PrimePork Foods — Appendices
Supporting appendices - the key ratio dashboard, the senior-debt amortisation schedules, the Year-1 quarterly ramp profile, the downside scenario, the assumptions register, the combined-shock EBITDA-margin matrix, the sources and the debt-service-reserve mechanics underpinning the PrimePork business plan and financial model.
Section 16 · Business Plan
Appendices
Supporting appendices – the key ratio dashboard, the senior-debt amortisation schedules, the Year-1 quarterly ramp profile, the downside scenario, the assumptions register, the combined-shock EBITDA-margin matrix, the sources and the debt-service-reserve mechanics underpinning the PrimePork business plan and financial model.
Appendix A — Key Ratio Dashboard
| Ratio | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth % | – | 91 | 78 | 70 | 51 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| EBITDA margin % | 11.4 | 15.8 | 18.7 | 21.3 | 23.8 | 24.2 | 24.5 | 24.7 | 24.8 | 24.8 |
| NPAT margin % | -10.6 | 2.8 | 7.9 | 11.3 | 14.6 | 15.5 | 15.9 | 16.4 | 16.6 | 16.7 |
| DSCR (x) | -0.15 | 0.83 | 1.60 | 2.88 | 5.63 | 9.96 | 12.07 | 14.15 | 16.30 | 18.64 |
| Net debt / EBITDA (x) | 7.3 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | net cash | net cash | net cash | net cash | net cash |
| Debt / equity (x) | 2.02 | 1.97 | 1.40 | 0.66 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| ROE % | -21.8 | 9.8 | 33.4 | 44.7 | 46.8 | 35.9 | 28.7 | 23.8 | 20.1 | 17.3 |
| ROA % | -7.2 | 3.3 | 13.9 | 26.9 | 39.0 | 32.6 | 27.2 | 23.2 | 19.9 | 17.3 |
| Interest cover (EBITDA/int) | 1.1 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 9.7 | 19.2 | 39.9 | 55.0 | 78.4 | 123.5 | 256.1 |
| Capex / revenue % | 130 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Appendix B — Senior Debt Amortisation Schedules
IDC senior facility — R145m, 11.25%, 10-year, 1-year principal
grace
| Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening | 145 | 145 | 129 | 113 | 97 | 81 | 64 | 48 | 32 | 16 |
| Interest | 16.3 | 16.3 | 14.5 | 12.7 | 10.9 | 9.1 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 3.6 | 1.8 |
| Principal | – | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 |
| Closing | 145 | 129 | 113 | 97 | 81 | 64 | 48 | 32 | 16 | 0 |
DBSA development loan — R95m, 10.75%, 10-year, 1-year principal
grace
| Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening | 95 | 95 | 84 | 74 | 63 | 53 | 42 | 32 | 21 | 11 |
| Interest | 10.2 | 10.2 | 9.1 | 7.9 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 1.1 |
| Principal | – | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Closing | 95 | 84 | 74 | 63 | 53 | 42 | 32 | 21 | 11 | 0 |
Appendix C — Year 1 Quarterly Ramp Profile
Year 1 revenue of R245m is back-loaded: plant commissioning and
certification run through the first three quarters, and processing only
reaches steady cadence late in the year. The quarterly profile
illustrates the working-capital reality behind the annual figure and the
case for the revolver and debt-service reserve.
| R m | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 24 | 46 | 78 | 97 |
| Cash opex | (31) | (44) | (66) | (80) |
| EBITDA | (7) | 2 | 12 | 17 |
| Plant & equipment capex | (120) | (90) | (70) | (38) |
Appendix D — Downside Scenario (Five-Year P&L)
The downside compounds a ramp shortfall (revenue reaching 75% of
plan) with an ASF/FMD-driven carcass-supply disruption and margin
compression: revenue −25% against base each year, EBITDA compressed by
~35% through operating deleverage. The revolver requirement roughly
doubles and the debt-service reserve is fully consumed through Year
3.
| R m | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (−25%) | 184 | 351 | 626 | 1,065 | 1,613 |
| EBITDA (−35%) | 18 | 48 | 101 | 196 | 333 |
| EBITDA margin % | 9.9 | 13.7 | 16.2 | 18.4 | 20.6 |
| Depreciation | (27) | (34) | (42) | (51) | (54) |
| Interest (revolver 2x) | (27) | (34) | (42) | (36) | (15) |
| Profit before tax | (36) | (20) | 18 | 109 | 264 |
| Taxation | – | – | (1) | (18) | (71) |
| NPAT | (36) | (20) | 17 | 91 | 193 |
| Cumulative NPAT | (36) | (56) | (39) | 52 | 245 |
In the downside the enterprise remains a going concern but is
loss-making into Year 2–3 and wholly dependent on the debt-service
reserve and lender forbearance through the ramp. Cumulative losses
trough near R95m against R145m of equity — a buffer that survives but is
thinner than ideal, arguing for the larger equity/reserve cushion and,
above all, for contracted offtake floors before drawdown. This is the
case lenders should size security and reserves against, and it
underscores why the revenue ramp is the plan’s central diligence
item.
