AeroSphere — Funding Requirement & Investor Returns

The ZAR 6.8 billion capital structure across senior debt, mezzanine, sponsor and DFI equity and grants, the projected returns, the sensitivity analysis and the exit and liquidity options.

AeroSphere Business PlanSection 14 › Funding Requirement & Investor Returns

Section 14 · Business Plan

Funding Requirement & Investor Returns

The ZAR 6.8 billion capital structure across senior debt, mezzanine, sponsor and DFI equity and grants, the projected returns, the sensitivity analysis and the exit and liquidity options.

AeroSphere is seeking ZAR 6.8 billion in phased capital. The
structure blends senior debt, mezzanine finance, sponsor and
strategic/DFI equity, and a modest component of grants and locational
incentives, optimising the weighted cost of capital while preserving
lender protection and equity upside.

13.1 Capital Structure

Instrument Amount (R bn) Share Indicative terms
Senior debt 3.20 47% Long tenor, secured, amortising
Mezzanine 0.90 13% Subordinated, higher coupon
Sponsor equity 1.70 25% Ordinary, long-term
DFI / strategic equity 0.70 10% Ordinary, board seat
Grants & incentives 0.30 4% Non-dilutive
Total 6.80 100% Blended, phased
Figure 13.1
Figure 13.1 — Sources and uses of funds (ZAR billions).

13.2 Projected Returns

On the base-case projections, the platform delivers a blended project
IRR of approximately 24% over a ten-year hold, with sponsor equity
earning a higher risk-adjusted return reflecting its junior position.
The returns are underpinned by growing operating cash flows and a
substantial terminal value driven by the long-dated, inflation-linked
property and infrastructure asset base.

Figure 13.2
Figure 13.2 — Projected IRR and money-on-invested-capital (MOIC) by investor class (10-year hold).
Investor class IRR MOIC Risk position
Sponsor equity ~27.5% ~3.4x Junior / highest upside
DFI / strategic equity ~21.0% ~2.6x Ordinary equity
Mezzanine ~16.5% ~1.9x Subordinated debt
Blended project ~24.0% ~3.0x Whole-of-project

13.3 Sensitivity Analysis

The base-case IRR is tested against the key value drivers. The
project is most sensitive to passenger volume and non-aeronautical
yield, and least sensitive to the debt margin and exit multiple.
Critically, even under the modelled downside cases the project remains
comfortably above the cost of capital, reflecting the de-risking benefit
of revenue diversification and phased deployment.

Figure 13.3
Figure 13.3 — Equity-IRR sensitivity to key value drivers (tornado chart).

13.4 Exit & Liquidity Options

The Company envisages several credible liquidity pathways for equity
investors: a trade sale to an infrastructure or airport operator; a sale
to an infrastructure fund or pension allocator seeking long-dated,
inflation-linked yield; a partial recapitalisation once cash flows
mature; or, over a longer horizon, a public listing of the platform. The
hard-asset base and contracted cash flows support a strong terminal
valuation under each scenario.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of AeroSphere Gateway Holdings (Pty) Ltd.