Section 12 · Business Plan
Financial Plan
Capital expenditure, capital structure and funding, the projected income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, debt-service coverage and key ratios, and sensitivity analysis.
12.1 Capital Expenditure Budget
| CAPEX Component | Amount (ZAR M) | % of Total | Notes |
| Solar Modules (Tier 1 Bifacial) | 500.0 | 27.0% | ~210,000 modules, CIF delivered |
| Tracking System | 205.0 | 11.1% | Single-axis, terrain-optimised |
| Inverters & Electrical BOS | 260.0 | 14.1% | Central + string hybrid |
| Civil Works & BOP | 220.0 | 11.9% | Foundations, roads, fencing |
| Grid Connection & Substation | 296.0 | 16.0% | 132kV, per Eskom quote |
| Development Costs | 92.0 | 5.0% | EIA, legal, advisory, permits |
| Project Management & Engineering | 55.0 | 3.0% | Owner’s engineer, PMC |
| Contingency (10%) | 148.0 | 8.0% | Risk buffer on construction |
| Working Capital & Reserves | 74.0 | 4.0% | Debt service reserve, O&M reserve |
| Total Project Cost | 1,850.0 | 100.0% |
Table 9: Capital Expenditure Budget
12.2 Capital Structure and
Funding
| Funding Source | Amount (ZAR M) | % of Total | Indicative Terms |
| Senior Secured Debt | 1,295.0 | 70% | JIBAR + 350bps, 18-yr tenor, 2-yr grace |
| Subordinated Debt / Mezzanine | 0.0 | 0% | Not required (base case) |
| Sponsor Equity | 388.5 | 21% | Founding shareholders + PE investors |
| DFI Equity | 111.0 | 6% | IFC/AfDB equity window |
| Community Trust | 55.5 | 3% | Funded via sponsor or DFI grant |
| Total Funding | 1,850.0 | 100% |
Table 10: Capital Structure
The 70/30 debt-to-equity ratio is standard for South African
utility-scale solar projects and is comfortably within the parameters
accepted by major project finance lenders. Senior debt will be sourced
from a combination of South African commercial banks (Nedbank, Standard
Bank, ABSA, or Investec, all of whom have active renewable energy
lending desks), the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA), the
African Development Bank (AfDB), and the International Finance
Corporation (IFC). The debt tenor of 18 years with a 2-year grace period
aligns with the PPA revenue profile, and the interest rate of JIBAR plus
350 basis points reflects current market pricing for REIPPPP solar
projects with investment-grade off-take structures.
12.3 Projected Profit and
Loss Statement
The income statement reflects the project’s profile as a
capital-intensive infrastructure asset with high operating margins,
predictable revenue growth driven by CPI-indexed PPA tariffs, and a
stable cost base. The project reaches net profitability in Year 3 (first
full year of operations) and achieves an EBITDA margin of approximately
71% by Year 5 as operating efficiencies are realised.
| Profit & Loss (ZAR Millions) | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 10 |
| PPA Revenue | — | 35.2 | 138.0 | 148.5 | 155.5 | 218.2 |
| REC & Carbon Revenue | — | 3.8 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 11.2 | 14.2 |
| Other Revenue | — | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Revenue | 0.0 | 42.5 | 145.2 | 155.8 | 166.7 | 232.4 |
| O&M Costs | — | (5.8) | (10.5) | (11.0) | (11.5) | (14.2) |
| Insurance | — | (4.8) | (8.5) | (8.8) | (9.0) | (10.5) |
| Land Lease | — | (2.2) | (4.2) | (4.3) | (4.5) | (5.2) |
| Grid Charges | — | (2.0) | (3.8) | (3.9) | (4.0) | (5.0) |
| Admin & Management | — | (1.8) | (3.2) | (3.3) | (3.5) | (4.2) |
| Community Development | — | (0.8) | (1.5) | (1.5) | (1.6) | (2.0) |
| Total Operating Expenses | (4.5) | (17.4) | (31.7) | (32.8) | (34.1) | (41.1) |
| EBITDA | (4.5) | 25.1 | 113.5 | 123.0 | 132.6 | 191.3 |
| EBITDA Margin | n/a | 59.1% | 78.2% | 78.9% | 79.5% | 82.3% |
| Depreciation | — | (18.5) | (55.5) | (55.5) | (55.5) | (55.5) |
| Interest Expense | (12.0) | (48.5) | (82.0) | (78.5) | (75.0) | (55.2) |
| Profit Before Tax | (16.5) | (41.9) | (24.0) | (11.0) | 2.1 | 80.6 |
| Tax (28%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (22.6) |
| Assessed Loss Utilised | — | — | — | — | 2.1 | 15.5 |
| Net Profit / (Loss) | (16.5) | (41.9) | (24.0) | (11.0) | 2.1 | 58.0 |
Table 11: Five-Year + Year 10 Projected Profit and Loss
12.4 Projected Balance Sheet
The balance sheet is characterised by the large fixed asset base
typical of infrastructure projects, progressive deleveraging as senior
debt is amortised, and the build-up of retained earnings and cash
reserves over time. The debt-to-equity ratio improves from 2.3x at
financial close to below 1.0x by Year 15, reflecting the structured
amortisation profile of the project finance debt.
