Sireletso Protective Group Business Plan — Working Capital: The Central Finding

Why payroll is paid weekly and clients settle in 45 to 60 days, what that gap does to cash, and the discounting facility that bridges it.

Working Capital: The Central Finding

Jump to section
On this page

  • 12.1 The counterfactual
  • 12.2 Collection performance
  • 12.3 Collection discipline
Working capital absorption against cumulative EBITDA
Figure 15. Working capital absorption against cumulative EBITDA.

R million

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Trade debtors

5.79

11.14

13.75

16.10

18.20

Inventory

0.46

0.89

1.10

1.29

1.47

Trade creditors

(0.69)

(1.33)

(1.65)

(1.94)

(2.20)

Net working capital

5.56

10.70

13.20

15.45

17.47

Absorbed in the year

(5.56)

(5.14)

(2.50)

(2.25)

(2.02)

Cumulative absorbed

(5.56)

(10.70)

(13.20)

(15.45)

(17.47)

Cumulative EBITDA

(1.40)

4.82

13.96

25.77

39.88

Across the five-year projection the Company generates R39.88 million of cumulative EBITDA and absorbs R17.47 million into working capital, principally trade debtors. Working capital consumes 44 per cent of everything the business earns before a single rand of interest, tax, capital expenditure or debt repayment is met.

In Years 1 and 2 the position is worse still: cumulative working capital absorption of R10.70 million exceeds cumulative EBITDA of R4.82 million outright. The business is, on a cash basis, running backwards while growing profitably. This is not a flaw in the plan; it is the arithmetic of a labour services business that pays weekly and collects in two months, and it is why the financing structure and not the operating model is the critical design decision in this transaction.

12.1 The counterfactual

Closing cash with and without the debtor finance facility
Figure 16. Closing cash with and without the debtor finance facility.

R million

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Closing cash with the facility

1.31

0.34

1.35

4.41

8.77

Closing cash without the facility

(2.45)

(6.90)

(7.59)

(6.05)

(3.06)

Facility drawn

3.76

7.24

8.94

10.46

11.83

Facility headroom against the R12.00m limit

8.24

4.76

3.06

1.54

0.17

12.2 Collection performance

Facility draw required at Year 5 under different collection performance
Figure 17. Facility draw required at Year 5 under different collection performance.
The debtor book against the facility that funds it
Figure 18. The debtor book against the facility that funds it.

Debtor days

Year 5 trade debtors

Facility draw required

Facility headroom

Position

45 days

R13.21m

R8.59m

R3.41m

Comfortable

55 days

R16.15m

R10.50m

R1.50m

Tight

62 days

R18.20m

R11.83m

R0.17m

Tight

70 days

R20.55m

R13.36m

(R1.36m)

Limit breached

78 days

R22.90m

R14.88m

(R2.88m)

Limit breached

The covenant is set at 75 days. At 70 days the facility is already exhausted, which means the covenant would be passed in the quarter that the business ran out of funding. A lender should set the debtor covenant at 68 days rather than 75, or increase the facility limit to R14.00 million, so that the covenant test and the funding constraint bind at the same point.

12.3 Collection discipline

  • A dedicated credit controller is appointed from Year 2 and is the first administrative hire after the finance manager, ahead of any additional business development capacity.
  • Invoices are raised within two business days of month end with the deployment record attached, because a query on a timesheet is worth a fortnight of collection period.
  • Every client is credit-assessed before the first deployment and re-assessed annually; the facility only advances against eligible debtors.
  • No single client is permitted to exceed a defined share of the debtor book, so that one slow payer is an irritation rather than a funding event.
  • The debtor age analysis is reviewed weekly by the finance director and reported monthly to the lender as part of the covenant pack.