Umthombo Springs Business Plan — Series A Funding Adequacy
Because Series B is targeted for month 24, the Series A round must fund the entire first two years of the business, construction, commissioning, the…
Series A Funding Adequacy
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- Important Notice & Disclaimer
- Executive Summary
- The Company & the Water Source
- Market Analysis
- Products & Unit Economics
- Production & Operations
- Route to Market
- Quality, Certification & Compliance
- Sustainability & Water Stewardship
- Transformation & Community
- Management & Governance
- The Two-Series Funding Structure
- Series A Funding Adequacy
- Implementation Roadmap
- Competitive Positioning
- Financial Plan & Projections
- Capital Structure & Dilution
- Investor Returns & Sensitivity
- Risk Analysis & Independent Findings
- SWOT & Strategic Analysis
- Exit Strategy
- Key Performance Indicators
- Conclusion & The Investment Ask
- Annexure A: Detailed Financial Statements
- Annexure B: Assumptions Book
- Annexure C: Scenario & Sensitivity Detail
- Annexure D: Export Operations Manual
- Annexure E: Regulatory & Certification Register
- Annexure F: Series A & B Term Framework
- Annexure G: Detailed Risk Register
- Annexure H: Data Room Index
- Annexure I: Glossary & Investor Questions
Because Series B is targeted for month 24, the Series A round must fund the entire first two years of the business, construction, commissioning, the domestic launch, two years of operating losses, interest on the asset finance and the working capital that a growing trading business consumes. This section tests whether R48 million is sufficient for that period.
|
Requirement to month 24 |
Amount |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Capital expenditure |
R36.5m |
PET line, site and building, source development, water treatment, utilities, laboratory and warehouse |
|
Operating burn (Years 1–2) |
R9.6m |
Negative EBITDA of R8.0m in Year 1 and R1.6m in Year 2, as projected |
|
Interest |
R3.5m |
Net finance cost of R1.4m and R2.1m as projected |
|
Working capital build |
R8.8m |
45 days of debtors and 30 days of stock on Year-2 revenue of R52.7m |
|
Total requirement |
R58.4m |
|
|
Series A raised |
R48.0m |
R30.0m equity plus R18.0m asset finance |
|
Shortfall |
R10.4m |
Adding the Plan’s own figures for the twenty-four months before Series B gives a requirement of approximately R58.4 million against R48.0 million raised. Even taking the narrower view that working capital is limited to the R6.5 million the use-of-funds table allocates to working capital and contingency, which would require the business to fund a ramp from R13.7 million to R52.7 million of revenue on that amount, the requirement is R56.1 million and the shortfall R8.1 million. Note also that the R6.5 million line is described as working capital *and contingency*, so the true contingency on a R36.5 million construction programme is thinner still. Three resolutions are available: increase Series A, bring Series B forward, or arrange a working capital facility against domestic debtors alongside the round. The Company should state which it intends, because a business that runs out of cash in month twenty-two raises Series B on terms set by necessity rather than by proof, which would defeat the entire purpose of the staged structure.
The elegance of the two-round structure depends on Series B arriving on schedule and on favourable terms, which in turn depends on the Series A milestones being met. Those milestones include FSSC 22000 certification, which the Plan itself acknowledges requires a meaningful period of production records before a certification body will act. If commissioning slips by a quarter, certification slips with it, and the Series B milestone gate moves, while the cash requirement does not. The Company should model the cash position under a six-month Series B delay and state what bridge is available. On the figures above, there is no headroom to absorb one.