AetherGrid Digital Infrastructure — Financial Plan
The basis of preparation, the projected profit and loss, cash flow and balance sheet, the debt, gearing and cover, the returns, exit and sensitivity and the lender covenant dashboard underpinning AetherGrid.
Section 8 · Business Plan
Financial Plan
The basis of preparation, the projected profit and loss, cash flow and balance sheet, the debt, gearing and cover, the returns, exit and sensitivity and the lender covenant dashboard underpinning AetherGrid.
8.1 Basis of preparation
Sponsor anchors preserved; below-EBITDA independently
re-derived. Revenue, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, the R22.5 billion
capital programme, the funding stack and the campus schedule are the
sponsor’s figures, preserved exactly. Depreciation (by asset-class life,
buildings, electrical, cooling, fibre, security), interest (on the drawn
senior-debt schedule), South African corporate tax (27% with
assessed-loss carry-forward under section 20, capped at 80% of taxable
income), working capital, the revolving facility, the full
three-statement model, DSCR and returns are independently re-derived.
All figures are ZAR. The balance sheet ties to zero in every projection
year.
— key finding
The sponsor’s headline net-profit path (R80m in Year 3 rising to
R4,950m in Year 10) understates depreciation and interest. Charging full
depreciation on the R22.5bn asset base over asset-class lives, and cash
interest on the drawn senior debt, the re-derived path is a Year-3 loss
of about R226m turning positive from Year 5 and reaching about R3,608m
by Year 10, roughly R1.34bn below the sponsor’s Year-10 figure.
Investors should anchor on the re-derived, fully-loaded figures. The
divergence does not undermine the case — EBITDA, the metric that drives
infrastructure valuation, is preserved and the returns remain strong,
but it corrects an optimistic net-profit line and, with it, the stated
Year-10 balance sheet (whose R36.8bn PPE is not reconcilable with a
R22.5bn programme; the re-derived, internally-consistent balance sheet
is presented in Section 8.4).
8.2 Projected profit & loss (R m)
| R m | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 850 | 1,600 | 2,700 | 4,000 | 5,600 | 7,300 | 9,000 | 11,200 |
| EBITDA | 380 | 780 | 1,420 | 2,200 | 3,150 | 4,200 | 5,250 | 6,550 |
| EBITDA margin % | 45 | 49 | 53 | 55 | 56 | 58 | 58 | 58 |
| Depreciation | (204) | (367) | (489) | (652) | (855) | (1018) | (1140) | (1263) |
| Interest | (403) | (575) | (690) | (690) | (604) | (518) | (431) | (345) |
| Profit before tax | (226) | (162) | 241 | 858 | 1,691 | 2,664 | 3,679 | 4,943 |
| Taxation | – | – | (13) | (133) | (457) | (719) | (993) | (1335) |
| Re-derived NPAT | (226) | (162) | 228 | 726 | 1,234 | 1,945 | 2,685 | 3,608 |
| Memo: sponsor NPAT | 80 | 320 | 760 | 1,350 | 2,050 | 2,950 | 3,900 | 4,950 |
Net profit turns positive from Year 5 as lease-up lifts revenue past
the fixed depreciation and interest base; accumulated assessed losses
from the ramp shelter cash tax into the operating phase. The memo line
shows the sponsor’s headline NPAT for comparison, consistently above the
re-derived figure by the amount of under-charged D&A and
interest.
