Cryostead Logistics — Break-Even & Sensitivity Analysis
The break-even analysis demonstrates the occupancy threshold at which the facility achieves cash-flow neutrality. Based on the Company's cost structure, the break-even occupancy rate is approximately 58 to 62 percent, which the Company is projected to surpass during the second half of…
Section 10 · Business Plan
Break-Even & Sensitivity Analysis
The break-even analysis demonstrates the occupancy threshold at which the facility achieves cash-flow neutrality. Based on the Company's cost structure, the break-even occupancy rate is approximately 58 to 62 percent, which the Company is projected to surpass during the second half of…
10.1 Break-Even Analysis
The break-even analysis demonstrates the occupancy threshold at which the facility achieves cash-flow neutrality. Based on the Company’s cost structure, the break-even occupancy rate is approximately 58 to 62 percent, which the Company is projected to surpass during the second half of Year 1. This analysis excludes debt service obligations; including debt service, the full break-even threshold is approximately 72 to 75 percent, expected to be achieved in Year 2.
10.2 Sensitivity Analysis
The following scenario analysis illustrates the impact of occupancy variations on key investment return metrics:
| Scenario | Average Occupancy | Project IRR | Payback Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bear Case | 60% | 16% | 7.5 years |
| Base Case | 80% | 24–27% | 5.5 years |
| Bull Case | 95% | 30–34% | 4.2 years |
Key observations from the sensitivity analysis: Even under the bear case scenario (60% average occupancy), the project generates a positive IRR of 16%, exceeding the risk-free rate and providing adequate compensation for the investment risk. The base case delivers returns commensurate with infrastructure-grade investments, while the bull case reflects the significant upside potential of achieving near-full occupancy. The Company’s pre-launch anchor tenant strategy is specifically designed to mitigate the risk of the bear case scenario materialising.
10.3 Additional Sensitivities
The financial model has been stress-tested across additional variables:
-
Energy Cost Increase (+25%): Reduces Year 3 EBITDA margin by approximately 3 percentage points to 25%. Mitigated by solar PV installation and energy efficiency measures.
-
Interest Rate Increase (+200bps): Reduces project IRR by approximately 2 percentage points. The Company’s systematic deleveraging provides natural protection against interest rate increases over the medium term.
-
Rand Depreciation (15%): Increases replacement cost of imported refrigeration components but has negligible impact on recurring operating costs, which are predominantly Rand-denominated. Export client revenues may benefit from increased volumes.
-
Construction Cost Overrun (+10%): Increases total capital requirement to ZAR 154 million and reduces project IRR by approximately 1.5 percentage points. Mitigated by fixed-price construction contracts and contingency provisions.
This document contains proprietary and confidential information. Distribution without written consent is prohibited.