AgriNova Sugar SA — Capital Structure, Funding & Returns

The ZAR 14.0 billion capital structure and 57:43 debt-to-equity mix, the funding plan and use of proceeds, the DSCR coverage, and the projected returns including the 19.8% IRR and 3.7× multiple.

AgriNova Sugar SA Business PlanSection 12 › Capital Structure, Funding & Returns

Section 12 · Business Plan

Capital Structure, Funding & Returns

The ZAR 14.0 billion capital structure and 57:43 debt-to-equity mix, the funding plan and use of proceeds, the DSCR coverage, and the projected returns including the 19.8% IRR and 3.7× multiple.

12.1 Capital Raise

AgriNova is raising ZAR 14.0 billion (≈ USD 750 million at 18.7
ZAR/USD) at financial close to fund the acquisition, upgrade and
build-out programme described in Section 5. The capital raise is
structured at a target debt-to-equity ratio of 57:43, calibrated to
maintain a Net debt / EBITDA ratio peaking at approximately 3.6x in Year
4 and declining to 0.5x by Year 8.

Figure 6
Figure 6 — Use of funds composition

12.2 Sources of Funds

The capital structure has been designed to balance the cost of
capital, lender risk appetite, ESG considerations (DFI eligibility,
green-bond proceeds), and the strategic priorities of the sponsor. The
sources are summarised below.

Figure 7
Figure 7 — Sources of funds and capital structure
Tranche Amount (R m) Type Tenor Pricing (illustrative) Security
Sponsor equity 1,500 Common equity Permanent
DFI equity (IDC / PIC / DBSA) 2,000 Common equity Permanent Pari-passu Board nominee
Strategic equity partner 2,500 Common equity Permanent Pari-passu Co-investment rights
Senior secured debt 4,500 Term loan A 8 years JIBAR + 410 bps First lien on PP&E + receivables
Mezzanine debt 1,500 Subordinated 9 years JIBAR + 700 bps Second lien
Green bond (energy ring-fence) 1,000 Listed bond (JSE) 10 years R186 + 230 bps Ring-fenced over energy assets
Working capital revolver 1,000 RCF 5 years JIBAR + 280 bps Pledge of inventory + receivables
Total raise 14,000

12.3 Debt Service & Coverage

The Plan’s projected DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio) profile is
comfortably above the 1.3x lender minimum throughout the projection
period, averaging 3.4x once Phase 2 is operational. This provides
material headroom against downside scenarios and supports
investment-grade-equivalent metrics by Year 4.

Figure 8
Figure 8 — Operating cash flow, debt service and DSCR coverage
Coverage metric Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8
EBITDA / interest 3.3x 2.2x 3.0x 3.9x 5.5x 7.2x 9.6x 13.4x
DSCR (CFADS / debt service) 2.1x 1.5x 2.1x 2.7x 3.7x 4.8x 5.9x 8.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.2x 6.0x 4.2x 3.1x 1.8x 1.1x 0.6x 0.5x
Debt / total capital 52% 64% 67% 65% 58% 48% 36% 22%
FFO / Net debt 10% 13% 21% 29% 44% 65% 98% 151%

12.4 Returns Analysis

AgriNova’s projected returns are attractive in absolute terms and
against agricultural and emerging-market private-equity benchmarks. The
base-case levered project IRR is 19.8%, with a money multiple of 3.7x
over the 8-year hold. Equity NPV (at 12% real discount rate) is
approximately ZAR 9.4 billion.

Figure 20
Figure 20 — Project IRR build-up by value driver
Returns metric Base case Downside (P10) Upside (P90)
Project IRR (levered) 19.8% 13.2% 26.4%
Equity NPV (R bn, @12% real) 9.4 3.1 16.7
Money multiple (8-year hold) 3.7x 2.1x 5.4x
Payback period (cumulative FCF) 4.8 years 6.4 years 3.8 years
Year-8 enterprise value (R bn) 62 38 84
Year-8 EV/EBITDA multiple 4.7x 3.6x 5.8x

12.5 Sensitivity Analysis

The Plan’s sensitivity analysis quantifies the impact of key
variables on the project’s NPV, isolating one variable at a time. The
most material variables are sugar price (each 15% movement shifts NPV by
approximately R3.3 billion), cane yield, the ZAR/USD exchange rate, and
mill recovery rate.

Figure 9
Figure 9 — Tornado sensitivity analysis on project NPV

In addition to single-variable sensitivities, the Plan has been
stress-tested under three scenarios: (a) a base case (the projections
shown in this Plan), (b) a downside case combining a 12% sugar price
reduction, a 10% yield decline and a 12-month delay in ethanol
commissioning, and (c) an upside case combining a 12% sugar price
increase, accelerated land monetisation, and 1 percentage point of
incremental sugar recovery. The downside case still delivers a project
IRR above the Group WACC of 10.8%.

12.6 Investor Returns Profile by Tranche

Investor Capital (R m) Y8 cash returns (R m) Money multiple IRR
Sponsor equity 1,500 5,800 3.9x 20.8%
DFI equity 2,000 7,400 3.7x 20.0%
Strategic equity 2,500 9,200 3.7x 19.9%
Senior debt holders 4,500 8,300 1.85x 11.4%
Mezzanine holders 1,500 3,200 2.13x 14.8%
Green bond holders 1,000 1,920 1.92x 11.7%
Working capital revolver 1,000 1,510 1.51x 8.5%

12.7 Refinancing and Exit Strategy

AgriNova’s exit architecture envisages multiple monetisation paths
for capital providers, sequenced over the latter half of the plan
period:

  1. Year 6–7: Senior debt refinancing into a longer-tenor,
    lower-spread package once investment-grade-equivalent metrics are
    achieved. Expected savings: 80–110 bps on the senior tranche.
  2. Year 6–7: Partial DFI exit via secondary sale to private equity
    or strategic, returning approximately 60% of original DFI
    capital.
  3. Year 7–8: Selective divestiture of land holdings or one operating
    division (e.g., Energy & Utilities) to a strategic buyer if
    non-organic value creation is unachievable internally.
  4. Year 8: JSE main-board listing of the Group or a sale to an
    industrial trade buyer, providing liquidity for sponsor and strategic
    equity holders.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of AgriNova Sugar SA (Pty) Ltd.