Naledi Threads Business Plan — Location Strategy
Why Protea Glen Square, what the 55 m2 gross lettable footprint costs, and the trading conditions the site brings.
Location Strategy
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. The Business
- 3. Market Analysis
- 4. Location Strategy
- 5. Products and Merchandise Strategy
- 6. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 7. Marketing and Sales
- 8. Operations
- 9. People, Compliance and Controls
- 10. Implementation Plan
- 11. Financial Plan
- 12. Break-Even
- 13. Working Capital and Debt Service
- 14. Returns
- 15. Sensitivity and Scenarios
- 16. Risk Management
- 17. Trigger Points and Management Response
- 18. Key Performance Indicators
- 19. Key Assumptions
- 20. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital and Pre-Opening Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
- 4.1 Why a community centre rather than a regional mall
- 4.2 Site screening methodology
- 4.3 Recommended site
- 4.4 Store specification
- 4.5 Lease terms and the turnover clause
4.1 Why a community centre rather than a regional mall
Location is the most consequential decision in this plan, and the most commonly got wrong. The instinct of a first-time fashion retailer is to seek the highest-footfall centre available. For a business of this size that instinct is close to fatal.
Super-regional centres achieved market rentals of roughly R308 per square metre against an all-centre base rent index near R235 in late 2024, and premium locations such as the V&A Waterfront are reported to let at R400 to R600 per square metre. At R500 per square metre a 55 m² store carries R330 000 of base rent a year. Against the plan’s Year 1 revenue that is a rent-to-sales ratio of 18.2 per cent — roughly double what fashion retail can sustain. The store would be insolvent on rent alone before it bought a single garment.
Meanwhile community and smaller centres closed 2024 at trading densities of about R42 918 per square metre against R49 443 for super-regionals — a 13 per cent shortfall in sales productivity for something closer to a 20 to 25 per cent saving in rent. That arithmetic favours the smaller centre for any tenant whose competitive advantage is not footfall-dependent.
4.2 Site screening methodology
Six candidate sites across four provinces were scored against seven weighted criteria. The weights reflect what actually drives an independent boutique’s survival, which is not the same as what drives a chain store’s site selection.
|
Criterion |
Weight |
Why it carries this weight |
|---|---|---|
|
Catchment size and density |
20% |
Determines the ceiling on achievable transactions per day |
|
Target-segment income fit |
18% |
R270 average unit retail requires disposable income, not just population |
|
Occupancy cost affordability |
17% |
The binding constraint identified in 4.1 |
|
Competitive saturation, inverse |
15% |
Direct fashion competition dilutes an already thin catchment share |
|
Footfall quality and dwell time |
12% |
Dwell time converts better than raw traffic; transit nodes convert poorly |
|
Anchor and tenant mix support |
10% |
A grocery anchor drives the weekly visit the store depends on |
|
Availability of a 50–70 m² line shop |
8% |
A 55 m² unit must actually exist and be available at the right rent |
4.3 Recommended site
Protea Glen Square in Soweto scores highest at 8.25 out of 10. The case rests on four points: catchment depth, with Soweto’s population measured in the region of 1.3 to 2 million depending on boundary definition and Protea Glen one of its faster-growing residential extensions; occupancy affordability, with community-centre line-shop rentals in this band supporting the plan’s assumed base rent of R248 per square metre, close to the national all-centre base rent index and roughly 20 per cent below super-regional market rentals; grocery anchoring, because a supermarket anchor generates the weekly repeat visit that the revenue model’s assumption of four to seven visits per customer per year depends on; and lower fashion saturation, because the regional malls serving Soweto carry the full national fashion line-up while community centres carry value chains and a thin independent presence.
The honest counter-argument: Gauteng’s township retail is not under-shopped, competition can arrive within one lease cycle, and a 55 m² independent has no defence against a national chain taking space in the same centre. Section 16 carries this as a specific risk with a specific response.
4.4 Store specification
|
Parameter |
Specification |
Rationale |
|---|---|---|
|
Gross lettable area |
55 m² |
Smallest area that carries a credible size curve across seven categories |
|
Selling floor |
45 m² |
82% of gross lettable area; the balance is stockroom, fitting rooms and back-of-house |
|
Fitting rooms |
Two, both fully enclosed |
Non-negotiable for a size-inclusive proposition; drives conversion |
|
Frontage |
Minimum 5.5 m glazed |
Window display is the store’s largest single marketing asset |
|
Position |
Ground floor, on the anchor desire line |
Between the grocery anchor and the main entrance |
|
Trading hours |
09:00–18:00 weekdays, 09:00–17:00 weekends |
30 trading days a month assumed |
|
Fit-out density |
R7 582 per m² |
Entry-level specification; a premium fit-out at R12 000/m² is not affordable here |
4.5 Lease terms and the turnover clause
|
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Base rent escalated at 7.0% |
163 680 |
175 138 |
187 397 |
200 515 |
214 551 |
|
Turnover rent at 7.5% of sales |
135 950 |
171 297 |
190 140 |
204 401 |
217 687 |
|
Operative basis, greater of |
Base |
Base |
Turnover |
Turnover |
Turnover |
|
Rent payable |
163 680 |
175 138 |
190 140 |
204 401 |
217 687 |
|
Recoveries and marketing levy |
49 500 |
52 965 |
56 673 |
60 640 |
64 884 |
|
Total occupancy cost |
213 180 |
228 103 |
246 813 |
265 040 |
282 571 |
|
As a share of revenue |
11.8% |
10.0% |
9.7% |
9.7% |
9.7% |
|
Term |
Assumed in the model |
Negotiation objective |
|---|---|---|
|
Base rental |
R248/m²/month (R13 640/month) |
Hold at or below this level |
|
Operating cost recovery |
R64/m²/month |
Require an audited annual reconciliation |
|
Marketing levy |
R11/m²/month |
Confirm what the levy actually funds |
|
Annual escalation |
7.0% |
Push to 6% or CPI plus 1.5% |
|
Turnover clause |
7.5% of turnover, greater-of basis |
Raise the breakpoint or cut the rate to 6.5%. This becomes the operative basis from Year 3 |
|
Lease term |
Five years |
Five years with a tenant-only break at month 36 |
|
Beneficial occupation |
Not assumed |
Secure 6–8 weeks rent-free for fit-out and trading build |
|
Deposit |
Two months gross rental |
Negotiate to one month, or a bank guarantee in place of cash |
Beneficial occupation is the term most often left on the table. Six to eight weeks rent-free during fit-out is worth roughly R25 000 to R33 000 of cash at a point in the plan where the opening buffer is doing all the work, and landlords in community centres will frequently concede it to secure a five-year tenant. It costs nothing to ask and it is not recoverable once the lease is signed.