Mainstreet Brick Business Plan — Financial Projections
Five-year projections: revenue building to R63.7m and EBITDA to R5.32m, with the full cost stack and capacity utilisation by year.
Financial Projections
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. The Unit Economics of Brick Making
- 3. Market Analysis
- 4. Products and Positioning
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. Site, Plant and Production
- 7. Route to Market and Sales Strategy
- 8. Regulatory, Environmental and Quality Compliance
- 9. Management and Organisation
- 10. Capital Requirement and Funding
- 11. Financial Projections
- 12. Break-Even Analysis
- 13. Debt Service and Working Capital
- 14. Investment Returns
- 15. Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
- 16. Value Creation Levers
- 17. Risk Management
- 18. Implementation Timeline
- 19. Conditions for Success and Exit Options
- 20. Key Performance Indicators
- 21. Key Assumptions
- 22. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital and Depreciation Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
- 11.1 Assumptions
- 11.2 Projected income statement
- 11.3 Projected cash flow statement
- 11.4 Projected balance sheet
11.1 Assumptions
|
Assumption |
Value |
Note |
|---|---|---|
|
Installed capacity |
1 345 000 units a month |
Two shifts; 16.14 million units a year |
|
Capacity utilisation |
66% to 96% |
Years 1 to 5 ramp |
|
Reject and breakage rate |
3.0% of production |
Material consumed, no sale realised |
|
Selling price escalation |
5.5% a year |
Below cement escalation — margin compresses over the projection |
|
Cement price escalation |
7.5% a year |
Silo delivery pricing; the concentrated input |
|
Aggregate and crusher sand escalation |
6.5% a year |
Delivered pricing |
|
Blended material escalation |
6.9% a year |
Weighted at 43% cement |
|
Bad debt provision |
1.5% of revenue |
Against contractor default |
|
Operating cost escalation |
6.5% to 9.0% a year |
Wages 6.5%, electricity 9.0%, other 7.0% to 7.5% |
|
Depreciation |
R1 506 400 a year |
10-year straight line on R15.06m of plant and equipment |
|
Debtor days |
40 days |
Trade debtors against revenue |
|
Creditor days |
35 days |
Trade payables against materials and operating costs |
|
Raw material stock |
25 days |
Cement and aggregate on hand |
|
Corporate tax |
27% |
Standard rate; the Year 1 assessed loss carried forward |
|
Discount rate |
16.5% project, 20.0% equity |
Project hurdle reflecting start-up manufacturing risk in a cyclical sector |
|
Exit assumption |
3.5 times Year 5 EBITDA |
Conservative for a single regional plant |
11.2 Projected income statement
|
R’000 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revenue |
35 343 |
44 631 |
52 450 |
58 479 |
63 685 |
|
Cement |
(9 982) |
(12 776) |
(15 218) |
(17 197) |
(18 984) |
|
Aggregate, admixture and other materials |
(13 231) |
(16 935) |
(20 172) |
(22 797) |
(25 165) |
|
Bad debt provision |
(530) |
(669) |
(787) |
(877) |
(955) |
|
Gross profit |
11 600 |
14 251 |
16 273 |
17 607 |
18 581 |
|
Gross margin |
32.8% |
31.9% |
31.0% |
30.1% |
29.2% |
|
Operating costs |
(9 595) |
(10 811) |
(11 572) |
(12 388) |
(13 262) |
|
EBITDA |
2 005 |
3 440 |
4 701 |
5 219 |
5 319 |
|
EBITDA margin |
5.7% |
7.7% |
9.0% |
8.9% |
8.4% |
|
Depreciation |
(1 506) |
(1 506) |
(1 506) |
(1 506) |
(1 506) |
|
Interest |
(1 672) |
(1 600) |
(1 396) |
(1 167) |
(911) |
|
Profit / (loss) before tax |
(1 174) |
334 |
1 799 |
2 545 |
2 902 |
|
Taxation |
— |
— |
(259) |
(687) |
(783) |
|
Profit / (loss) after tax |
(1 174) |
334 |
1 540 |
1 858 |
2 118 |
|
Net margin |
-3.3% |
0.7% |
2.9% |
3.2% |
3.3% |
The shape of this statement is the investment case in miniature. Gross margin declines from 32.8 per cent to 29.2 per cent across the projection because cement is modelled to escalate at 7.5 per cent while selling prices escalate at 5.5 per cent — a deliberately conservative but realistic spread given that cement producers have historically passed energy and carbon costs through faster than masonry producers can recover them. Volume growth carries EBITDA upward despite that compression, but the trend is a warning: a brick plant that does not grow volume or shift mix will see its margins erode year on year.