| Balance Sheet (ZAR Millions) | Year 1 | Year 3 | Year 5 | Year 10 | Year 15 | Year 20 |
| ASSETS | ||||||
| Property, Plant & Equipment | 1,776 | 1,665 | 1,554 | 1,277 | 999 | 722 |
| Intangible Assets | 35 | 28 | 22 | 12 | 5 | 1 |
| Total Non-Current Assets | 1,811 | 1,693 | 1,576 | 1,289 | 1,004 | 723 |
| Cash & Equivalents | 85 | 62 | 38 | 35 | 32 | 30 |
| Trade Receivables | 12 | 18 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 16 |
| Debt Service Reserve | 12 | 15 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 11 |
| Total Current Assets | 109 | 95 | 64 | 61 | 56 | 57 |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 1,920 | 1,788 | 1,640 | 1,350 | 1,060 | 780 |
| EQUITY & LIABILITIES | ||||||
| Share Capital | 555 | 555 | 555 | 555 | 555 | 555 |
| Retained Earnings | (16.5) | (82.4) | (80.3) | 120 | 385 | 690 |
| Total Equity | 538.5 | 472.6 | 474.7 | 675 | 940 | 1,245 |
| Long-Term Debt | 1,270 | 1,195 | 1,045 | 565 | 75 | 0 |
| Current Portion of Debt | 25 | 35 | 40 | 50 | 45 | 0 |
| Trade Payables | 52 | 50 | 42 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Liabilities | 34.5 | 35.4 | 38.3 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Liabilities | 1,381.5 | 1,315.4 | 1,165.3 | 675 | 120 | 0 |
| TOTAL EQUITY & LIABILITIES | 1,920 | 1,788 | 1,640 | 1,350 | 1,060 | 780* |
Table 12: Projected Balance Sheet
12.5 Projected Cash Flow
Statement
| Cash Flow (ZAR Millions) | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 5 | Year 10 | Year 15 |
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
| Net Profit / (Loss) | (16.5) | (41.9) | (24.0) | 2.1 | 58.0 | 82.5 |
| Add: Depreciation | — | 18.5 | 55.5 | 55.5 | 55.5 | 55.5 |
| Add: Interest Expense | 12.0 | 48.5 | 82.0 | 75.0 | 55.2 | 28.0 |
| Working Capital Changes | (2.0) | (5.2) | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Cash from Operations | (6.5) | 19.9 | 117.0 | 133.8 | 169.2 | 166.3 |
| Interest Paid | (12.0) | (48.5) | (82.0) | (75.0) | (55.2) | (28.0) |
| Tax Paid | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (18.5) | (38.8) |
| Net Operating Cash Flow | (18.5) | (28.6) | 35.0 | 58.8 | 95.5 | 99.5 |
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
| Capital Expenditure | (1,350) | (500) | 0.0 | (5.0) | (8.0) | (5.0) |
| Net Investing Cash Flow | (1,350) | (500) | 0.0 | (5.0) | (8.0) | (5.0) |
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
| Equity Raised | 555.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Debt Drawdown | 970.0 | 325.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Debt Repayment | 0.0 | (25.0) | (30.0) | (40.0) | (50.0) | (45.0) |
| Dividends Paid | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (12.0) | (35.0) | (48.0) |
| Net Financing Cash Flow | 1,525.0 | 300.0 | (30.0) | (52.0) | (85.0) | (93.0) |
| Net Change in Cash | 156.5 | (228.6) | 5.0 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| Opening Cash Balance | 0.0 | 156.5 | 62.0 | 36.2 | 32.5 | 30.5 |
| Closing Cash Balance | 156.5 | 62.0 | 67.0 | 38.0 | 35.0 | 32.0 |
Table 13: Projected Cash Flow Statement
12.6 Debt
Service Coverage and Key Financial Ratios
The project’s debt service coverage ratio trajectory demonstrates
comfortable compliance with lender covenants throughout the debt tenor.
The minimum DSCR of 1.35x occurs in Year 3 (first full year of debt
service), rising progressively as CPI-indexed revenue grows while
fixed-rate debt service remains constant. The average DSCR of 1.65x
provides lenders with a healthy buffer against downside scenarios.
| Financial Metric | Year 3 | Year 5 | Year 10 | Year 15 | Year 20 |
| DSCR | 1.35x | 1.48x | 1.82x | 2.15x | n/a (debt repaid) |
| EBITDA Margin | 78.2% | 79.5% | 82.3% | 84.5% | 85.8% |
| Net Margin | -16.5% | 1.3% | 25.0% | 35.5% | 42.0% |
| Debt-to-Equity | 2.6x | 2.3x | 0.9x | 0.1x | 0.0x |
| Return on Equity | -5.1% | 0.4% | 8.6% | 8.8% | 6.6% |
| Revenue per MW (ZAR M) | 1.45 | 1.67 | 2.32 | 3.03 | 3.96 |
| Capacity Factor | 27.4% | 27.0% | 26.3% | 25.6% | 24.9% |
Table 14: Key Financial Ratios
12.7 Sensitivity Analysis
The sensitivity analysis evaluates the project IRR under a range of
scenarios affecting the key value drivers: solar resource variability,
construction cost, and PPA tariff. The base case achieves a project IRR
of 16.8%, comfortably exceeding the 15% minimum return typically
required by infrastructure equity investors. Even under a combined
downside scenario of 10% lower irradiation and 15% cost overrun, the
project IRR remains above 11%, demonstrating the investment’s resilience
to adverse conditions.
| Sensitivity Variable | Downside | Base Case | Upside | IRR Impact |
| Solar Resource (P50 vs P90) | -10% | P50 | +5% | ±4.0pp |
| Construction Cost | +15% | Budget | -10% | ±3.3pp |
| PPA Tariff | -10% | R0.62/kWh | +10% | ±3.6pp |
| CPI Escalation | 4% | 5.5% | 7% | ±1.8pp |
| Interest Rate (JIBAR+) | 450bps | 350bps | 250bps | ±1.2pp |
| Construction Delay | +3 months | On schedule | -3 months | ±0.7pp |
Table 15: Sensitivity Analysis Summary
Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of Solstice Energy (Pty) Ltd.