Golden Delta Rice Business Plan — Break-Even and Debt Service

The tonnage and utilisation needed to cover the cost base, and debt service cover across the two-year capital moratorium and beyond.

Break-Even and Debt Service

Jump to section
On this page

  • 10.1 Break-even
  • 10.2 Debt service

10.1 Break-even

Break-even in tonnes of milled rice
Figure 16. Break-even in tonnes of milled rice.

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Contribution per tonne of milled rice, ₦

367 794

424 774

480 667

529 495

580 336

Fixed cash costs, ₦

176 000 000

198 880 000

224 734 400

253 949 872

286 963 355

EBITDA break-even volume, t

479

468

468

480

494

Break-even including debt service, t

653

619

799

780

769

Planned milled rice output, t

454

764

1 004

1 100

1 189

Break-even as % of planned output

143.8%

81.0%

79.6%

70.9%

64.7%

Margin of safety, percentage points

-43.8

19.0

20.4

29.1

35.3

At full production the venture breaks even, after covering fixed cash costs and full debt service, at 769 tonnes of milled rice against a planned 1 189 — a margin of safety of 35 percentage points. That is comfortable. The relevant number for a funder, however, is Year 1: at 454 tonnes of output against a break-even of 653 tonnes including debt service, the margin of safety is negative 44 points. The safety margin is earned by Year 2, not granted at the outset.

Break-even measure at full production

Value

Interpretation

Contribution per tonne of milled rice

₦580 336

After all variable costs including purchased paddy

Fixed cash costs

₦286 963 355

Must be covered before any profit

EBITDA break-even volume

494 t

Tonnes of milled rice a year

Break-even including debt service

769 t

The operative measure for a geared business

Planned volume

1 189 t

Break-even as a share of output

64.7%

Capacity utilisation required

Margin of safety

35.3 points

How far output can fall before losses

Break-even yield for raw paddy

3.52 t/ha

Against a national average of 2.0 and a plan of 5.0

10.2 Debt service

EBITDA, debt service and cover across the projection
Figure 17. EBITDA, debt service and cover across the projection.

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Opening balance

713 653 000

713 653 000

713 653 000

618 794 398

515 398 522

Interest at 9.0%

64 228 770

64 228 770

64 228 770

55 691 496

46 385 867

Capital repaid

— (moratorium)

— (moratorium)

94 858 602

103 395 876

112 701 505

Total debt service

64 228 770

64 228 770

159 087 372

159 087 372

159 087 372

Closing balance

713 653 000

713 653 000

618 794 398

515 398 522

402 697 017

EBITDA

(9 021 600)

125 647 606

257 855 758

328 495 078

403 055 953

Debt service cover

-0.14x

1.96x

1.62x

2.06x

2.53x

Cover is negative 0.14 times in Year 1 by construction — EBITDA is negative and the business is paying interest out of the working capital reserve. It reaches 1.96 times in Year 2, when interest is still the only service obligation, then falls to 1.62 times in Year 3 as the first capital repayment of ₦94 858 602 falls due, before rising to 2.53 times by Year 5. A lender should note that the Year 2 figure flatters the position: it is high because no capital is being repaid, not because the business is strong.

Covenant consideration

Position

What a lender should require

Year 1 cover

−0.14x

Covenant testing must commence no earlier than Year 2, and preferably Year 3

Year 2 cover

1.96x

Flattered by the moratorium; interest-only service is not a fair test

Year 3 cover

1.62x

The first genuine test, and the year the covenant should bite

Moratorium

Two years on capital

Negotiated at the outset, not requested when Year 1 disappoints

Yield covenant

5.0 t/ha by Year 3

Test yield and recovery from the first season, not just financial ratios

Security

Registered title, mill and equipment

Land tenure is what makes the debt securable at all

Previous section9. Financial Plan