RenaCare Dialysis Clinic — Financial Plan

The financial model overview and assumptions, the revenue model and operating cost structure, projected income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, break-even, sensitivity and the funding structure and returns.

RenaCare Dialysis Clinic Business PlanSection 9 › Financial Plan

Section 9 · Business Plan

Financial Plan

The financial model overview and assumptions, the revenue model and operating cost structure, projected income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, break-even, sensitivity and the funding structure and returns.

9.1 Financial Model Overview

The financial projections presented in this section cover a five-year
forecast horizon from Year 1 (first full year of operations) through
Year 5. All amounts are denominated in South African Rand (ZAR) at
nominal prices. The model was constructed bottom-up from operational
drivers (patient numbers, sessions, tariffs) rather than top-down from
revenue or margin targets. The base case presented here is the central
scenario; bear and bull scenarios are presented in Section 9.10.

9.2 Key Financial Assumptions

Assumption Value Basis / Rationale
Dialysis stations 20 Single flagship clinic footprint
Shifts per day 3 Standard industry 3-shift operating model
Operating days per year 312 6 days/week × 52 weeks (Sundays closed)
Theoretical maximum sessions/year 18,720 20 × 3 × 312
Year 1 station utilisation 50% Phased ramp during accreditation and referral build-out
Year 3 station utilisation 85% Steady-state benchmark; consistent with incumbent norms
Average tariff, Year 1 (blended) R 2,650 / session Weighted average across DSP, open scheme and private pay
Annual tariff escalation 6.5% Conservative vs 10.3%+ medical aid inflation observed in 2024–25
Consumables cost / session, Year 1 R 820 Dialyser, bloodlines, concentrate, saline, heparin
EPO & biologics / session, Year 1 R 120 Blended across patient population
Year 1 staff costs R 7.35 M Phased hiring during ramp
Annual staff cost escalation 7.0% Above CPI to reflect scarcity of dialysis nurses
Rent & utilities, Year 1 R 2.78 M R 185 / m² × 850 m² + utilities
SA corporate tax rate 27% Current SARS rate for companies
Senior debt interest rate 12.75% Prime + 2.5% (DFI / commercial term)
Equipment lease rate 13.5% Typical equipment finance margin
Weighted Average Cost of Capital 16.5% Blended cost across debt, equity and leases

9.3 Revenue Model

Revenue is modelled as the product of sessions delivered and blended
tariff per session. Sessions delivered are driven by station utilisation
ramping from 50% in Year 1 to 92% in Year 5. Blended tariff reflects the
weighted mix of DSP, open-scheme, PPP and private-pay patients, and
escalates at 6.5% annually. Ancillary revenue (nephrology consultations,
PD training) adds approximately 4.5% to core haemodialysis revenue.

Revenue Driver Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Station utilisation 50% 72% 85% 90% 92%
Annual sessions delivered 9,360 13,478 15,912 16,848 17,222
Average tariff (ZAR) 2,650 2,822 3,006 3,201 3,410
Haemodialysis revenue (ZAR) 24,800,000 35,300,000 44,900,000 50,400,000 55,500,000
Ancillary revenue (ZAR) included 1,600,000 1,900,000 2,200,000 2,400,000
Total revenue (ZAR) 24,800,000 36,900,000 46,800,000 52,600,000 57,900,000

9.4 Operating Cost Structure

Figure 9.1
Figure 9.1 — Operating cost structure (Year 3 steady state)

Operating costs are grouped into consumables (variable with volume),
staff (semi-fixed), facility and utilities (fixed), and overheads
(semi-variable). The following table presents the detailed operating
expense schedule:

Operating Cost (ZAR ’000s) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Consumables & dialysate 8,900 13,100 15,900 16,800 17,400
Clinical & admin staff 7,350 7,866 8,417 9,006 9,636
Rent 1,450 1,552 1,660 1,776 1,900
Utilities (power, water, gas) 950 1,025 1,107 1,196 1,292
Insurance 380 410 443 478 516
Maintenance & servicing 600 650 700 760 820
Medical waste & infection control 450 640 780 825 855
Marketing 520 480 420 380 350
Administration & overheads 780 840 907 980 1,058
IT & EMR 260 275 292 310 329
Professional fees (audit, legal) 180 195 210 230 250
Total operating costs 19,820 26,934 30,836 32,741 34,406

9.5 Projected Profit & Loss Statement

The five-year projected Profit and Loss Statement is presented below
in summary form. A full year-by-year schedule showing revenue, direct
costs, gross profit, operating expenses, EBITDA, depreciation, EBIT,
interest, profit before tax, tax and profit after tax follows.