11.3 Projected cash flow statement
|
R’000 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EBITDA |
2 005 |
3 440 |
4 701 |
5 219 |
5 319 |
|
Movement in working capital |
(1 367) |
(723) |
(628) |
(456) |
(373) |
|
Taxation paid |
— |
— |
(259) |
(687) |
(783) |
|
Operating cash flow after tax |
638 |
2 717 |
3 814 |
4 075 |
4 163 |
|
Interest paid |
(1 672) |
(1 600) |
(1 396) |
(1 167) |
(911) |
|
Capital repaid |
(558) |
(1 691) |
(1 895) |
(2 123) |
(2 380) |
|
Free cash flow to equity |
(1 592) |
(574) |
523 |
785 |
872 |
|
Working capital facility drawn |
1 800 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Net movement in cash |
208 |
(574) |
523 |
785 |
872 |
|
Opening cash |
2 400 |
2 608 |
2 034 |
2 557 |
3 342 |
|
Closing cash |
2 608 |
2 034 |
2 557 |
3 342 |
4 214 |
Free cash flow to equity is negative in Years 1 and 2 and turns positive in Year 3, accumulating to R13 610 across the five years against R6.30 million subscribed. In plain terms the equity is not repaid from operations within the projection period at all, which is why Section 14 concludes that the terminal value is not one of several return sources but the entire return.
Working capital absorbs cash in every year of the projection — R1.37 million in Year 1 and R0.37 million by Year 5 — because the debtor book grows faster than trade credit as revenue rises. That is the structural characteristic of a growing manufacturer selling on credit terms, and it is the reason the committed facility exists.
11.4 Projected balance sheet
|
R’000, at year end |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plant, equipment and yard, net of depreciation |
13 558 |
12 051 |
10 545 |
9 038 |
7 532 |
|
Raw material inventory |
1 590 |
2 035 |
2 424 |
2 739 |
3 024 |
|
Trade debtors |
3 873 |
4 891 |
5 748 |
6 409 |
6 979 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
2 608 |
2 034 |
2 557 |
3 342 |
4 214 |
|
Total assets |
21 629 |
21 011 |
21 274 |
21 528 |
21 749 |
|
Share capital |
6 300 |
6 300 |
6 300 |
6 300 |
6 300 |
|
Retained earnings / (accumulated loss) |
(1 174) |
(840) |
700 |
2 558 |
4 676 |
|
Total shareholders’ funds |
5 126 |
5 460 |
7 000 |
8 858 |
10 976 |
|
Development finance term loan |
8 500 |
7 439 |
6 257 |
4 938 |
3 467 |
|
Asset-based equipment finance |
3 056 |
2 426 |
1 714 |
909 |
— |
|
Working capital facility |
1 800 |
1 800 |
1 800 |
1 800 |
1 800 |
|
Trade and other payables |
3 146 |
3 886 |
4 503 |
5 023 |
5 505 |
|
Total liabilities |
16 502 |
15 551 |
14 274 |
12 670 |
10 773 |
|
Total equity and liabilities |
21 629 |
21 011 |
21 274 |
21 528 |
21 749 |
Total assets are broadly flat at R21 million to R22 million across the projection: depreciation of R1.51 million a year on the plant is offset by growth in debtors, inventory and cash, so the composition shifts from fixed assets toward working capital rather than the balance sheet growing. Shareholders’ funds fall from R6.30 million to R5.13 million in Year 1 as the loss is absorbed, then recover to R10.98 million by Year 5.