Appendix E — Assumptions Register
Every material assumption, its basis and sensitivity. Assumptions
marked ◆ are sponsor anchors preserved exactly; all others are
analyst-derived.
| # | Assumption | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revenue Y1–Y5 ◆ | R245m → R2,150m | Sponsor; ~72% CAGR — key risk, §3.4 |
| 2 | EBITDA Y1–Y5 ◆ | R28m → R512m | Sponsor; margin 11.4%→23.8% |
| 3 | Revenue growth Y6–Y10 | 13% → 3.5% | Analyst maturity glide |
| 4 | Steady-state EBITDA margin | 24.2–24.8% | Within sponsor 18–27% band |
| 5 | Initial capacity ◆ | 3,500 pigs/week | Sponsor; R318m plant budget |
| 6 | Year 5 capacity ◆ | 11,000+ pigs/week | Sponsor |
| 7 | Capacity utilisation | 62% → 88% | Analyst ramp |
| 8 | Value-added share of output | 12% → 32% | Margin-mix driver §6.2 |
| 9 | Carcass cost | ~R31.8/kg | RMAA Q1 2025 carcass price |
| 10 | Capex programme ◆ | R318m + R67m WC | Sponsor §6.6 |
| 11 | Ongoing capex | R36–95m p.a. | Expansion + replacement |
| 12 | Plant depreciation | 20-year | Analyst; cold 15y, mach 10y, fleet 7y, tech 4y |
| 13 | IDC facility | R145m, 11.25%, 10y, 1y grace | Analyst structuring |
| 14 | DBSA facility | R95m, 10.75%, 10y, 1y grace | Analyst structuring |
| 15 | Revolver rate | 11.75% | Prime-linked WC facility |
| 16 | Corporate tax | 27% + s20 (80% cap) | Income Tax Act |
| 17 | Net working capital | 13% of revenue | Inventory, WIP, debtors §12.7 |
| 18 | Minimum operating cash | R12m | Analyst liquidity floor |
| 19 | Exit multiple | 6.5x EV/EBITDA Y10 | SA food processing 5–8x |
| 20 | No dividends in horizon | Full retention | Conservative; funds deleveraging |
| 21 | Feed cost outlook | Falling 2025–2026 | BFAP; larger maize/soya crops |
Appendix F — Combined-Shock EBITDA-Margin Matrix
Single-variable sensitivities understate processing risk because
throughput and margin shocks correlate. The matrix shows Year 3 EBITDA
(base R156m — the first covenant-test year) under simultaneous
throughput (utilisation) and gross-margin shocks. Cells sustaining DSCR
≥1.30x are viable without support (Year 3 base DSCR 1.60x).
| Y3 EBITDA (R m) | Margin +2pt | Margin base | Margin −2pt | Margin −4pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput +10% | 198 | 181 | 164 | 147 |
| Throughput base | 173 | 156 | 139 | 122 |
| Throughput −10% | 148 | 131 | 114 | 97 |
| Throughput −20% | 123 | 106 | 89 | 72 |
Reading: the first covenant test survives modest single shocks but
tightens under combined throughput-and-margin stress — the profile of a
disease-driven supply disruption coinciding with retail margin pressure.
This is the quantitative case for the funded debt-service reserve, the
covenant holiday to Year 3 and contracted offtake floors. From Year 4
the widening cover (2.88x) absorbs these shocks comfortably; the
vulnerability is strictly a ramp-period phenomenon.
Appendix G — Sources
- SAPPO — Pork Industry Quarterly (Q1 & Q2 2025): carcass price
~R31.80/kg; slaughter trends; production/consumption - SAPPO / Farmer’s Weekly (2026) — five ASF and seventeen FMD
commercial outbreaks; ~R9,500/sow loss per FMD event; 12+ week abattoir
delay; welfare code and 2032 gestation-crate phase-out - BFAP — Trajectories of SA’s Red Meat Industry (2025): pork
+3.2%/yr per-capita to 5.4kg; 393kt consumption by 2035; feed-cost
outlook - RMAA — pork carcass price series (excluding sows)
- Stats SA / TradeDATA — meat retail price indices; pork’s lowest
red-meat inflation 2025–2026 - BFAP — Pork Value Chain Study: 7:3 baconer/porker ratio; ~78kg
slaughter mass; ~10% informal undercount - NAMC — pork consumption and consumer-education analysis
- Best Pork and integrated-processor public sources — operating
model, Danish-European deboning, export certification informing the
operating architecture
Appendix H — Debt-Service Reserve Mechanics
The reserve resolves the ramp-period DSCR problem in Section 12.5.
Approximately R55 million of the equity subscription is escrowed at
close in a lender-controlled account and released against the senior
debt-service bill through Years 1–2; CFADS shortfalls draw the reserve,
surpluses stay in operations. The schedule shows the reserve covering
the ramp until organic CFADS takes over from Year 3.
| R m | Y1 H1 | Y1 H2 | Y2 H1 | Y2 H2 | Y3 (ref) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening reserve | 55.0 | 41.0 | 27.0 | 16.0 | 6.0 |
| Senior debt service due | 13.3 | 13.3 | 15.5 | 15.5 | 36.5 (full yr) |
| CFADS contribution | −1.0 | −1.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 58.4 (full yr) |
| Reserve drawn | 14.0 | 14.0 | 11.0 | 10.0 | – |
| Closing reserve | 41.0 | 27.0 | 16.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 released |
Half-yearly figures are illustrative pro-rations of the annual model.
The design intent is auditable simplicity: lenders see a funded,
controlled account rather than a projection, and equity sees the
residual released once the Year 3 covenant test is passed. From Year 3,
CFADS of R58.4m against total debt service of R36.5m restores cover to
1.60x at the first unaided test, consistent with Figure 18.
Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of PrimePork Foods South Africa (Pty) Ltd.