8.3 Projected cash flow (R m)
| R m | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | 380 | 780 | 1,420 | 2,200 | 3,150 | 4,200 | 5,250 | 6,550 |
| Tax paid | – | – | (13) | (133) | (457) | (719) | (993) | (1335) |
| Δ working capital | (43) | (38) | (55) | (65) | (80) | (85) | (85) | (110) |
| Capex | (3,800) | (3,100) | (3,050) | (2,600) | (1,650) | (1,150) | (850) | (300) |
| Debt drawdowns | 2,000 | 1,500 | 1,000 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Equity injections | 3,200 | 2,400 | 1,800 | 1,200 | 800 | – | – | – |
| Debt service | (403) | (575) | (690) | (1440) | (1354) | (1268) | (1181) | (1095) |
| Dividends | – | – | – | – | (1,111) | (1,751) | (2,417) | (3,247) |
| Closing cash | 3,763 | 4,730 | 5,142 | 4,304 | 3,603 | 2,831 | 2,554 | 3,018 |
8.4 Projected balance sheet (R m)
| R m | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational PPE (net) | 3,055 | 5,294 | 6,761 | 8,715 | 11,118 | 12,707 | 13,521 | 14,214 |
| Construction in progress | 6,542 | 7,036 | 8,131 | 8,124 | 6,516 | 5,060 | 3,955 | 2,300 |
| Working capital + cash | 3,805 | 4,810 | 5,277 | 4,504 | 3,883 | 3,196 | 3,004 | 3,578 |
| Total assets | 13,401 | 17,140 | 20,168 | 21,344 | 21,517 | 20,962 | 20,480 | 20,091 |
| Equity | 9,901 | 12,140 | 14,168 | 16,094 | 17,017 | 17,212 | 17,480 | 17,841 |
| Debt (senior + RCF) | 3,500 | 5,000 | 6,000 | 5,250 | 4,500 | 3,750 | 3,000 | 2,250 |
| Total equity & liabilities | 13,401 | 17,140 | 20,168 | 21,344 | 21,517 | 20,962 | 20,480 | 20,091 |
| Balance check | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8.5 Debt, gearing and cover
Conservative gearing is a double-edged finding. The
funding stack is roughly 73% equity and 27% senior debt, low gearing for
infrastructure, where 50–65% debt is common. This de-risks the debt:
DSCR is thin only in the Year-3 ramp (0.84x) and then rises through 1.3x
by Year 4 to comfortably above 3x by Year 9, so lenders are well
covered. The trade-off is that equity carries most of the capital burden
and returns lean heavily on the exit. A future re-leveraging once
campuses stabilise could release equity value, and is a natural
optimisation the plan flags.
8.6 Returns, exit and sensitivity
The exit multiple is the swing variable, but the deal works
without an aggressive one. Global data centre peers (Equinix,
Digital Realty) trade at roughly 20–25x EV/EBITDA; the sponsor assumes
an 18x exit on Year-10 EBITDA of R6,550m, implying an enterprise value
of R117.9bn and, after net debt, equity value of about R119bn. Applying
a conservative 13x, a meaningful South African country- and
currency-risk discount to global peers, still yields an enterprise value
of about R85bn and equity value near R86bn. The re-derived project IRR
is 30.7%, and the equity IRR is approximately 28.0% at the conservative
13x (a 6.0x equity multiple) rising to about 33.1% at the sponsor’s 18x
(8.1x), the latter closely reproducing the sponsor’s stated 31% IRR and
7.5x multiple, which validates the sponsor’s returns while showing they
depend on the aggressive multiple.
| Sensitivity (equity IRR) | Value |
|---|---|
| Base case — conservative 13x exit | 28.0% |
| Exit multiple 11x | 25.5% |
| Exit multiple 15x | 30.2% |
| Sponsor exit 18x | 33.1% |
| EBITDA −15% | 25.6% |
| EBITDA +10% | 29.5% |
Even on a conservative 13x exit, well below where global data centre
assets trade, the equity IRR is approximately 28% at a ~6.0x multiple,
and the return stays above 25% across an EBITDA shortfall of 15% or an
exit as low as 11x. The investment does not require the sponsor’s
aggressive 18x multiple to deliver an infrastructure-beating return; the
18x case is upside, not the base. What the returns do require is
successful power procurement and lease-up, the operational, not the
valuation, variables. That is where diligence and mitigation should
concentrate.
8.7 Lender covenant and coverage dashboard
The table sets out an indicative senior-debt covenant package and the
platform’s projected position. The conservative gearing produces
comfortable cover once campuses stabilise; the only pressure point is
the Year-3 ramp, which the debt-service reserve and a distribution
lock-up are sized to bridge.
| Covenant / metric | Threshold | Ramp (Y3–4) | Mature (Y7–10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum DSCR | ≥ 1.30x | 0.84x → 1.29x | 1.93x → 4.66x |
| Gearing (debt/assets) | ≤ 60% | ~25–30% | < 15% |
| Debt-service reserve | 6 months | Funded | Funded |
| Interest cover (EBITDA/interest) | ≥ 2.0x | 0.9x → 1.4x | > 5x |
| Distribution lock-up | DSCR < 1.30x | Locked | Unlocked (sweep from Y7) |
| Loan life cover (LLCR) | ≥ 1.40x | ~1.3x | > 3x |
A lender reading this dashboard sees a well-covered credit whose only
material risk window is the Year-3 lease-up. The mitigations, a funded
six-month debt-service reserve, a distribution lock-up until DSCR clears
1.30x, completion support during construction, and the low absolute
gearing, make the senior debt robust. The conservative structure that
constrains equity returns is precisely what makes the debt attractive,
an intentional trade the plan makes explicit.
Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of AetherGrid Digital Infrastructure Holdings (Pty) Ltd.