Helios Nexus Energy — Appendices

Supporting appendices - the full 10-year three-statement model, the assumptions register, the downside scenario, the key financial ratios, the sources and the glossary and abbreviations underpinning the Helios Nexus business plan and financial model.

Helios Nexus Energy Business PlanSection 14 › Appendices

Section 14 · Business Plan

Appendices

Supporting appendices – the full 10-year three-statement model, the assumptions register, the downside scenario, the key financial ratios, the sources and the glossary and abbreviations underpinning the Helios Nexus business plan and financial model.

Appendix A — Full 10-Year Three-Statement Model

Income statement (R m)

R m Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10
Revenue 0 650 2,100 4,500 7,900 11,800 16,500 21,200 25,600 30,800
EBITDA 0 180 820 1,950 3,600 5,400 7,700 9,800 11,600 13,400
Depreciation (29) (93) (199) (349) (521) (729) (936) (1130) (1360)
Interest (247) (572) (873) (1120) (1235) (1143) (1051) (880) (710)
PBT 0 (96) 156 878 2,131 3,644 5,828 7,813 9,589 11,331
Tax (16) (237) (575) (984) (1574) (2110) (2589) (3059)
NPAT (re-derived) 0 (96) 140 641 1,556 2,660 4,255 5,703 7,000 8,271

Cash flow (R m)

R m Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10
Operating cash flow 0 122 673 1,497 2,719 4,065 5,703 7,268 8,615 9,873
Capex (2400) (3600) (4200) (3900) (3800) (3500) (2800) (2200) (1600) (800)
Debt draws 2,200 2,900 2,700 2,200 1,000
Equity injections 2,900 3,600 3,400 2,600 2,100 1,400 900 500 300 100
Dividends (3829) (5133) (6300) (7444)
Closing cash 500 2,575 4,776 6,800 8,899 9,829 7,860 5,693 4,278 3,747

Balance sheet (R m)

R m Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10
PPE (net) 0 545 1,733 3,654 6,308 9,231 12,653 15,868 18,623 21,855
CWIP 2,400 5,426 8,346 10,126 10,923 10,979 9,629 7,678 5,392 1,600
Cash 500 2,575 4,776 6,800 8,899 9,829 7,860 5,693 4,278 3,747
Total assets 2,900 8,604 15,044 20,985 26,841 31,101 31,627 31,147 30,597 29,974
Equity 2,900 6,404 9,944 13,185 16,841 20,901 22,227 23,297 24,297 25,224
Debt 0 2,200 5,100 7,800 10,000 10,200 9,400 7,850 6,300 4,750
Check 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Appendix B — Assumptions Register

Assumptions marked ◆ are sponsor anchors preserved exactly; all
others are analyst-derived.

# Assumption Value Basis
1 Revenue path ◆ R0 → R30,800m (Y1–Y10) Sponsor
2 EBITDA ◆ R180m → R13,400m Sponsor
3 Capital programme ◆ R28,800m across 7 categories Sponsor (headline R24.8bn flagged §8)
4 Funding stack ◆ R17,800m equity + R11,000m debt Sponsor
5 Project schedule ◆ 6 GW gen + 1.5 GW storage; 5 projects Sponsor
6 Depreciation ~20-yr blended (solar/wind 25, BESS 12) Analyst (asset-class lives)
7 Senior debt rate 11.5% ZAR Analyst; SA infra debt
8 Green bond rate 10.5% ZAR Analyst; ESG pricing benefit
9 Corporate tax 27% + s20 loss carry-forward Income Tax Act
10 Working capital 9% of revenue Trading receivables ~33 days
11 RCF R1,600m facility, 12% Analyst; ramp liquidity
12 Dividend policy Cash-sweep above R2,500m from Y7 Analyst
13 Exit multiple (base) 9x EV/EBITDA Analyst; trading-mix & SA discount
14 Exit multiple (sponsor) 11x EV/EBITDA Sponsor
15 Contracted revenue target 80% Sponsor

Appendix C — Downside Scenario

The downside combines a grid-driven generation delay with a
restrictive trading-regulation outcome — the two binding constraints.
Revenue is reduced 25% against base throughout, compressing EBITDA
through operating leverage.

