Thaba Goats Business Plan — Risk Management

The principal risks facing an extensive goat enterprise, from theft and predation to drought and disease, with the controls governing each.

Risk Management

Jump to section
On this page

  • 19.1 The risks that matter
  • 19.2 Risks sized against the plan
  • 19.3 Controls

19.1 The risks that matter

Drought is the risk that removes the grazing and the herd in the same season, and no amount of capital protects against it. It is managed by stocking below 85 per cent of assessed carrying capacity, by a lick and supplementary feed budget that can be doubled, by an established trader relationship that will take animals at short notice, and by an explicit rule that followers are sold before breeding does.

Kid mortality is the risk with the highest return on attention. Five percentage points is worth R89 000 a year at Year 5 scale, a quarter of the cash the business generates. It is managed by the kidding protocol in Section 9.2, by strategic dosing verified with faecal egg counts, and by gate conditions at every stage.

Grazing outrun by the herd is the risk that compounds. A herd that outgrows its veld overgrazes, condition drops, parasite burden rises and kid mortality climbs, one mistake producing four consequences. It is managed by fencing camps before the herd that will use them and by independent written confirmation of capacity at Gates 3 and 4.

Cash exhaustion while the herd grows is the risk specific to livestock. Reported EBITDA turns positive a year before cash EBITDA does. It is managed by sizing each stage raise to carry the stage, by reporting cash EBITDA alongside reported EBITDA in every table, and by the rule that breeding does are never sold to cover a shortfall.

Stock theft is endemic in the production provinces and is largely uninsurable at this scale. It is managed by night kraaling, perimeter integrity, a herding presence, registered branding and community relationships, the last of which is worth more than the fence.

19.2 Risks sized against the plan

Risk

Movement tested

Effect on Year 5 EBITDA

Effect on cash EBITDA

Residual position

Blended price

8% below plan

(R119k)

(R119k)

Cash EBITDA R245k; cover falls below 1.0x

Kids weaned per doe

0.15 below plan

(R97k)

(R60k)

Absorbable; gate conditions are the mitigation

Kid survival

5 points below plan

(R89k)

(R55k)

Absorbable at Year 5 scale; fatal at Stage 2

Doe mortality

4% to 8%

(R71k)

(R71k)

Breeding capacity lost, not just a sale

Fixed cost base

10% above plan

(R71k)

(R71k)

Absorbable; labour is the largest line

Direct cost

15% above plan

(R62k)

(R62k)

Feed and dosing; the last lines to cut

Drought

Grazing fails; feed doubles, 10% sold early

(R339k)

(R334k)

Cash EBITDA R30k; the facility moratoria carry it

19.3 Controls

  • No stage is drawn until every gate condition for the preceding stage is documented and satisfied.
  • Grazing capacity is confirmed in writing by a qualified assessor before each expansion, for the herd being created rather than the herd held.
  • Stocking rate is held below 85 per cent of assessed carrying capacity in every year.
  • Breeding does are not sold to cover a cash shortfall under any circumstance; followers are sold first and culls second.
  • Every birth, death, treatment and sale is recorded on the day it happens, and the register is reviewed monthly.
  • Covenants are set against cash EBITDA rather than reported EBITDA, and tested from Year 5.
  • No distribution is made to the founder beyond the owner remuneration in the fixed cost base until cover exceeds 1.25 times for four consecutive quarters.