Essence Premium Catering Business Plan — Winning and Keeping Contracts
How feeding contracts are won, priced and renewed, and the service disciplines that keep a site once it is on the books.
Winning and Keeping Contracts
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Why Ekurhuleni
- 3. The Market and the Segment Trap
- 4. Contribution by Segment
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. Winning and Keeping Contracts
- 7. Tendering Into the Public Sector
- 8. Unit Economics and Prime Cost
- 9. Working Capital
- 10. The Five-Year Build and Its Gates
- 11. Funding
- 12. People and Production
- 13. Food Safety and Compliance
- 14. Financial Projections
- 15. Break-Even
- 16. Sensitivity and Scenarios
- 17. Risk Management
- 18. Implementation Timeline
- 19. Returns
- 20. Key Performance Indicators
- 21. Key Assumptions
- 22. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
- 6.1 Winning
- 6.2 Keeping
6.1 Winning
- Target sites of 200 to 600 meals a day. Below 200 the distribution cost per meal is punitive. Above 600 a national group will contest it hard and will usually win on price.
- Price off a costed menu, not off a competitor’s rate. Every dish costed to the gram, with a target food cost by segment. A contract won on a price that has not been costed is a loss with a long tail.
- Understand the service level agreement before signing. Penalty clauses, service hours, dietary requirements and audit rights all have a cost. National groups compete on the ability to manage complex service level agreements precisely because those obligations are expensive.
- Ask for an annual price review clause tied to food inflation. Without it the caterer absorbs every input increase for the contract term — and food inflation has run as high as 14.0 per cent within recent memory.
6.2 Keeping
Contract retention is worth more than new business. A caterer that holds a site for five years earns from it without repeating the bid cost, the mobilisation cost or the settling-in period during which margins are always worst.
- Consistency beats creativity. A staff canteen customer wants the same good meal at the same time every day. Novelty is an events proposition, not a contract one.
- Manage the client, not just the kitchen. A monthly review with the site HR or facilities manager, with feedback data, prevents the surprise non-renewal.
- Never fail a food safety audit. One serious incident ends the contract and contaminates every reference.
|
Cost of a lost contract |
Detail |
Order of magnitude |
|---|---|---|
|
Revenue foregone |
A 15% volume contract at Year 5 scale |
R4.77m of revenue |
|
Contribution foregone |
At the industrial contribution rate |
Roughly R1.43m of EBITDA |
|
Bid cost to replace |
Days of bid assembly, costing and site visits |
Part of the R268 000 bid function |
|
Mobilisation cost |
Site equipment, staffing, menu establishment |
Part of the R320 000 site equipment line |
|
Settling-in margin |
The period during which food cost runs above target |
Two to three months of below-target margin |
|
Cover impact |
Debt service cover from 1.33x |
Falls to 0.41x on the scenario in Section 16 |