Bloomhouse Florals — Sensitivity, Investor Returns & Exit

The sensitivity analysis, investor returns and exit — the 20.4% project IRR, the 44.7% equity IRR and 6.35× MOIC on a hold-to-exit basis, and the exit pathways.

Bloomhouse Florals Business PlanSection 16 › Sensitivity, Investor Returns & Exit

Section 16 · Business Plan

Sensitivity, Investor Returns & Exit

The sensitivity analysis, investor returns and exit — the 20.4% project IRR, the 44.7% equity IRR and 6.35× MOIC on a hold-to-exit basis, and the exit pathways.

This section presents the investor returns on a hold-to-exit basis,
stress-tests them against the plan’s key uncertainties, and sets out the
exit options. Consistent with the honest posture of this document, the
conservative project-level return is presented first, and the more
attractive equity return is explicitly flagged as dependent on
delivering the growth case and on the exit multiple achieved.

16.1 Headline returns

PROJECT IRR
20.4%
EQUITY IRR
44.7%
MOIC
6.35x
NPV (project @15%)
R4.4m
Return metric Base case
Project IRR (unlevered, hold-to-exit) 20.4%
Equity IRR (levered, hold-to-exit) 44.7%
Money-on-invested-capital (MOIC) 6.35x
NPV — project, discounted at 15% R4.4m
NPV — equity, discounted at 18% R11.7m
Exit EBITDA multiple assumed 4.5x
Terminal enterprise value (Year 5) R35.6m
Terminal equity value (Year 5) R41.9m

Table 30. Investor returns on a hold-to-exit
basis. Equity returns assume no interim dividends; value is realised on
exit at the assumed multiple.

ANALYST CALLOUT Strong equity returns — but explicitly
exit- and growth-dependent

The base-case equity IRR of 44.7% and 6.35x MOIC are computed on a
hold-to-exit basis, assuming the full 39.5% revenue CAGR is delivered
and a 4.5x EBITDA exit multiple in Year 5. Both assumptions are
material. The more conservative project IRR of 20.4% — which strips out
leverage — is the figure investors should anchor to when assessing the
underlying business. The sensitivity analysis below shows how quickly
equity returns erode if growth disappoints, and the exit multiple is
itself a function of market conditions at the time of sale. These
dependencies are flagged deliberately rather than smoothed
over.

16.2 One-way sensitivities

The two tables below isolate the effect on equity IRR of, first, a
shift in revenue and, second, a shift in cost of sales. Revenue is by
far the more powerful lever: a 19% revenue shortfall cuts equity IRR to
single digits, while a similar over-performance lifts it above 60%.

Revenue vs base Equity IRR
-19% 6.7%
-9% 31.5%
+0% 44.7%
+10% 54.0%
+19% 61.4%

Table 31. Equity IRR sensitivity to revenue.
Revenue is the dominant driver of returns.

Cost of sales vs base Equity IRR
+4pp COGS 36.4%
+2pp COGS 40.9%
+0pp COGS 44.7%
-2pp COGS 48.2%
-4pp COGS 51.3%

Table 32. Equity IRR sensitivity to cost of
sales (gross margin). Each 2pp of cost of sales shifts equity IRR by
roughly 4pp.

Figure 19.
Figure 19. Tornado chart — sensitivity of equity IRR to the key value drivers, ranked by impact. Revenue dominates.

16.3 Two-way sensitivity

The heat-map below combines the two drivers, showing equity IRR
across a grid of revenue and cost-of-sales scenarios. The deep-downside
corner — a large revenue shortfall combined with cost-of-sales
deterioration — is where the investment case is most exposed, and the
grid makes that explicit.

Figure 20.
Figure 20. Two-way sensitivity of equity IRR to revenue (rows) and cost of sales (columns). The lower-left corner is the downside the structure must withstand.

16.4 Exit strategy

The plan assumes a hold-to-exit return realised in Year 5, but the
business is built to offer several credible exit routes. The most likely
is a trade sale to a larger floral, gifting or hospitality group
attracted by the recurring corporate base, the brand and the cold-chain
platform. Alternatives include a sale to a financial buyer, a management
or sponsor buy-out of the investor’s stake, or a recapitalisation that
returns capital while the sponsor continues to grow the business.

  • Trade sale. To a strategic acquirer in floral
    retail, gifting, hospitality or e-commerce logistics, valuing the
    recurring revenue base and brand.
  • Financial buyer. Sale to a private-equity or
    search-fund buyer seeking a cash-generative, branded consumer
    platform.
  • Sponsor / management buy-out. Repurchase of the
    investor’s stake from accumulated cash and refinancing once the business
    is established.
  • Recapitalisation. A debt-funded distribution
    returning part of the investor’s capital while retaining
    upside.
Figure 21.
Figure 21. Investor cash-flow profile and cumulative return to exit, illustrating the hold-to-exit return realised in Year 5.
RISK FLAG The exit multiple is an assumption, not a
promise

The 4.5x EBITDA exit multiple used here is deliberately moderate for
a growing, branded, partly-recurring consumer business, but the multiple
actually achieved will depend on the business’s scale, growth and margin
at exit and on market conditions at the time. A lower exit multiple, or
a delayed exit, would reduce the equity return materially. Investors
should form their own view of an appropriate exit multiple and test the
return accordingly.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of Bloomhouse Florals (Pty) Ltd.