PrimePork Foods — Appendices

Supporting appendices - the key ratio dashboard, the senior-debt amortisation schedules, the Year-1 quarterly ramp profile, the downside scenario, the assumptions register, the combined-shock EBITDA-margin matrix, the sources and the debt-service-reserve mechanics underpinning the PrimePork business plan and financial model.

PrimePork Foods Business PlanSection 16 › Appendices

Section 16 · Business Plan

Appendices

Supporting appendices – the key ratio dashboard, the senior-debt amortisation schedules, the Year-1 quarterly ramp profile, the downside scenario, the assumptions register, the combined-shock EBITDA-margin matrix, the sources and the debt-service-reserve mechanics underpinning the PrimePork business plan and financial model.

Appendix A — Key Ratio Dashboard

Ratio Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10
Revenue growth % 91 78 70 51 13 9 6 4 4
EBITDA margin % 11.4 15.8 18.7 21.3 23.8 24.2 24.5 24.7 24.8 24.8
NPAT margin % -10.6 2.8 7.9 11.3 14.6 15.5 15.9 16.4 16.6 16.7
DSCR (x) -0.15 0.83 1.60 2.88 5.63 9.96 12.07 14.15 16.30 18.64
Net debt / EBITDA (x) 7.3 3.3 1.7 0.7 0.0 net cash net cash net cash net cash net cash
Debt / equity (x) 2.02 1.97 1.40 0.66 0.20 0.10 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.00
ROE % -21.8 9.8 33.4 44.7 46.8 35.9 28.7 23.8 20.1 17.3
ROA % -7.2 3.3 13.9 26.9 39.0 32.6 27.2 23.2 19.9 17.3
Interest cover (EBITDA/int) 1.1 2.8 5.4 9.7 19.2 39.9 55.0 78.4 123.5 256.1
Capex / revenue % 130 13 9 7 3 2 2 1 1 1

Appendix B — Senior Debt Amortisation Schedules

IDC senior facility — R145m, 11.25%, 10-year, 1-year principal
grace

  Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10
Opening 145 145 129 113 97 81 64 48 32 16
Interest 16.3 16.3 14.5 12.7 10.9 9.1 7.3 5.4 3.6 1.8
Principal 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1
Closing 145 129 113 97 81 64 48 32 16 0

DBSA development loan — R95m, 10.75%, 10-year, 1-year principal
grace

  Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10
Opening 95 95 84 74 63 53 42 32 21 11
Interest 10.2 10.2 9.1 7.9 6.8 5.7 4.5 3.4 2.3 1.1
Principal 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6
Closing 95 84 74 63 53 42 32 21 11 0

Appendix C — Year 1 Quarterly Ramp Profile

Year 1 revenue of R245m is back-loaded: plant commissioning and
certification run through the first three quarters, and processing only
reaches steady cadence late in the year. The quarterly profile
illustrates the working-capital reality behind the annual figure and the
case for the revolver and debt-service reserve.

R m Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Revenue 24 46 78 97
Cash opex (31) (44) (66) (80)
EBITDA (7) 2 12 17
Plant & equipment capex (120) (90) (70) (38)

Appendix D — Downside Scenario (Five-Year P&L)

The downside compounds a ramp shortfall (revenue reaching 75% of
plan) with an ASF/FMD-driven carcass-supply disruption and margin
compression: revenue −25% against base each year, EBITDA compressed by
~35% through operating deleverage. The revolver requirement roughly
doubles and the debt-service reserve is fully consumed through Year
3.

R m Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
Revenue (−25%) 184 351 626 1,065 1,613
EBITDA (−35%) 18 48 101 196 333
EBITDA margin % 9.9 13.7 16.2 18.4 20.6
Depreciation (27) (34) (42) (51) (54)
Interest (revolver 2x) (27) (34) (42) (36) (15)
Profit before tax (36) (20) 18 109 264
Taxation (1) (18) (71)
NPAT (36) (20) 17 91 193
Cumulative NPAT (36) (56) (39) 52 245
Downside reading

In the downside the enterprise remains a going concern but is
loss-making into Year 2–3 and wholly dependent on the debt-service
reserve and lender forbearance through the ramp. Cumulative losses
trough near R95m against R145m of equity — a buffer that survives but is
thinner than ideal, arguing for the larger equity/reserve cushion and,
above all, for contracted offtake floors before drawdown. This is the
case lenders should size security and reserves against, and it
underscores why the revenue ramp is the plan’s central diligence
item.

Appendix E — Assumptions Register

Every material assumption, its basis and sensitivity. Assumptions
marked ◆ are sponsor anchors preserved exactly; all others are
analyst-derived.