R m Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y10
Revenue (−25%) 3,375 5,925 8,850 12,375 15,900 23,100
EBITDA 1,658 3,060 4,590 6,545 8,330 11,390
Debt service (873) (1,120) (2,035) (1,943) (2,601) (2,260)
DSCR (x) 1.90 2.73 2.26 3.37 3.20 5.04
Downside reading

In the downside, DSCR compresses but the contracted generation core
continues to service debt through most of the horizon, because owned
generation (70% of revenue) is contracted and resilient even when the
trading division is constrained. This is the structural benefit of
anchoring the platform in generation rather than trading: the stress
case is uncomfortable but survivable, and equity value is deferred
rather than destroyed. It is the case against which lenders should size
the debt-service reserve, contracted-revenue covenants and the equity
cushion.

Appendix D — Key Financial Ratios

The table summarises the principal credit and return ratios derived
from the three-statement model, for lender and investor reference. All
figures follow from the independently re-derived statements in Appendix
A.

Metric Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10
EBITDA margin (%) 39 43 46 46 47 46 45 44
Net margin (%) 7 14 20 23 26 27 27 27
DSCR (x) 1.18 1.71 2.43 2.00 2.94 2.79 3.54 4.37
Interest cover (x) 1.4 2.2 3.2 4.4 6.7 9.3 13.2 18.9
Debt / EBITDA (x) 6.2 4.0 2.8 1.9 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.4
Debt / (Debt+Equity) % 34 37 37 33 30 25 21 16
Return on equity (%) 1 5 9 13 19 24 29 33
Capex / revenue (%) 200 87 48 30 17 10 6 3

The ratios trace the platform’s maturation: margins and cover
strengthen as generation stabilises, gearing (debt/EBITDA and
debt/capital) falls steadily as the assets de-lever, and return on
equity climbs into the operating phase. The Year-2–3 ramp is the weak
point across every credit metric — the window the debt-service reserve,
contracted-revenue floor and distribution lock-up are designed to
protect — after which the credit profile is strong and improving. This
ratio set is the quantitative summary a credit committee would anchor
on.

Appendix E — Sources

  • NERSA — July 2025 notice of intent to develop electricity Trading
    Rules under s35 ERA (gazetting anticipated mid-2026); trading-licence
    framework
  • Eskom — Virtual Wheeling Platform launch (June 2025); Vodacom
    pilot (15,000+ sites, 168 municipalities); initial exclusion of
    third-party traders pending Trading Rules
  • Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, Pinsent Masons, Green Building Africa —
    trader landscape (Envusa/Anglo-EDF, NOA, EXSA/Remgro, Etana, Enpower,
    PowerX, Africa GreenCo); wheeling and VWP mechanics
  • SALGA (2023) — status of municipal wheeling frameworks (few
    operational systems); ERA 2021–2023 reforms (licensing threshold
    removal, multi-offtaker wheeling)
  • Africa.com / market data — installed renewable capacity 18.18 GW
    (2025); short-term PPA trend; corporate-PPA growth
  • DMRE/DEE, NTCSA, GreenCape, CSIR — grid-capacity constraints;
    Independent Transmission Projects programme; IRP renewable/storage
    build-out
  • Sponsor brief — Helios Nexus revenue/EBITDA/NPAT, R28.8bn capital
    & funding stack, project schedule, exit assumptions (independently
    re-derived below EBITDA herein)

Appendix F — Glossary & Abbreviations

Term Definition
Ancillary services Grid-balancing services (frequency, reserves) sold to the system operator
BESS Battery Energy Storage System
Capacity factor Actual output as a percentage of maximum possible output
COD Commercial Operation Date
Corporate PPA Power Purchase Agreement between a generator and a private offtaker
Curtailment Grid-instructed reduction of generation output
DFI Development Finance Institution
DSCR Debt-Service Cover Ratio
ERA Electricity Regulation Act (as amended, 2024)
Green bond Debt instrument ring-fenced to certified environmental assets
IPP Independent Power Producer
IRP Integrated Resource Plan
ITP Independent Transmission Projects programme
NERSA National Energy Regulator of South Africa
NTCSA National Transmission Company of South Africa
PPA Power Purchase Agreement
REC Renewable Energy Certificate
REIPPPP Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme
SAPP Southern African Power Pool
Trading (electricity) Buying and reselling power under a NERSA trading licence
VWP Virtual Wheeling Platform (Eskom)
Wheeling Transporting power across the grid from generator to offtaker

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of Helios Nexus Energy Holdings (Pty) Ltd.