on volume overstates the business

Card net take rate

Merchant discount rate less cost of payments

104 basis points falling to 93

25 basis points of further compression removes FY2031 EBITDA entirely

Trade LTV to CAC

36-month contribution divided by acquisition cost

1.9x rising to 3.2x

Below the 3.0x underwriting threshold until FY2031. The practice book subsidises it

Practice LTV to CAC

36-month contribution divided by acquisition cost

5.3x rising to 7.8x

The segment that funds the trade build-out. If it underperforms there is no internal source of funding

Months of runway at current burn

Closing cash divided by trailing three-month net burn

Above 9 months at all times

The seed funds 19 months. Month 10 is the hard trigger for the Series A

Partner-originated share of new merchants

Merchants originated by partners divided by total acquired

Rising with the channel

The mechanism by which trade acquisition cost falls from R46 000 to R27 500

Monthly logo churn by segment

Merchants lost divided by opening merchants

2.4% practice, 1.4% trade

Half a point of churn is worth R11.4m of FY2031 EBITDA

Cost to serve per merchant

Support, risk, monitoring and hosting divided by live merchants

R850 practice, R2 400 trade, declining 34%

An engineering assumption rather than a contractual saving

Settlement account reconciliation

Designated account balance against the settlement liability

Exact, daily

Settlement funds are not company money and must never appear in available cash

14.1 Reporting cadence and ownership

Measure

Cadence

Owner

Source

Account-to-account volume per trade merchant

Monthly from first go-live

Head of partnerships

Rail settlement data by merchant; feeds the month 18 trigger

Months of runway at current burn

Monthly

Chief executive to board

Closing cash divided by trailing three-month net burn; feeds the month 10 trigger

Blended net take rate

Monthly

Finance

Net revenue divided by total payment volume, reported beside volume, never alone

Card net take rate

Monthly

Finance

Merchant discount rate less cost of payments, by scheme and transaction type

Acquisition cost by segment

Quarterly

Head of partnerships

Fully loaded, including partner enablement and activation support

Monthly logo churn by segment

Monthly

Merchant operations

Merchants lost divided by opening merchants

Cost to serve per merchant

Quarterly

Chief technology officer

Support, risk, monitoring and hosting divided by live merchants; tests the automation assumption

Settlement account reconciliation

Daily

Risk and compliance

Designated account balance against the settlement liability. Must reconcile exactly

Two features of this table are deliberate. The attachment reading and the runway calculation are reported monthly from the first month rather than quarterly, because both feed triggers that expire — a month 18 strategic decision and a month 10 fundraising decision cannot be informed by data that arrives in month 20. And the cost to serve measure is owned by the chief technology officer rather than by finance, because the 34 per cent decline across the horizon is an engineering commitment rather than a budget line.