ZAR ’000s Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Revenue 24,800 36,900 46,800 52,600 57,900
Less: Consumables & dialysate (8,900) (13,100) (15,900) (16,800) (17,400)
Gross profit 15,900 23,800 30,900 35,800 40,500
Gross margin 64.1% 64.5% 66.0% 68.1% 69.9%
Less: Staff costs (7,350) (7,866) (8,417) (9,006) (9,636)
Less: Facility & utilities (2,780) (2,987) (3,210) (3,450) (3,708)
Less: Other operating costs (790) (991) (1,233) (1,345) (1,422)
Less: Marketing & admin (1,520) (1,590) (1,687) (1,790) (1,908)
Less: Insurance & maintenance (980) (1,060) (1,143) (1,238) (1,336)
EBITDA 2,480 9,306 15,210 18,971 22,490
EBITDA margin 10.0% 25.2% 32.5% 36.1% 38.8%
Less: Depreciation & amortisation (1,670) (1,670) (1,670) (1,670) (1,670)
EBIT (Operating profit) 810 7,636 13,540 17,301 20,820
Less: Interest expense (1,553) (1,318) (1,046) (734) (376)
Profit before tax (743) 6,318 12,494 16,567 20,444
Less: Tax (27%) 0 (1,706) (3,373) (4,473) (5,520)
Profit / (loss) after tax (743) 4,612 9,121 12,094 14,924

Year 1 reports a small accounting loss of R0.74M reflecting
first-year commissioning costs, phased utilisation and full-year
depreciation and interest charges. Tax losses carried forward shield
approximately R740k of taxable profits in Year 2. From Year 2 onward,
the business generates consistent profits with EBITDA margins expanding
from 25.2% to 38.8% as utilisation matures and the fixed-cost base
dilutes over higher volume.

Figure 9.2
Figure 9.2 — EBITDA and net profit margin progression

9.6 Projected Balance Sheet

The projected balance sheet demonstrates progressive strengthening of
the capital structure through retained earnings, debt amortisation and
disciplined working capital management. Shareholders’ equity grows from
the R8 million opening contribution to approximately R45.7 million by
the end of Year 5, reflecting cumulative retained earnings net of
accounting loss in Year 1.

ZAR ’000s Y0 (Open) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
ASSETS
Property, plant & equipment (net) 15,500 13,830 12,160 10,490 8,820
Intangible assets (EMR, licences) 500 375 250 125 0
Total non-current assets 16,000 14,205 12,410 10,615 8,820
Trade & other receivables 0 4,100 5,800 7,100 7,950
Inventory (consumables) 0 1,480 1,950 2,150 2,250
Cash & cash equivalents 4,000 2,890 6,520 12,620 21,320
Total current assets 4,000 8,470 14,270 21,870 31,520
TOTAL ASSETS 20,000 22,675 26,680 32,485 40,340
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Share capital 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
Retained earnings 0 (743) 3,869 12,990 25,084
Total shareholders’ equity 8,000 7,257 11,869 20,990 33,084
Senior term loan (non-current) 7,725 6,288 4,660 2,813 715
Equipment finance lease 2,470 1,867 1,182 405 0
Deferred tax 0 50 280 520 790
Total non-current liabilities 10,195 8,205 6,122 3,738 1,505
Trade payables 0 2,980 3,690 4,020 4,190
Current portion of long-term debt 1,805 2,041 2,312 2,625 880
Other current liabilities 0 2,192 2,687 1,112 681
Total current liabilities 1,805 7,213 8,689 7,757 5,751
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 20,000 22,675 26,680 32,485 40,340
Key ratio Year 5 Interpretation
Debt-to-equity ratio 0.05x Nearly debt-free by end of Year 5
Current ratio 5.2x Strong short-term liquidity
Return on equity 32.5% Attractive shareholder returns
Return on assets 18.4% Efficient asset utilisation
Figure 9.3
Figure 9.3 — Balance sheet progression: total assets, liabilities and equity

9.7 Projected Cash Flow Statement

The cash flow statement reconciles accounting profit to actual cash
generation. The business becomes free-cash-flow positive from Year 3
onwards and repays initial investors progressively from Year 4.
Cumulative free cash flow crosses zero approximately 34 months into
commercial operations.

ZAR ’000s Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Profit / (loss) after tax (743) 4,612 9,121 12,094 14,924
Add back: Depreciation & amortisation 1,670 1,670 1,670 1,670 1,670
Add back: Interest expense 1,553 1,318 1,046 734 376
Change in working capital (2,600) (1,870) (960) (480) (250)
Cash from operations (120) 5,730 10,877 14,018 16,720
Less: Interest paid (1,553) (1,318) (1,046) (734) (376)
Less: Tax paid 0 (400) (2,980) (4,200) (5,240)
Net cash from operating activities (1,673) 4,012 6,851 9,084 11,104
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Initial CAPEX (Year 0) (16,000)
Replacement CAPEX (180) (250) (350) (480) (620)
Net cash from investing activities (180) (250) (350) (480) (620)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Loan drawdown (Year 0) 0 0 0 0 0
Loan principal repayments (1,275) (1,437) (1,627) (1,847) (2,097)
Equipment lease principal (530) (603) (685) (777) (880)
Equity dividends 0 0 0 (500) (1,500)
Net cash from financing activities (1,805) (2,040) (2,312) (3,124) (4,477)
Net change in cash (3,658) 1,722 4,189 5,480 6,007
Opening cash 4,000 342 2,064 6,253 11,733
Closing cash 342 2,064 6,253 11,733 17,740

Year 1 closing cash of R0.34M is tight by design — maximising the use
of equity capital to fund growth rather than idle balance sheet
liquidity. A committed R3 million working-capital facility with the
Company’s commercial banker (drawn but not utilised in the base case)
provides additional headroom. This facility is available at marginal
cost unless drawn, and serves as a cushion against receivables timing
risk.

