Solvanta Renewables — Financial Plan

The modelling approach and integrity, the key assumptions, the projected profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flow, the capital programme, the debt profile and service cover and the scenario and sensitivity analysis underpinning Solvanta.

Solvanta Renewables Business PlanSection 17 › Financial Plan

Section 17 · Business Plan

Financial Plan

The modelling approach and integrity, the key assumptions, the projected profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flow, the capital programme, the debt profile and service cover and the scenario and sensitivity analysis underpinning Solvanta.

Modelling approach and integrity

The projections below derive from an integrated three-statement
financial model built independently from the sponsor brief. The
sponsor’s headline revenue, EBITDA, installed capacity and energy
volumes are preserved exactly in every year; everything below EBITDA is
re-derived from first principles, depreciation on a commissioned-asset
pool basis, interest split between capitalised construction-period
interest (IDC) and cash interest on operational debt, and South African
corporate income tax at 27% applying the assessed-loss carry-forward
with the 80%-of-taxable-income utilisation limitation. The balance sheet
is asserted to tie to zero in every projection year. Wheeled third-party
energy is recognised on a net (agency) basis under IFRS 15.

Key assumptions

Assumption Value Basis
Solar installed cost R11.8m per MW 2026 SA utility-scale benchmark, tracker + bifacial
Wind installed cost R20.5m per MW 2026 SA benchmark, 6 MW-class turbines
BESS installed cost R9.5m per MWh Containerised LFP, 2–4 hr duration
Solar / wind capacity factor 27.5% / 36.0% P50, SA resource corridors
Blended senior debt rate 11.0% DFI concessional + commercial blend, ZAR
Mezzanine rate 14.5% Holdco facility, FY2031
Senior gearing 65% of generation + grid capex Project-finance market standard
Repayment profile 1/15 p.a. from 2nd year post-draw Sculpted; ~18-month post-COD grace
Use-of-system charges R0.24–R0.28/kWh Transmission + distribution wheeling
Wheeling/trading fee (net) R0.11–R0.13/kWh Licensed trader benchmarks
Debtors / creditors 45 / 30 days C&I energy market terms
Corporate tax 27%, assessed-loss carry-forward SA Income Tax Act, s20 80% limitation
DSRA R400m by FY2030 Six months’ forward debt service

Projected profit and loss

R millions FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031
Owned generation revenue 70 393 1 130 2 459 4 780
Wheeling & trading fees (net) 5 21 55 141 280
Storage & grid services 4 16 50 115 205
O&M / asset management 6 20 45 85 135
Development fees 35 30 20 0 0
Total revenue 120 480 1 300 2 800 5 400
Grid & use-of-system charges (15) (76) (219) (489) (1 021)
Fleet O&M (16) (60) (151) (301) (598)
Firming & balancing energy (22) (81) (194) (352) (579)
Staff costs (88) (138) (205) (285) (375)
Development expensed (45) (55) (65) (75) (85)
Other operating costs (14) (15) (76) (318) (642)
EBITDA (80) 55 390 980 2 100
Depreciation (31) (133) (333) (661) (1 214)
EBIT (111) (78) 57 319 886
Cash interest — senior -0 (69) (255) (617) (1 186)
Interest — mezzanine -0 -0 -0 -0 (298)
Interest income 11 22 33 48 52
Profit before tax (101) (125) (165) (250) (546)
Taxation -0 -0 -0 -0 -0
Net profit after tax (101) (125) (165) (250) (546)
Figure 11
Figure 11: EBITDA progression and margin, FY2027–FY2031

The earnings profile is the canonical growth-IPP shape: EBITDA turns
positive in FY2028 and compounds to R2.1 billion, but net profit remains
negative in every plan year because depreciation and cash interest scale
with the commissioned asset base faster than the EBITDA of a fleet that
is, in each year, substantially mid-construction. The cumulative
assessed loss of approximately R1.19 billion at FY2031 shelters early
post-plan profits; on the sponsor trajectory, accounting profitability
arrives in FY2033 as the full fleet completes operating years without
matching construction interest.

Figure 12
Figure 12: FY2031 earnings bridge from revenue to net profit after tax

Projected balance sheet

R millions FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031
Property, plant & equipment (net) 1 120 3 794 8 885 16 818 31 749
Trade receivables 15 59 160 345 666
DSRA (restricted cash) 0 0 300 400 400
Cash and equivalents 350 350 350 350 350
Total assets 1 485 4 203 9 696 17 913 33 165
Senior project debt 629 2 315 5 608 10 784 20 470
Mezzanine facility 0 0 0 0 4 110
Trade payables 16 35 75 150 271
Total liabilities 645 2 350 5 683 10 934 24 852
Share capital 941 2 079 4 404 7 620 9 500
Retained earnings (101) (226) (391) (641) (1 187)
Total equity 840 1 854 4 013 6 979 8 313
Total equity & liabilities 1 485 4 203 9 696 17 913 33 165
Figure 13
Figure 13: Balance sheet composition: assets versus funding, FY2027–FY2031

Net PP&E grows to R31.7 billion as the programme commissions,
funded by R20.5 billion of senior debt, R4.1 billion of mezzanine and
R9.5 billion of contributed equity, less cumulative losses of R1.19
billion. The balance sheet ties to zero in every year under a hard model
assertion. Net debt to (in-place) EBITDA peaks at approximately 11.6x in
FY2031, a figure that looks alarming against operating-company norms but
reflects debt raised against a fleet whose full-year earnings arrive in
FY2032; against run-rate EBITDA of approximately R4.0 billion the ratio
is 6.0x, within infrastructure-platform norms though above the 4.5–5.0x
at which investment-grade IPPs typically term out.

