Sparkle Lane Business Plan — Funding
R1.40m founder equity, R2.40m growth equity at site two and R4.42m of loans and facilities across the rollout.
Funding
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. The Competitive Problem
- 3. Water: Compliance First, Saving Second
- 4. The Subscription Model
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. The Site and the Offer
- 7. Site Selection
- 8. Unit Economics
- 9. The Rollout and Its Gates
- 10. Funding
- 11. People and Operations
- 12. Compliance and Permits
- 13. Financial Projections
- 14. Break-Even
- 15. Sensitivity and Scenarios
- 16. Risk Management
- 17. Implementation Timeline
- 18. Returns
- 19. Key Performance Indicators
- 20. Key Assumptions
- 21. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Site Capital Schedule
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
- 10.1 Use of funds, one site
- 10.2 Debt and cover
|
Source |
Amount |
Drawn |
What to know |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Founder equity |
R1.40m |
Year 1 |
Meaningful owner contribution is expected where there is no trading history |
|
SEDFA small enterprise loan |
R800’000 |
Year 1 |
The merged Small Enterprise Development and Finance Agency. Requires CIPC registration, SARS tax compliance and a proposal in their format |
|
Equipment finance, site one |
R540’000 |
Year 1 |
Asset-backed against pressure washers, vacuums, polishers and the recycling plant |
|
Working capital facility |
R900’000 |
Year 2 |
Drawn to fund the subscription launch and the second-site preparation |
|
Equipment finance, site two |
R780’000 |
Year 3 |
Asset-backed on the second site’s plant and equipment |
|
Growth equity, site two |
R2.40m |
Year 3 |
A partner rather than more debt at the point of expansion |
|
Bank term loan, site three |
R1.40m |
Year 5 |
Available once there is a two-site trading record |
|
Total funding raised |
R8.22m |
Against R6.46m of net capital expenditure |
Total funding raised across the five years is R8.22 million against R6.46 million of net capital expenditure. The R1.76 million difference funds the operating deficit in Years 1 and 2, when group overhead is carried on a single site, and the working capital reserve at each opening.
10.1 Use of funds, one site
|
Item |
R’000 |
Treatment |
|---|---|---|
|
Wash bay canopy, hardstand and drainage |
585 |
Capitalised |
|
Water recycling and treatment plant |
445 |
Capitalised |
|
Oil and silt separator, effluent compliance works |
165 |
Capitalised |
|
Pressure washers, foamers, vacuums and polishers |
295 |
Capitalised |
|
Reception, waiting area, POS and signage |
235 |
Capitalised |
|
Solar and inverter backup |
175 |
Capitalised |
|
Municipal approvals, permits and professional fees |
125 |
Capitalised |
|
Opening consumables and pre-opening payroll |
78 |
Expensed at opening |
|
Working capital reserve |
92 |
Working capital |
|
Total cost of a site |
2 195 |
|
|
Less landlord installation allowance |
(180) |
Negotiated in the lease |
|
Net cash requirement per site |
2 015 |
Of the R2.195 million, R2.025 million is capitalised as site works, plant and equipment, R78 000 of opening consumables and pre-opening payroll is charged to income in the year the site opens, and R92 000 funds opening working capital. Later sites escalate: R2.334 million at site two and R2.472 million at site three, against the same R180 000 allowance.
10.2 Debt and cover
|
R’000 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Loans drawn in the year |
1 340 |
900 |
780 |
— |
1 400 |
|
Interest |
79 |
221 |
321 |
343 |
356 |
|
Capital repaid |
— |
108 |
241 |
577 |
577 |
|
Total debt service |
79 |
329 |
562 |
920 |
933 |
|
Loans outstanding |
1 340 |
2 132 |
2 671 |
2 093 |
2 916 |
|
EBITDA |
(426) |
(119) |
142 |
765 |
1 363 |
|
Debt service cover |
n/m |
n/m |
0.25x |
0.83x |
1.46x |
|
Gate before site three |
1.30x |
1.30x |
1.30x |
1.30x |
1.30x |
Cover is not meaningful in Years 1 and 2 because group EBITDA is negative; interest is serviced from the funding raised. It is 0.25 times in Year 3, 0.83 times in Year 4 and 1.46 times in Year 5, clearing the 1.30 times gate set before the third site is built. A lender should note that the gate is met only in the year the third site is drawn down, which means the Year 4 result is the one that actually determines whether the rollout completes on schedule.