XTXFX Business Plan — Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis

How the plan responds to credit loss, volume, funding cost and collection rates moving against it, with downside and upside cases.

Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis

Jump to section
On this page

  • 13.1 Single-variable sensitivity
  • 13.2 Scenarios

13.1 Single-variable sensitivity

Year 5 profit after tax — single-variable sensitivity
Figure 21. Year 5 profit after tax — single-variable sensitivity.

Variable moved

Favourable

Adverse

Swing

Adverse case profitable?

Credit loss rate ±2.0 points

R23.0m

R7.6m

15.4m

Yes

Revenue ±10%

R26.1m

R3.6m

22.6m

Yes

Fixed operating costs ∓10%

R18.2m

R13.8m

4.4m

Yes

Variable costs ∓15%

R18.2m

R13.8m

4.4m

Yes

Cost of debt ∓300bps

R18.2m

R13.8m

4.4m

Yes

  • Credit loss is the dominant variable and the only one that can turn the business loss-making on its own. A two-point movement swings Year 5 profit after tax by R20.8 million against a base of R16.0 million. Nothing else in the model comes close.
  • Revenue is the second exposure, and it is partly outside management’s control. A 10 per cent shortfall costs R10.1 million, and the largest component of revenue erosion is not volume but the real decay of prescribed fees that management cannot influence at all.
  • Cost discipline matters but cannot rescue a credit problem. A 10 per cent movement in fixed costs is worth R2.2 million and a 15 per cent movement in variable costs R2.2 million. Both are meaningful; neither offsets a single point of loss rate.
  • Funding cost is the smallest sensitivity in the table. A 300 basis point movement in the cost of debt moves Year 5 profit by R2.2 million. Cheaper funding is worth having but it is not where this investment is won.
Year 5 profit before tax across credit loss and revenue
Figure 22. Year 5 profit before tax across credit loss and revenue.

The grid shows the interaction. At the base revenue the business tolerates a loss rate of roughly 15.3 per cent before profit before tax turns negative; at revenue 15 per cent below plan it tolerates only about 11.6 per cent, which is the base case itself. Revenue shortfall and credit deterioration are not independent risks that can be considered separately: a lender that misses volume is under pressure to loosen cut-offs, which produces exactly the loss deterioration the grid says it cannot afford.

13.2 Scenarios

Year 5 profit after tax across scenarios
Figure 23. Year 5 profit after tax across scenarios.

Scenario

Definition

Year 5 loss rate

Year 5 profit after tax

Base

The plan as presented: Term priced at 23.0% within the 24.85% ceiling, losses at 11.59% of disbursements.

11.6%

R16.0m

Fee erosion

Prescribed fees remain frozen while costs inflate — the real value of 43% of revenue erodes.

11.6%

R8.8m

Volume shortfall

Origination 15% below plan; the fixed cost base and the compliance stack do not shrink with it.

11.6%

(R3.2m)

Credit deterioration

Credit losses two points above plan — the scorecard underperforms its benchmark calibration.

13.6%

R7.6m

Losses and volume

Credit two points worse and origination 15% light in the same year.

13.6%

(R12.8m)