HelioForge Power Energy Systems Business Plan — Projected Balance Sheet

Jump to sectionAll 21 pages
Section 16 · 17 of 21

Projected Balance Sheet

The balance sheet below ties in every year, total assets equal total equity and liabilities, a consistency enforced by assertion in the underlying model. It reflects the asset profile of an integrated manufacturer: a plant, machinery, battery-assembly and distribution base; working capital that scales with module and battery inventory and EPC receivables; and a cash buffer maintained through the build.

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Assets

Net property, plant & equipment

160

274

350

351

343

Working capital

55

99

156

231

319

Cash & equivalents

179

168

118

119

171

Total assets

393

540

623

702

832

Equity & liabilities

Share capital

216

216

216

216

216

Retained earnings

27

90

187

354

616

Total equity

243

306

403

570

832

Senior debt

150

234

220

132

0

Total equity & liabilities

393

540

623

702

832

Figure 21. Balance sheet composition — total assets by category

Asset backing and collateral cover

The balance sheet is anchored by a tangible asset base, the manufacturing plant, machinery, battery-assembly facility and distribution infrastructure, alongside working capital that itself represents realisable module and battery inventory and EPC receivables. For a lender this matters: the debt is secured against real, cash-generating industrial assets plus liquid working-capital collateral, and the deleveraging profile is rapid. Working capital scales at about 13% of revenue net of payables, and the cash balance remains positive throughout, though it runs tighter in the peak-build years, which is why the working-capital facility is a structural requirement.

Leverage profile

Net debt to EBITDA stays below 0.5x throughout, conservative for an asset-backed manufacturer, and the business is near net-cash by Year 5 as EBITDA scales and debt fully amortises. The equity-first drawdown keeps Year-1 net debt negative, and the low peak leverage leaves ample covenant headroom. The plan is, if anything, under-levered against its earnings, which is part of why the equity returns are so high.

Figure 22. Deleveraging profile — net debt / EBITDA