Highveld Detailing Business Plan — Financial Assumptions
Every volume, pricing, cost and funding assumption behind the model, stated for independent testing.
Section 22 of 38
Financial Assumptions
Jump to section
- 0. Basis of Preparation and Important Notice
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Investment Thesis
- 3. What Must Be True, and What Would Break the Thesis
- 4. Company, Structure and Governance
- 5. The Customer Problem and the Value Proposition
- 6. Service Portfolio, Pricing and Contribution
- 7. Industry Structure and Profitability
- 8. Market Sizing and the Addressable Opportunity
- 9. Customer Segments and Buying Behaviour
- 10. Competitive Landscape
- 11. Business Model and Revenue Architecture
- 12. Channel Economics: Where the Capital Should Go
- 13. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 14. Operating Model
- 15. People and Organisation
- 16. Strategic Plan
- 17. SWOT and Strategic Implications
- 18. Risk Analysis
- 19. ESG, Transformation and Development Impact
- 20. Implementation Roadmap
- 21. Financial Assumptions
- 22. Cost Structure and Operating Leverage
- 23. Projected Income Statement
- 24. Projected Balance Sheet
- 25. Projected Cash Flow
- 26. Capital Expenditure
- 27. Funding Requirement and Structure
- 28. Debt Serviceability
- 29. Break-even Analysis
- 30. Valuation and Investor Returns
- 31. Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
- 32. Key Performance Indicators and Management Dashboard
- 33. Exit Strategy
- 34. Conclusion and Recommendation
- A. Appendix A: Detailed Assumptions Register
- B. Appendix B: Roll-out Schedule
- C. Appendix C: Model Integrity Verification
Every number in this plan derives from the assumptions in this section. They are stated in full so that a reader who disagrees with one can locate its effect, and so that the sensitivity analysis in Section 31 can be read against a known base.
Macroeconomic and escalation assumptions
Table 38. Macroeconomic assumptions
|
Assumption |
Rate p.a. |
Comment |
|---|---|---|
|
Consumer price inflation |
5.0% |
Within the Reserve Bank target band |
|
Retail price escalation |
6.0% |
Above CPI; retail protection pricing has some power |
|
Contract price escalation |
5.0% |
Below wage escalation, a deliberately unfavourable assumption that compresses dealer margin over time |
|
Wage escalation |
6.8% |
Above CPI, reflecting sectoral determination movements and competition for skilled installers |
|
Consumables escalation |
6.3% |
Above CPI, reflecting the imported component of coating and film chemistry |
|
Rent escalation |
7.0% |
Standard commercial lease escalation |
|
Utilities escalation |
9.5% |
Well above CPI; partially hedged by solar generation |
|
Other cost escalation |
5.8% |
General overheads |
The gap between contract price escalation and wage escalation is the most important relationship in this table. Over five years it compounds into a meaningful compression of dealer channel margin, and it is the reason FY2032 EBITDA margin is in the low teens rather than the high teens.
Operating assumptions
Table 39. Studio, dealer unit and mobile unit operating assumptions
|
Assumption |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailing studio |
||
|
Volume bays / detail bays / protection bays |
3 / 2 / 3 |
Eight bays in total |
|
Operating days per month |
26 |
Six-day trading |
|
Volume bay throughput |
5.5 / bay / day |
Express valeting |
|
Detail bay throughput |
1.6 / bay / day |
Multi-stage detailing |
|
Protection bay slots |
13 / bay / month |
Coating and film application cycles |
|
Steady-state utilisation (volume / detail / protection) |
82% / 78% / 78% |
Achieved after the ramp period |
|
Ramp to steady state |
30%, 40%, 49%, 57%, 64%, 70%, 76%, 81%, 86%, 90%, 93%, 96%, 98%, 99%, 100% |
Successive months from opening |
|
Monthly rent / utilities / insurance / security |
R97 800 / R34 000 / R14 000 / R9 000 |
Per studio, FY2028 levels |
|
In-dealership unit |
||
|
Daily work mix (used / CPO / PDI / wash) |
7 / 3 / 4 / 12 |
Vehicles per day at a typical mid-size dealership |
|
Operating days per month |
22 |
Six-day operation |
|
Steady-state utilisation |
86% |
Allows for flow variability |
|
Ramp to steady state |
55%, 70%, 82%, 92%, 100% |
From mobilisation |
|
Employees per unit |
7 |
Detailers plus team leader |
|
Volume rebate to the dealer |
10% |
On gross contract value |
|
Equipment capital / mobilisation cost |
R320 000 / R145 000 |
Equipment redeployable; mobilisation expensed |
|
Mobile fleet unit |
||
|
Vehicles per day |
12 |
On-site valeting |
|
Operating days per month |
22 |
Weekday operation |
|
Steady-state utilisation |
84% |
Route and weather variability |
|
Staff per unit |
2 |
Two detailers per vehicle |
|
Vehicle and equipment capital |
R620 000 |
Fitted panel van with tank and plant |
|
Running cost per month |
R18 500 |
Fuel, maintenance, water and consumable transport |
Labour, working capital, tax and funding assumptions
Table 40. Labour productivity and establishment assumptions
|
Assumption |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Productive hours per employee per month (studio) |
195 |
Net of breaks, training, travel and non-productive time |
|
Productive hours per employee per month (dealer unit) |
165 |
Lower than studio: more idle time between vehicle arrivals |
|
Productive hours per employee per month (mobile) |
176 |
Higher: scheduled routes with less idle time |
|
Staffing buffer |
1.15 |
Cover for absence, leave and training |
|
Establishment floor |
60% |
Minimum crew retained at a unit regardless of volume — the reason costs cannot flex fully downward |
|
Team leader ratio |
1 per 6 detailers |
On-site supervision |
|
Area manager ratio |
1 per 10 embedded units |
The supervision layer that makes the dispersed model viable |
Table 41. Working capital, tax and funding assumptions
|
Assumption |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Working capital |
||
|
Debtor days — retail |
0 |
Settled at the point of service |
|
Debtor days — dealer |
52 |
Dealer group payment practice |
|
Debtor days — fleet |
38 |
Corporate settlement terms |
|
Inventory days — consumables |
42 |
Includes ninety days of film stock as a currency buffer |
|
Creditor days |
32 |
Supplier terms |
|
Accrual days on operating expenses |
18 |
Payroll and overhead accruals |
|
Tax |
||
|
Corporate income tax rate |
27% |
South African statutory rate |
|
Assessed loss utilisation cap |
80% |
Only this proportion of taxable income may be sheltered by brought-forward losses |
|
Funding |
||
|
Equity Tranche A / Tranche B |
R15.0m / R9.0m |
Months 1 and 15 |
|
Development finance term facility |
R9.0m |
10.50% over 84 months with a 36-month capital moratorium |
|
Asset finance facility |
R4.5m |
12.25% over 48 months |
|
Revolving working-capital facility |
R4.0m |
13.75%, drawn as required |
|
Minimum cash floor |
R1.5m |
Operating liquidity buffer maintained at all times |
An arrangement fee of 1.25% is charged on facility value and a commitment fee of 0.75% on undrawn balances; both are carried in the model.