Essence Premium Catering Business Plan — Winning and Keeping Contracts

How feeding contracts are won, priced and renewed, and the service disciplines that keep a site once it is on the books.

Winning and Keeping Contracts

Jump to section
On this page

  • 6.1 Winning
  • 6.2 Keeping

6.1 Winning

  • Target sites of 200 to 600 meals a day. Below 200 the distribution cost per meal is punitive. Above 600 a national group will contest it hard and will usually win on price.
  • Price off a costed menu, not off a competitor’s rate. Every dish costed to the gram, with a target food cost by segment. A contract won on a price that has not been costed is a loss with a long tail.
  • Understand the service level agreement before signing. Penalty clauses, service hours, dietary requirements and audit rights all have a cost. National groups compete on the ability to manage complex service level agreements precisely because those obligations are expensive.
  • Ask for an annual price review clause tied to food inflation. Without it the caterer absorbs every input increase for the contract term — and food inflation has run as high as 14.0 per cent within recent memory.

6.2 Keeping

Contract retention is worth more than new business. A caterer that holds a site for five years earns from it without repeating the bid cost, the mobilisation cost or the settling-in period during which margins are always worst.

  • Consistency beats creativity. A staff canteen customer wants the same good meal at the same time every day. Novelty is an events proposition, not a contract one.
  • Manage the client, not just the kitchen. A monthly review with the site HR or facilities manager, with feedback data, prevents the surprise non-renewal.
  • Never fail a food safety audit. One serious incident ends the contract and contaminates every reference.

Cost of a lost contract

Detail

Order of magnitude

Revenue foregone

A 15% volume contract at Year 5 scale

R4.77m of revenue

Contribution foregone

At the industrial contribution rate

Roughly R1.43m of EBITDA

Bid cost to replace

Days of bid assembly, costing and site visits

Part of the R268 000 bid function

Mobilisation cost

Site equipment, staffing, menu establishment

Part of the R320 000 site equipment line

Settling-in margin

The period during which food cost runs above target

Two to three months of below-target margin

Cover impact

Debt service cover from 1.33x

Falls to 0.41x on the scenario in Section 16