Figure 9.4
Figure 9.4 — Cumulative free cash flow and payback profile

9.8 Capital Expenditure Detail

Figure 9.5
Figure 9.5 — Capital expenditure allocation
CAPEX Item Amount (ZAR) Timing Useful life
Leasehold improvements (850 m² fit-out) 5,000,000 M6 – M10 10 years (lease term)
Dialysis machines (20 units) 8,000,000 M7 – M9 8 years
Water treatment RO plant (dual-pass) 2,000,000 M8 – M10 10 years
Furniture, chairs, clinical fittings 1,500,000 M9 – M11 7 years
IT systems & EMR licence 500,000 M8 – M10 4 years
Working capital reserve 3,000,000 M10 – M12 n/a
Total initial capital requirement 20,000,000

9.9 Funding Structure

Figure 9.6
Figure 9.6 — Funding structure at financial close

The proposed R20 million funding package is constructed to balance
cost of capital, covenant flexibility, and alignment of stakeholder
incentives. The senior term loan is targeted at development finance
institutions (such as the Industrial Development Corporation and the
Public Investment Corporation’s healthcare fund) or commercial banks
with demonstrated healthcare sector appetite (such as Nedbank Business
Banking or Investec). Equipment finance is vendor-sourced under a master
lease facility with indicative terms already negotiated with Fresenius
Medical Care’s South African operation. The equity tranche is sized to
maintain debt-service-coverage ratios above 1.8x in the base case,
providing sufficient cushion against the downside scenarios
modelled.

Debt service coverage

Covenant / Metric Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
EBITDA 2,480 9,306 15,210 18,971 22,490
Debt service 3,358 3,358 3,358 3,358 3,358
Debt service coverage ratio 0.74x 2.77x 4.53x 5.65x 6.70x
Covenant floor 1.20x 1.20x 1.20x 1.20x 1.20x
Headroom vs covenant (0.46)x 1.57x 3.33x 4.45x 5.50x

Year 1 DSCR is below the typical 1.2x covenant floor — an expected
feature of a greenfield project’s first year of operations. This is
addressed through a 12-month interest-only holiday negotiated as a
condition of drawdown, with principal repayments commencing month 13.
From Year 2 onwards, the business generates significant headroom against
debt-service covenants.

9.10 Scenario Analysis

Three scenarios have been modelled to stress-test the project’s
financial resilience: a Bear case reflecting slower utilisation ramp,
higher consumables inflation and a 10% lower blended tariff; a Base case
(the primary projections presented above); and a Bull case reflecting
faster utilisation, successful inclusion in a PPP programme, and opening
of a second clinic in Year 4.

Figure 9.7
Figure 9.7 — Revenue scenarios: bear, base and bull cases
Metric (Year 5) Bear Base Bull
Revenue (ZAR) 43.0 M 57.9 M 70.2 M
EBITDA margin 24% 35% 42%
Project IRR 12.8% 22.4% 31.2%
Payback (months) 52 34 26
Net present value at 16.5% WACC (R 1.6 M) R 14.8 M R 36.4 M

9.11 Sensitivity Analysis

Figure 9.8
Figure 9.8 — IRR sensitivity tornado analysis (base IRR 22.4%)

The tornado chart ranks the principal drivers of project IRR by
magnitude of impact. The two most sensitive levers are station
utilisation (a 10 percentage-point change in utilisation moves IRR by
±9.2 pp) and dialysis tariff (a 10% change in tariff moves IRR by ±7.5
pp). Management’s operational focus will correspondingly concentrate on
the drivers of these two variables: medical-aid DSP accreditation (which
drives tariff), and referrer engagement (which drives utilisation).

9.12 Investment Returns

Returns summary Project IRR 22.4% | Equity IRR 28.7% | NPV at 16.5% WACC R14.8M | Payback month 34 | 5-year revenue CAGR 23.6% | 5-year EBITDA CAGR 72.4%.

At a five-year exit based on 6.0x trailing EBITDA (a conservative
multiple relative to recent transactions in the SA healthcare sector),
enterprise value would be approximately R135 million. Net of residual
debt of R0.7 million, equity value would be approximately R134 million —
representing a cash-on-cash multiple of 16.8x on the R8 million equity
investment, equivalent to an equity IRR of 74.9% at five-year exit.
These figures assume no Phase 2 clinic opens; the opening of a second
clinic in Year 4 (base-case operational scenario) materially accelerates
enterprise value growth.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of RenaCare Dialysis Clinic (Pty) Ltd.