Sireletso Protective Group Business Plan — Break-Even

The contract and officer count needed to cover the cost base, and when the business crosses its own break-even.

Break-Even

Jump to section
Break-even analysis on the Year 3 cost structure
Figure 20. Break-even analysis on the Year 3 cost structure.

Measure

Value

Basis

Gross margin, Year 3

38.1%

After the direct cost of protective personnel

Variable overheads

6.0% of revenue

Scales with deployment

Contribution margin

32.1%

Gross margin less variable overheads

Cash fixed cost

R16.88m

Overhead salaries plus fixed overheads

Break-even revenue, cash costs

R52.59m

Fixed cost divided by contribution margin

Term debt service, Year 3

R3.80m

Interest plus capital

Break-even revenue including debt service

R64.42m

The level at which the Company can stand still

Projected Year 3 revenue

R80.96m

Headroom of 26% above the debt-inclusive break-even

On the Year 3 cost structure the Company requires R52.59 million of annual revenue to cover its cash costs and R64.42 million to cover cash costs plus term debt service. Projected Year 3 revenue of R80.96 million provides headroom of 26 per cent above the debt-inclusive break-even.

That break-even is high in absolute terms — the Company must sustain roughly R64.42 million of annual revenue, equivalent to more than a hundred deployed personnel, simply to stand still. It is the direct consequence of the fixed establishment described in Section 10, and it is the reason a sub-scale version of this business is not viable.

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Revenue

34.08

65.60

80.96

94.76

107.17

Break-even, cash costs

38.42

46.37

52.59

57.74

62.41

Break-even including term debt service

44.61

55.32

64.43

69.70

74.48

Headroom above the debt-inclusive break-even

-24%

19%

26%

36%

44%