Springs Harvest Greenhouses — Sensitivity Analysis

The following sensitivity analysis examines the impact of variations in key assumptions on Year 3 financial performance, representing the first full year of stabilised operations with both Phase 1 and Phase 2 capacity.

Springs Harvest Greenhouses (Pty) Ltd Business PlanSection 14 › Sensitivity Analysis

Section 14 · Business Plan

Sensitivity Analysis

The following sensitivity analysis examines the impact of variations in key assumptions on Year 3 financial performance, representing the first full year of stabilised operations with both Phase 1 and Phase 2 capacity.

The following sensitivity analysis examines the impact of variations in key assumptions on Year 3 financial performance, representing the first full year of stabilised operations with both Phase 1 and Phase 2 capacity.

14.1 Revenue Sensitivity

Scenario Revenue (R’000) Gross Profit (R’000) EBITDA (R’000) Net Profit (R’000)
Base Case 19,600 8,624 5,880 2,687
Revenue −10% 17,640 7,762 5,018 2,058
Revenue −20% 15,680 6,899 4,155 1,429
Revenue +10% 21,560 9,486 6,742 3,316
Revenue +20% 23,520 10,349 7,605 3,945

14.2 Gross Margin Sensitivity

Scenario Gross Margin EBITDA (R’000) Net Profit (R’000) Net Margin
Base Case 44.0% 5,880 2,687 13.7%
Gross Margin 38.0% 38.0% 4,704 1,829 9.3%
Gross Margin 35.0% 35.0% 4,116 1,401 7.1%
Gross Margin 48.0% 48.0% 6,664 3,259 16.6%
Gross Margin 50.0% 50.0% 7,056 3,545 18.1%

The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the business remains profitable under moderately adverse scenarios. A 20% revenue decline from the base case still yields positive net income of R1.4 million. The break-even gross margin at base-case revenue is approximately 32–33%, providing a meaningful buffer against cost pressures or pricing headwinds.

This document contains proprietary and confidential information. Distribution without written consent is prohibited.