Naledi Threads Business Plan — Location Strategy

Why Protea Glen Square, what the 55 m2 gross lettable footprint costs, and the trading conditions the site brings.

Location Strategy

Jump to section
On this page

  • 4.1 Why a community centre rather than a regional mall
  • 4.2 Site screening methodology
  • 4.3 Recommended site
  • 4.4 Store specification
  • 4.5 Lease terms and the turnover clause

4.1 Why a community centre rather than a regional mall

Location is the most consequential decision in this plan, and the most commonly got wrong. The instinct of a first-time fashion retailer is to seek the highest-footfall centre available. For a business of this size that instinct is close to fatal.

Super-regional centres achieved market rentals of roughly R308 per square metre against an all-centre base rent index near R235 in late 2024, and premium locations such as the V&A Waterfront are reported to let at R400 to R600 per square metre. At R500 per square metre a 55 m² store carries R330 000 of base rent a year. Against the plan’s Year 1 revenue that is a rent-to-sales ratio of 18.2 per cent — roughly double what fashion retail can sustain. The store would be insolvent on rent alone before it bought a single garment.

Meanwhile community and smaller centres closed 2024 at trading densities of about R42 918 per square metre against R49 443 for super-regionals — a 13 per cent shortfall in sales productivity for something closer to a 20 to 25 per cent saving in rent. That arithmetic favours the smaller centre for any tenant whose competitive advantage is not footfall-dependent.

4.2 Site screening methodology

Six candidate sites across four provinces were scored against seven weighted criteria. The weights reflect what actually drives an independent boutique’s survival, which is not the same as what drives a chain store’s site selection.

Criterion

Weight

Why it carries this weight

Catchment size and density

20%

Determines the ceiling on achievable transactions per day

Target-segment income fit

18%

R270 average unit retail requires disposable income, not just population

Occupancy cost affordability

17%

The binding constraint identified in 4.1

Competitive saturation, inverse

15%

Direct fashion competition dilutes an already thin catchment share

Footfall quality and dwell time

12%

Dwell time converts better than raw traffic; transit nodes convert poorly

Anchor and tenant mix support

10%

A grocery anchor drives the weekly visit the store depends on

Availability of a 50–70 m² line shop

8%

A 55 m² unit must actually exist and be available at the right rent

Weighted site scores. Sandton City scores well on customer income and footfall and is disqualified on occupancy cost — illustrating why unweighted footfall is a misleading guide
Figure 7. Weighted site scores. Sandton City scores well on customer income and footfall and is disqualified on occupancy cost — illustrating why unweighted footfall is a misleading guide.

Protea Glen Square in Soweto scores highest at 8.25 out of 10. The case rests on four points: catchment depth, with Soweto’s population measured in the region of 1.3 to 2 million depending on boundary definition and Protea Glen one of its faster-growing residential extensions; occupancy affordability, with community-centre line-shop rentals in this band supporting the plan’s assumed base rent of R248 per square metre, close to the national all-centre base rent index and roughly 20 per cent below super-regional market rentals; grocery anchoring, because a supermarket anchor generates the weekly repeat visit that the revenue model’s assumption of four to seven visits per customer per year depends on; and lower fashion saturation, because the regional malls serving Soweto carry the full national fashion line-up while community centres carry value chains and a thin independent presence.

The honest counter-argument: Gauteng’s township retail is not under-shopped, competition can arrive within one lease cycle, and a 55 m² independent has no defence against a national chain taking space in the same centre. Section 16 carries this as a specific risk with a specific response.

4.4 Store specification

Parameter

Specification

Rationale

Gross lettable area

55 m²

Smallest area that carries a credible size curve across seven categories

Selling floor

45 m²

82% of gross lettable area; the balance is stockroom, fitting rooms and back-of-house

Fitting rooms

Two, both fully enclosed

Non-negotiable for a size-inclusive proposition; drives conversion

Frontage

Minimum 5.5 m glazed

Window display is the store’s largest single marketing asset

Position

Ground floor, on the anchor desire line

Between the grocery anchor and the main entrance

Trading hours

09:00–18:00 weekdays, 09:00–17:00 weekends

30 trading days a month assumed

Fit-out density

R7 582 per m²

Entry-level specification; a premium fit-out at R12 000/m² is not affordable here

4.5 Lease terms and the turnover clause

Base rent against the turnover clause. Turnover rent overtakes base rent in Year 3 and remains the operative basis thereafter
Figure 8. Base rent against the turnover clause. Turnover rent overtakes base rent in Year 3 and remains the operative basis thereafter.

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Base rent escalated at 7.0%

163 680

175 138

187 397

200 515

214 551

Turnover rent at 7.5% of sales

135 950

171 297

190 140

204 401

217 687

Operative basis, greater of

Base

Base

Turnover

Turnover

Turnover

Rent payable

163 680

175 138

190 140

204 401

217 687

Recoveries and marketing levy

49 500

52 965

56 673

60 640

64 884

Total occupancy cost

213 180

228 103

246 813

265 040

282 571

As a share of revenue

11.8%

10.0%

9.7%

9.7%

9.7%

Term

Assumed in the model

Negotiation objective

Base rental

R248/m²/month (R13 640/month)

Hold at or below this level

Operating cost recovery

R64/m²/month

Require an audited annual reconciliation

Marketing levy

R11/m²/month

Confirm what the levy actually funds

Annual escalation

7.0%

Push to 6% or CPI plus 1.5%

Turnover clause

7.5% of turnover, greater-of basis

Raise the breakpoint or cut the rate to 6.5%. This becomes the operative basis from Year 3

Lease term

Five years

Five years with a tenant-only break at month 36

Beneficial occupation

Not assumed

Secure 6–8 weeks rent-free for fit-out and trading build

Deposit

Two months gross rental

Negotiate to one month, or a bank guarantee in place of cash

Beneficial occupation is the term most often left on the table. Six to eight weeks rent-free during fit-out is worth roughly R25 000 to R33 000 of cash at a point in the plan where the opening buffer is doing all the work, and landlords in community centres will frequently concede it to secure a five-year tenant. It costs nothing to ask and it is not recoverable once the lease is signed.