# Assumption Value Basis
1 Revenue Y1–Y5 ◆ R245m → R2,150m Sponsor; ~72% CAGR — key risk, §3.4
2 EBITDA Y1–Y5 ◆ R28m → R512m Sponsor; margin 11.4%→23.8%
3 Revenue growth Y6–Y10 13% → 3.5% Analyst maturity glide
4 Steady-state EBITDA margin 24.2–24.8% Within sponsor 18–27% band
5 Initial capacity ◆ 3,500 pigs/week Sponsor; R318m plant budget
6 Year 5 capacity ◆ 11,000+ pigs/week Sponsor
7 Capacity utilisation 62% → 88% Analyst ramp
8 Value-added share of output 12% → 32% Margin-mix driver §6.2
9 Carcass cost ~R31.8/kg RMAA Q1 2025 carcass price
10 Capex programme ◆ R318m + R67m WC Sponsor §6.6
11 Ongoing capex R36–95m p.a. Expansion + replacement
12 Plant depreciation 20-year Analyst; cold 15y, mach 10y, fleet 7y, tech 4y
13 IDC facility R145m, 11.25%, 10y, 1y grace Analyst structuring
14 DBSA facility R95m, 10.75%, 10y, 1y grace Analyst structuring
15 Revolver rate 11.75% Prime-linked WC facility
16 Corporate tax 27% + s20 (80% cap) Income Tax Act
17 Net working capital 13% of revenue Inventory, WIP, debtors §12.7
18 Minimum operating cash R12m Analyst liquidity floor
19 Exit multiple 6.5x EV/EBITDA Y10 SA food processing 5–8x
20 No dividends in horizon Full retention Conservative; funds deleveraging
21 Feed cost outlook Falling 2025–2026 BFAP; larger maize/soya crops

Appendix F — Combined-Shock EBITDA-Margin Matrix

Single-variable sensitivities understate processing risk because
throughput and margin shocks correlate. The matrix shows Year 3 EBITDA
(base R156m — the first covenant-test year) under simultaneous
throughput (utilisation) and gross-margin shocks. Cells sustaining DSCR
≥1.30x are viable without support (Year 3 base DSCR 1.60x).

Y3 EBITDA (R m) Margin +2pt Margin base Margin −2pt Margin −4pt
Throughput +10% 198 181 164 147
Throughput base 173 156 139 122
Throughput −10% 148 131 114 97
Throughput −20% 123 106 89 72

Reading: the first covenant test survives modest single shocks but
tightens under combined throughput-and-margin stress — the profile of a
disease-driven supply disruption coinciding with retail margin pressure.
This is the quantitative case for the funded debt-service reserve, the
covenant holiday to Year 3 and contracted offtake floors. From Year 4
the widening cover (2.88x) absorbs these shocks comfortably; the
vulnerability is strictly a ramp-period phenomenon.

Appendix G — Sources

  • SAPPO — Pork Industry Quarterly (Q1 & Q2 2025): carcass price
    ~R31.80/kg; slaughter trends; production/consumption
  • SAPPO / Farmer’s Weekly (2026) — five ASF and seventeen FMD
    commercial outbreaks; ~R9,500/sow loss per FMD event; 12+ week abattoir
    delay; welfare code and 2032 gestation-crate phase-out
  • BFAP — Trajectories of SA’s Red Meat Industry (2025): pork
    +3.2%/yr per-capita to 5.4kg; 393kt consumption by 2035; feed-cost
    outlook
  • RMAA — pork carcass price series (excluding sows)
  • Stats SA / TradeDATA — meat retail price indices; pork’s lowest
    red-meat inflation 2025–2026
  • BFAP — Pork Value Chain Study: 7:3 baconer/porker ratio; ~78kg
    slaughter mass; ~10% informal undercount
  • NAMC — pork consumption and consumer-education analysis
  • Best Pork and integrated-processor public sources — operating
    model, Danish-European deboning, export certification informing the
    operating architecture

Appendix H — Debt-Service Reserve Mechanics

The reserve resolves the ramp-period DSCR problem in Section 12.5.
Approximately R55 million of the equity subscription is escrowed at
close in a lender-controlled account and released against the senior
debt-service bill through Years 1–2; CFADS shortfalls draw the reserve,
surpluses stay in operations. The schedule shows the reserve covering
the ramp until organic CFADS takes over from Year 3.

R m Y1 H1 Y1 H2 Y2 H1 Y2 H2 Y3 (ref)
Opening reserve 55.0 41.0 27.0 16.0 6.0
Senior debt service due 13.3 13.3 15.5 15.5 36.5 (full yr)
CFADS contribution −1.0 −1.0 4.5 5.5 58.4 (full yr)
Reserve drawn 14.0 14.0 11.0 10.0
Closing reserve 41.0 27.0 16.0 6.0 6.0 released

Half-yearly figures are illustrative pro-rations of the annual model.
The design intent is auditable simplicity: lenders see a funded,
controlled account rather than a projection, and equity sees the
residual released once the Year 3 covenant test is passed. From Year 3,
CFADS of R58.4m against total debt service of R36.5m restores cover to
1.60x at the first unaided test, consistent with Figure 18.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of PrimePork Foods South Africa (Pty) Ltd.