Projected cash flow

R millions FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031
EBITDA (80) 55 390 980 2 100
Working capital movement 2 (26) (61) (110) (199)
Tax paid -0 -0 -0 -0 -0
Interest income 11 22 33 48 52
Cash flow from operations (68) 51 362 918 1 953
Capital expenditure (1 117) (2 714) (5 241) (8 301) (15 591)
Capitalised IDC (35) (93) (183) (293) (553)
DSRA funding 0 0 (300) (100) 0
Cash flow from investing (1 152) (2 807) (5 724) (8 694) (16 144)
Senior debt drawn 629 1 686 3 335 5 331 10 063
Senior repayments -0 -0 (42) (154) (377)
Cash interest paid -0 (69) (255) (617) (1 484)
Equity drawn 941 1 139 2 324 3 217 1 880
Mezzanine drawn 0 0 0 0 4 110
Cash flow from financing 1 569 2 756 5 363 7 776 14 192
Closing cash 350 350 350 350 350
Figure 14
Figure 14: FY2031 cash flow waterfall — funding the peak construction year

Operating cash flow turns positive in FY2029 and reaches R1.7 billion
by FY2031, but the investing line dominates throughout: cumulative capex
including IDC of R34.1 billion dwarfs cumulative operating cash flow of
R2.4 billion. The financing architecture, senior debt drawn pro-rata
with construction, equity tranches deployed against milestone gates, and
the mezzanine top-up in FY2031, is engineered to hold minimum free cash
of R350 million in every year while fully funding the build.

Capital programme

Figure 15
Figure 15: Capital expenditure programme by component — R34.1 billion over five years
R millions FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031
Solar PV 472 944 2 006 3 186 6 136
Onshore wind 205 1 025 2 050 3 690 7 790
Battery storage 190 475 855 1 045 1 235
Grid & wheeling infrastructure 100 150 220 280 320
Capitalised development 150 120 110 100 110
Capitalised IDC 35 93 183 293 553
Total capital programme 1 152 2 807 5 424 8 594 16 144

Debt profile and service cover

Figure 16
Figure 16: Debt facility profile: drawdowns, repayments and outstanding balances
Figure 17
Figure 17: Debt service cover: consolidated platform versus operational asset level
Metric FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031
CFADS (78) 29 329 870 1 901
Senior cash interest 0 69 255 617 1 186
Mezzanine interest 0 0 0 0 298
Scheduled repayments 0 0 42 154 377
Total debt service 0 69 297 771 1 861
Consolidated DSCR (x) n/a 0.42 1.11 1.13 1.02
Asset-level DSCR (x) n/a 4.09 2.74 2.30 2.20
ANALYST FINDING — Consolidated DSCR remains at or below
covenant levels throughout the plan window

Consolidated DSCR is 0.42x in FY2028 and stabilises at only
1.02–1.13x through FY2031, below the 1.30x threshold senior lenders
conventionally covenant, because construction-programme interest is
charged against a fleet that is perpetually mid-build. Operational
asset-level DSCR of 2.2–2.8x tells the true credit story: each
commissioned SPV services its own debt comfortably. Bankability
therefore requires the facility architecture this Plan proposes:
SPV-level covenants rather than consolidated tests during the build-out,
sculpted amortisation with post-COD grace, a R400 million DSRA, and
equity-funded holdco costs. Lenders applying a consolidated 1.30x
lock-up test to this platform during construction would trap cash in
every year of the plan.

Scenario analysis

Figure 18
Figure 18: Scenario envelope: base, upside and downside revenue paths
Scenario FY2031 revenue FY2031 EBITDA Equity IRR (run-rate 10.0x) Key drivers
Base R5.40bn R2.10bn 35.6% Sponsor trajectory; on-time delivery
Upside R6.05bn R2.56bn ~44% Faster wheeling ramp; tariff premium holds; BESS ancillary upside
Downside R4.32bn R1.30bn ~14% 12-month build slip; market tariffs; slower trading book
Severe R3.78bn R0.95bn ~2% Grid delays compound; mezzanine upsizing required; exit at 8.5x

Sensitivity analysis

Figure 19
Figure 19: Equity IRR sensitivity tornado — percentage-point impact versus 35.6% headline

Exit multiple dominates the sensitivity ranking: a 1.5x turn of the
run-rate multiple moves equity IRR by –29 to +17 percentage points, more
than tariff, capex and capacity factor combined. Operationally, realised
tariff is the largest lever management controls, a 10% shortfall against
the modelled R1.31–R1.36/kWh blended tariff (i.e., contracting at
today’s market benchmarks instead of the premium) costs 14.5 points of
IRR. The build schedule ranks fourth: a 12-month slip costs 8.4 points,
principally by delaying the run-rate year against which exit value is
struck.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of Solvanta Renewables (Pty) Ltd.