KarooPrime Capretto — Business Model

The revenue streams, the unit economics and value capture and the farmer value proposition underpinning KarooPrime Capretto’s vertically-integrated model.

KarooPrime Capretto Business PlanSection 6 › Business Model

Section 6 · Business Plan

Business Model

The revenue streams, the unit economics and value capture and the farmer value proposition underpinning KarooPrime Capretto’s vertically-integrated model.

KarooPrime’s business model monetises control of an integrated value
chain across four revenue streams while paying farmers a fair, reliable
price for animals that would otherwise be sold informally at a discount.
The model is designed so that each incremental head processed
contributes to fixed-cost absorption, driving the EBITDA-margin
expansion visible across the planning horizon.

6.1 Revenue streams

The four streams scale at different rates. Carcass and value-added
domestic sales anchor early revenue; export cuts ramp as certification
and buyer relationships mature; by-products grow proportionally with
throughput. The chart below shows the modelled stream composition across
the seven-year horizon.

Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1 — Revenue composition by stream (base case). Diversification reduces reliance on any single channel.
Revenue stream (R’m) Year 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 7
Carcass & primal (domestic) 49 143 288 414
Value-added retail (branded) 17 74 216 391
Export cuts (Halaal cold-chain) 17 62 158 265
By-products (skins, offal, rendering) 11 31 58 81
Total revenue 95 310 720 1,150

Table 6.1 — Revenue by stream at selected years (ZAR
million).

6.2 Unit economics and value capture

The blended realisation per head rises from approximately R2,375 in
Year 1 to about R2,875 at steady state as the mix shifts toward
value-added and export product. Livestock procurement is the single
largest cost line (the fair price paid to farmers), followed by feedlot
finishing and feed — the line most exposed to maize-price movements and
therefore the focus of the downside scenario.

Key model assumption — feed-cost exposure

Feedlot finishing and feed costs are linked to maize prices, which in
South Africa track import/export parity. The downside scenario applies an import-parity maize squeeze,
compressing Year-7 EBITDA margin from 20% to ~13.6% and project IRR to
19.8%. Management should consider forward feed-procurement and on-farm
fodder strategies to dampen this exposure.

6.3 The farmer value proposition

The model is only as reliable as its supply. KarooPrime offers
contracted farmers a compelling, durable proposition: a guaranteed,
fair, transparent price; reliable scheduled offtake that converts
livestock into predictable income; access to veterinary inputs, breeding
stock and training; and, through the producer-development trust, a
pathway to shared equity value. This proposition is the mechanism by
which informal supply is converted into a dependable commercial pipeline
— and it is the same mechanism that makes the venture genuinely
developmental.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of KarooPrime Capretto (Pty) Ltd.