15.1 Basis of preparation
Sponsor headline revenue and EBITDA are preserved exactly as briefed. Everything beneath EBITDA is independently re-derived: component depreciation from the capital-expenditure register (tanker trucks on a 7-year life, storage tanks 10-year, depot leasehold improvements 5-year, workshop equipment 8-year, mobile treatment units 8-year and GPS/IT systems 4-year), interest on vehicle asset finance at 13.0% (prime plus 250 basis points), 27% South African corporate tax with assessed-loss carry-forward, and working capital. Consistent with the invitation to structure the raise across funding rounds, and with the brief’s equity-and-debt basis, the plan is funded through a R16.5 million Series A (Year 1; R10.5 million equity and R6.0 million asset finance) and a R14 million Series B (Year 3). The three statements integrate and the balance sheet ties to zero every year, enforced by an automated assertion. All figures are nominal rand millions unless stated.
15.2 Key assumptions
|
Assumption |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Corporate tax rate |
27% |
SA rate; assessed losses carried forward |
|
Vehicle asset-finance rate |
13.0% |
Prime 10.5% + 250bps; secured on fleet |
|
Working capital |
12% of revenue |
Municipal & industrial contract receivables |
|
Funding |
R18.5m equity + R12m finance |
Series A R16.5m + Series B R14m |
|
Depreciation |
Component approach |
Tankers 7-yr; tanks 10-yr; depot 5-yr; workshop/treatment 8-yr; IT 4-yr |
|
Fleet |
4 → 16 tankers |
Utilisation 62% → 80% |
|
Repo / prime |
7.0% / 10.5% |
SARB, mid-2026 |
|
Exit valuation |
5×–8× EV/EBITDA |
Logistics / utility-services comparables |
Analyst flagRe-derived net profit versus the sponsor’s illustrative figures
Preserving revenue and EBITDA exactly, the fully-loaded model produces net profit of approximately −R0.2m, R1.4m, R2.6m, R5.7m and R10.0m across Years 1–5, running modestly below the sponsor’s illustrative R0.9m to R13.4m, with a small first-year loss. The difference is depreciation, financing and tax: the model applies full component depreciation on the tanker fleet, including the Series-B-funded expansion, plus asset-finance interest and full 27% corporate tax, all of which the sponsor’s simpler forecast treats more lightly. The operating performance (EBITDA) is preserved exactly; the gap is the honest, fully-loaded cost of the fleet, disclosed rather than smoothed.
15.3 Projected profit & loss
|
R millions |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revenue |
13 |
24 |
39 |
58 |
82 |
|
EBITDA |
2.3 |
4.8 |
8.6 |
13.7 |
20.2 |
|
Depreciation |
(1.76) |
(2.29) |
(3.65) |
(4.71) |
(5.45) |
|
EBIT |
0.54 |
2.52 |
4.95 |
8.99 |
14.75 |
|
Interest (asset finance) |
(0.78) |
(0.67) |
(1.36) |
(1.17) |
(1.00) |
|
Profit before tax |
(0.24) |
1.84 |
3.60 |
7.83 |
13.75 |
|
Taxation (27%) |
0.00 |
(0.43) |
(0.97) |
(2.11) |
(3.71) |
|
Net profit after tax |
(0.24) |
1.41 |
2.63 |
5.71 |
10.04 |
|
Net margin |
(1.8%) |
5.9% |
6.7% |
9.9% |
12.2% |
15.4 Projected cash flow statement
|
R millions |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EBITDA |
2.3 |
4.8 |
8.6 |
13.7 |
20.2 |
|
Taxation paid |
0.00 |
(0.43) |
(0.97) |
(2.11) |
(3.71) |
|
Working-capital movement |
(1.56) |
(1.32) |
(1.80) |
(2.28) |
(2.88) |
|
Operating cash flow |
0.74 |
3.05 |
5.83 |
9.31 |
13.61 |
|
Capital expenditure |
(11.7) |
(3.7) |
(9.1) |
(7.6) |
(6.9) |
|
Interest & debt service |
(1.62) |
(1.39) |
(2.82) |
(2.42) |
(2.08) |
|
Equity & asset finance raised |
16.5 |
0.0 |
14.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Closing cash |
3.9 |
1.9 |
9.8 |
9.1 |
13.7 |
StrengthThe two-round structure keeps the business well-funded throughout
Operating cash flow is positive from Year 1, and the two rounds plus asset finance comfortably fund the phased fleet build: closing cash never falls below roughly R1.9m and builds toward R14m by Year 5. The Series B in Year 3 funds the fleet and regional expansion without straining the balance sheet, and debt-service cover is comfortable throughout. The business is cash-generative and lightly geared, the constraint is contract execution, not solvency.
15.5 Projected balance sheet
|
R millions |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Net fleet & equipment |
9.9 |
11.4 |
16.8 |
19.7 |
21.2 |
|
Net working capital |
1.6 |
2.9 |
4.7 |
7.0 |
9.8 |
|
Cash & equivalents |
3.9 |
1.9 |
9.8 |
9.1 |
13.7 |
|
Total assets |
15.4 |
16.1 |
31.3 |
35.7 |
44.7 |
|
Asset finance (debt) |
5.2 |
4.4 |
9.0 |
7.7 |
6.6 |
|
Share capital (Series A + B) |
10.5 |
10.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
|
Retained earnings |
(0.24) |
1.17 |
3.80 |
9.51 |
19.55 |
|
Total equity |
10.3 |
11.7 |
22.3 |
28.0 |
38.0 |
|
Total funding |
15.4 |
16.1 |
31.3 |
35.7 |
44.7 |
StrengthThe balance sheet ties to zero every year
Total assets equal asset finance plus equity in every projection year, enforced by an automated assertion (maximum difference: 0.0). Share capital steps up from R10.5m to R18.5m as the Series B is drawn in Year 3, the asset finance is secured against the fleet it funds, and retained earnings compound as the business matures, a fully-integrated, self-consistent, lightly-geared three-statement model.
15.7 Asset productivity and contract base
Two further lenses support the projections. Revenue per tanker rises as utilisation, contract density, larger articulated units and premium emergency work leverage the fixed fleet, the operating leverage that drives the margin expansion. And the active-contract base compounds as the sales engine and reputation build, converting each reputable win into recurring revenue and a reference for the next contract.
|
Metric |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tankers in fleet |
4 |
6 |
8 |
12 |
16 |
|
Active contracts |
8 |
16 |
28 |
44 |
64 |
|
Fleet utilisation |
62.0% |
68.0% |
72.0% |
76.0% |
80.0% |
|
Revenue per tanker (R m) |
3.25 |
4.00 |
4.88 |
4.83 |
5.12 |
15.6 Key financial ratios & debt cover
The ratio summary distils the plan’s trajectory: expanding EBITDA and net margins as the fleet scales and utilisation improves, comfortable debt-service cover throughout, and a lightly-geared, cash-generative balance sheet.
|
Ratio |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EBITDA margin |
17.7% |
20.0% |
22.1% |
23.6% |
24.6% |
|
Net margin |
(1.8%) |
5.9% |
6.7% |
9.9% |
12.2% |
|
DSCR (x) |
1.42× |
3.45× |
3.05× |
5.65× |
9.69× |
|
Net debt / EBITDA (x) |
0.5× |
0.5× |
(0.1)× |
(0.1)× |
(0.3)× |
|
Fleet utilisation |
62.0% |
68.0% |
72.0% |
76.0% |
80.0% |