Essence Premium Catering Business Plan — Implementation Timeline
The timeline from funding close to full production, covering kitchen fit-out, certification, recruitment and contract mobilisation.
Implementation Timeline
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Why Ekurhuleni
- 3. The Market and the Segment Trap
- 4. Contribution by Segment
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. Winning and Keeping Contracts
- 7. Tendering Into the Public Sector
- 8. Unit Economics and Prime Cost
- 9. Working Capital
- 10. The Five-Year Build and Its Gates
- 11. Funding
- 12. People and Production
- 13. Food Safety and Compliance
- 14. Financial Projections
- 15. Break-Even
- 16. Sensitivity and Scenarios
- 17. Risk Management
- 18. Implementation Timeline
- 19. Returns
- 20. Key Performance Indicators
- 21. Key Assumptions
- 22. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
|
Period |
Milestone |
|---|---|
|
Months 1–4 |
Founder equity committed; CIPC, SARS, Central Supplier Database and B-BBEE affidavit lodged |
|
Months 3–5 |
Premises leased with the landlord installation allowance negotiated into the lease before signature |
|
Months 4–8 |
Kitchen fit-out: floors, drainage, extraction, three-phase power; fire and municipal compliance |
|
Months 6–9 |
Combi ovens, cold rooms, blast chiller, hot boxes and solar installed and commissioned |
|
Month 9 |
Certificate of Acceptability issued by the local authority where the kitchen sits |
|
Months 9–13 |
Costed menus built to the gram; food cost targets set by segment; temperature records begun |
|
Month 10 |
First industrial contract signed, with an annual escalation clause |
|
End Year 1 |
Gate 1: CoA held, food cost within 2 points of target for three months, first contract renewed |
|
Year 2 |
Second vehicle; institutional contract won; events programme launched; production manager trained |
|
End Year 2 |
Gate 2: EBITDA loss narrowing, working capital facility in place, production manager running the kitchen |
|
Year 3 |
Growth equity of R2.10m drawn; kitchen capacity doubled; public sector tendering begins; HACCP implemented |
|
End Year 3 |
Gate 3: government capped at one third of meals, EBITDA positive, HACCP-based system audited |
|
Year 4 |
No new segment. Retention deepened, event volume grown, escalation clauses brought onto every contract |
|
End Year 4 |
Gate 4: no single client above 25% of revenue, all contracts carrying escalation |
|
Year 5 |
Fifth vehicle; expanded cold chain; management layer complete; cover 1.33x at 3 464 meals a day |
18.1 Critical dependencies
|
Dependency |
What it gates |
Management |
|---|---|---|
|
Certificate of Acceptability |
The first meal and every public tender |
Applied for during fit-out; issued by the authority where the kitchen sits, not where the company is registered |
|
Landlord installation allowance |
R165 000 of the fit-out cost |
Negotiated into the lease before signature; it cannot be obtained afterward |
|
Fit-out before equipment |
Commissioning and the first service |
Drainage, extraction and three-phase power must precede oven installation |
|
First contract before the kitchen is idle |
Cash flow from month ten |
Sold during fit-out, not after; a commissioned kitchen with no contract burns cash daily |
|
Costed menus before the first bid |
Every price quoted thereafter |
Built during fit-out; a bid priced without a costed menu is a guess |
|
Production manager trained |
The Year 2 gate and every growth item above it |
Recruited Year 1, trained through Year 2; frees the founder for commercial work |
|
Working capital facility |
The Year 3 government work |
Arranged in Year 2, before the 68-day debtor book exists |
|
Temperature records from day one |
HACCP audit at the Year 3 gate |
An audit examines history; history cannot be reconstructed |
|
Escalation clauses on every contract |
The Year 4 gate |
Negotiated at signature or renewal, when the caterer has leverage |