Fish Master Premier Business Plan — Key Assumptions

Every production, price, cost, capital and funding assumption behind the model, stated so a funder can test each one independently.

Key Assumptions

Jump to section

On this page

16.1 Production and price
16.2 Capital, cost and funding
16.3 Assumptions most in need of independent verification

16.1 Production and price

Assumption	Year 1	Year 5	Basis
Harvest tonnage	25 t	150 t	Phased stocking as tanks are commissioned
Harvest weight	700 g	700 g	The size the premium fresh and live channel wants
Feed conversion ratio	1.85	1.52	Ramp of 1.85, 1.70, 1.60, 1.55, 1.52. Better than 1.4 is very difficult in practice
Feed price	R25.50/kg	R25.50/kg	Bulk delivered; held flat as a conservatism against an inflating input
Feed cost per kilogram of fish	R47.18	R38.76	The largest single cost, and 42% of the Year 5 production cost
Mortality	28%	13%	First-cycle losses are normal; Year 1 is deliberately high
Energy cost per kilogram	R17.00	R10.00	Net of solar generation
Full production cost per kilogram	R197.80	R91.60	Against a realised price of R98.10 by Year 5
Realised fish price	R94.00/kg	R98.10/kg	Blended across live, fresh chilled whole and fillet channels
Fingerlings sold to third parties	—	2 600 000	Plus 250 000 stocked into own grow-out
Fingerling price	R2.60	R2.60	Within a market range of R2.40 to R2.90 for sexed five-gram stock
Fingerling direct cost	R0.95	R0.95	A 63.5% contribution margin

16.2 Capital, cost and funding

Assumption	Value	Basis
Qualifying capital expenditure	R17 400 000	Hatchery, grow-out, water, energy, processing and site works
Land preparation, permits and pre-operating costs	R1 400 000	R600 000 capitalised and amortised over ten years; R800 000 charged against reserves at inception
Working capital and pre-revenue deficit	R6 800 000	Sized against R9.77m of cumulative operating cash consumption in Years 1 to 3
Total project cost	R25 600 000
Promoter and investor equity	R18 600 000	65% of project cost
Term debt	R7 000 000	Eight years at 13.5% with a three-year principal grace period
Cost-sharing grant	R4 000 000	ADEP reimbursable claim, received in Year 2, released to income over twelve years
Depreciation	R1 376 667 a year at full commissioning	Qualifying capital expenditure over lives of ten to twenty years
Labour	R1 620 000 rising to R2 850 000	Four technicians rising to eight, plus the management and processing team
Overhead	R1 320 000 rising to R2 000 000	Insurance, compliance, professional fees, administration and site services
Corporate tax	27% with assessed losses carried forward	Section 20 limitation applied; the charge is R46 620 in Year 4 and R134 301 in Year 5
Debtor days	30 days
Creditor days	30 days
Feed and consumables inventory	45 days
Exit multiple	6.0x Year 5 EBITDA	Readers should substitute their own; the sensitivity is set out in Section 11.2

16.3 Assumptions most in need of independent verification

Assumption	Modelled	Verification required	Consequence if wrong
Fingerling demand	2.6 million a year at R2.60	Direct enquiry with South African tilapia farms, cooperatives and restocking programmes on volume, price and purchase frequency	The largest single sensitivity. A 25% shortfall removes R1 554 000 of Year 5 profit and the contribution engine stops working
Species permit	NEMBA permit granted for Oreochromis niloticus	Pre-application engagement with DFFE and the chosen provincial authority before any site commitment	Harvest tonnage falls by roughly a quarter on the Mozambique fallback and the grow-out farm becomes marginal
Premium channel depth	150 t a year at a blended R98.10	Signed weekly-volume agreements with named live, fresh and fillet buyers, not expressions of interest	At a R6.50 margin there is no room for unsold fish. A 10% realisation shortfall removes R1 335 199
Feed price and conversion	R25.50/kg at FCR 1.52	Bulk quotations from local and imported suppliers; trial data on the specific strain	Feed is 42% of production cost. A 20% price rise removes R1 026 499 of Year 5 profit
Energy cost and reliability	R10.00 per kilogram by Year 5, net of solar	Site-specific tariff, notified maximum demand and outage history; solar and battery sizing against aeration load	Aeration failure is a stock loss rather than a cost overrun. This is the risk that kills tanks
Broodstock traceability	Traceable records supporting a genetics premium	Provenance documentation and performance data from the source before purchase	Without records the hatchery is selling the same undifferentiated product as the rest of the sector
Grant eligibility	R4.0m ADEP claim against R17.4m of qualifying spend	Written confirmation of eligibility and the claim process with the dtic before construction	The claim restores the cash buffer rather than funding the build, so a rejection is survivable but tightens Years 3 and 4
Capital cost	R17.4m of qualifying capital expenditure	Fixed-price quotations for the hatchery, tanks, tunnels, water treatment and energy systems	Overruns fall in the years the enterprise is already consuming cash

The list is ordered by consequence rather than by cost of verification, and the first three are the plan. Fingerling demand determines whether the business earns anything; the species permit determines whether the grow-out half can be built as designed; and the premium channel determines whether the fish are worth harvesting. All three can be settled by enquiry and negotiation before meaningful capital is committed, and a funder with a limited diligence budget should spend it strictly in that order.

Previous section15. Key Performance Indicators

Next section17. Conclusion and Recommendation