Essence Premium Catering Business Plan — Funding
R2.15m founder equity, R2.10m growth equity at the capacity step and R8.89m of loans and contract-backed facilities.
Funding
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Why Ekurhuleni
- 3. The Market and the Segment Trap
- 4. Contribution by Segment
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. Winning and Keeping Contracts
- 7. Tendering Into the Public Sector
- 8. Unit Economics and Prime Cost
- 9. Working Capital
- 10. The Five-Year Build and Its Gates
- 11. Funding
- 12. People and Production
- 13. Food Safety and Compliance
- 14. Financial Projections
- 15. Break-Even
- 16. Sensitivity and Scenarios
- 17. Risk Management
- 18. Implementation Timeline
- 19. Returns
- 20. Key Performance Indicators
- 21. Key Assumptions
- 22. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
- 11.1 Use of funds
- 11.2 Year 1 capital
- 11.3 Year 2 capital
- 11.4 Year 3 capital
- 11.5 Year 4 capital
- 11.6 Year 5 capital
- 11.7 Debt and cover
|
Source |
Amount |
What to know |
|---|---|---|
|
Founder equity |
R2.15m |
A production kitchen is capital-intensive before a single meal is sold |
|
SEDFA small enterprise loan |
R1.15m |
Requires CIPC registration, SARS tax compliance and a proposal in their format |
|
Equipment finance |
R3.94m across four tranches |
Asset-backed on combi ovens, cold rooms and vehicles. Accessible early because the security is tangible |
|
Contract-backed working capital facility |
R3.80m cumulative across three tranches |
Advanced against signed contracts and certified invoices. This is the instrument that funds the debtor book, and it revolves rather than amortising |
|
Growth equity, Year 3 |
R2.10m |
Funds the kitchen capacity step rather than adding debt to a thin-margin business |
|
Landlord installation allowance |
R165’000 |
Negotiated as a stated figure in the lease; presented once, as a reduction in the cost of the fit-out |
|
Source |
R’000 |
Share |
Character |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Founder equity |
2 150 |
16.4% |
At inception |
|
Growth equity |
2 100 |
16.0% |
Year 3, at the capacity step |
|
Loans and facilities |
8 890 |
67.7% |
Eight instruments across the build |
|
Total funding raised |
13 140 |
100.0% |
Against R7 940k of capital deployed |
Total funding of R13.14 million exceeds capital deployed of R7.94 million by R5.20 million. That difference is not a surplus: it funds the operating deficit across Years 1 to 3, absorbs R2.41 million of working capital growth, and services the interest on the debt that funds both.
11.1 Use of funds
11.2 Year 1 capital
|
Item |
R’000 |
Treatment |
Share of year |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Production kitchen fit-out, floors, drainage and extraction |
585 |
Capitalised |
18.8% |
|
Combi ovens, bratt pans, boiling pans and ranges |
640 |
Capitalised |
20.5% |
|
Cold room, freezer room and blast chiller |
420 |
Capitalised |
13.5% |
|
Preparation, stainless steel and wash-up |
265 |
Capitalised |
8.5% |
|
Hot boxes, bain-maries, insulated transport containers |
185 |
Capitalised |
5.9% |
|
Delivery vehicle, refrigerated |
465 |
Capitalised |
14.9% |
|
Solar and inverter backup |
165 |
Capitalised |
5.3% |
|
Certificate of Acceptability, fire and municipal compliance |
96 |
Capitalised |
3.1% |
|
Licences, professional fees and deposits |
84 |
Capitalised |
2.7% |
|
Opening stock and pre-contract working capital |
210 |
Working capital |
6.7% |
|
Total Year 1 |
3 115 |
100.0% |
|
|
Less landlord installation allowance |
(165) |
Reduction in cost |
|
|
Net cash requirement, Year 1 |
2 950 |
11.3 Year 2 capital
|
Item |
R’000 |
Treatment |
Share of year |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Second delivery vehicle |
380 |
Capitalised |
55.1% |
|
Additional hot boxes and equipment |
145 |
Capitalised |
21.0% |
|
Cold chain expansion |
165 |
Capitalised |
23.9% |
|
Total Year 2 |
690 |
100.0% |
11.4 Year 3 capital
|
Item |
R’000 |
Treatment |
Share of year |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kitchen capacity expansion and second line |
620 |
Capitalised |
43.8% |
|
Third vehicle |
420 |
Capitalised |
29.7% |
|
Serving counters and site equipment |
265 |
Capitalised |
18.7% |
|
Systems and menu costing software |
110 |
Capitalised |
7.8% |
|
Total Year 3 |
1 415 |
100.0% |
11.5 Year 4 capital
|
Item |
R’000 |
Treatment |
Share of year |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bulk production upgrade |
480 |
Capitalised |
38.7% |
|
Fourth vehicle |
440 |
Capitalised |
35.5% |
|
Site equipment for new contracts |
320 |
Capitalised |
25.8% |
|
Total Year 4 |
1 240 |
100.0% |
11.6 Year 5 capital
|
Item |
R’000 |
Treatment |
Share of year |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kitchen and cold chain expansion |
560 |
Capitalised |
37.8% |
|
Fifth vehicle |
460 |
Capitalised |
31.1% |
|
Site equipment |
340 |
Capitalised |
23.0% |
|
Systems |
120 |
Capitalised |
8.1% |
|
Total Year 5 |
1 480 |
100.0% |
11.7 Debt and cover
|
R’000 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Loans and facilities drawn |
1 930 |
2 070 |
1 480 |
2 090 |
1 320 |
|
Interest |
112 |
357 |
545 |
717 |
874 |
|
Capital repaid |
— |
348 |
486 |
486 |
716 |
|
Total debt service |
112 |
705 |
1 031 |
1 203 |
1 590 |
|
Loans outstanding |
1 930 |
3 652 |
4 647 |
6 251 |
6 855 |
|
Shareholders’ funds |
1 219 |
300 |
1 506 |
1 046 |
1 409 |
|
Gearing, debt to debt plus equity |
61.3% |
92.4% |
75.5% |
85.7% |
83.0% |
|
EBITDA |
(476) |
(143) |
225 |
968 |
2 110 |
|
Debt service cover |
n/m |
n/m |
0.22x |
0.80x |
1.33x |
Cover is not meaningful in Years 1 and 2 because EBITDA is negative. It is 0.22 times in Year 3, 0.80 in Year 4 and 1.33 in Year 5, clearing the 1.30 times gate in the final year with very little to spare. Debt service is met from further drawings and from the growth equity subscription until Year 5. Gearing peaks at 92.4 per cent in Year 2 — the point at which accumulated losses have reduced shareholders’ funds to R300 000 against R3.65 million of debt — and falls to 83.0 per cent by Year 5. A lender should note that Year 2 is the structurally weakest point in the plan and that the growth equity in Year 3 is what repairs it.