Tarlton Beetroot Business Plan — Customer Problem, Value Proposition and Monetisation
What fresh-produce buyers need from a beetroot supplier, and how the business converts that into revenue.
Section 5 of 37
Customer Problem, Value Proposition and Monetisation
Jump to section
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Investment Thesis
- 3. Company, Structure and Stage of Development
- 4. Customer Problem, Value Proposition and Monetisation
- 5. Products, Portfolio and Unit Economics
- 6. Industry Analysis
- 7. Market Analysis and Sizing
- 8. Customer and Channel Analysis
- 9. Competitive Landscape
- 10. Business Model
- 11. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 12. Operating Model: Agronomy and Production
- 13. Operating Model: Post-Harvest, Packhouse and Logistics
- 14. Water, Energy and Land: The Three Binding Constraints
- 15. Management and Organisation
- 16. Strategic Plan
- 17. SWOT Analysis
- 18. Risk Analysis and Register
- 19. ESG and Development Impact
- 20. Implementation Roadmap
- 21. Financial Assumptions
- 22. Projected Income Statement
- 23. Projected Balance Sheet
- 24. Projected Cash Flow
- 25. Capital Expenditure and Working Capital
- 26. Funding Requirement and Structure
- 27. Break-even Analysis
- 28. Debt Serviceability
- 29. Investment Returns and Valuation
- 30. Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
- 31. Phase 3: Processing Optionality
- 32. Key Performance Indicators and Management Dashboard
- 33. Conclusion and Investment Recommendation
- A. Appendix A: Monthly Projections, Year 1
- B. Appendix B: Detailed Assumptions Register
- C. Appendix C: Glossary
Retailers and wholesalers do not have a beetroot shortage. They have a consistency problem — and consistency is what a certified, staggered-planting supplier sells.
The problem, stated from the buyer’s side
South African beetroot supply is fragmented across several thousand growers, most of them planting opportunistically and selling into municipal markets when they have volume. The consequence for a formal buyer is not scarcity but unpredictability: volumes arrive in gluts and gaps, quality is inconsistent between consignments, traceability is often absent, and the supplier who delivered last month may have nothing this month. A category buyer running a pre-packed beetroot line needs an agreed volume, at an agreed specification, every week, with audit-ready documentation behind it.
Table 6 Customer problem, solution, value and monetisation
|
Customer problem |
Existing alternative |
Company solution |
How value is monetised |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Supply gaps in shoulder and winter months |
Buy on the market at whatever price is being asked |
Staggered plantings across nine months, sized so that no month has zero harvest |
Seasonal supply agreement priced above the annual market mean in exchange for continuity |
|
Inconsistent size grading and soil contamination |
Sort at the distribution centre or accept markdowns |
Wash, hydro-cool and grade on site to an agreed specification before dispatch |
Pack margin retained rather than surrendered to a third-party packer |
|
No traceability for private-label listings |
Restrict listings to accredited suppliers only |
GLOBALG.A.P. certification with lot-level traceability from Year 3 |
Access to a channel that pays R9.80 per kilogram against R6.30 net on the market |
|
Shrinkage from poor post-harvest handling |
Accept a higher waste allowance in the buying price |
Cold chain from field to distribution centre, cutting shrink at the shelf |
Lower claim and rejection rates support price retention |
Quantifying the economic value to the buyer
The value proposition can be sized. A retail distribution centre handling 40 tonnes of beetroot per month at an average buying price of R9.80 per kilogram spends R3.92 million a year on the category. Typical shrinkage and out-of-specification rejection on unwashed, ungraded market-sourced product runs at 9 to 14 per cent. Reducing that to 4 to 6 per cent through washed, graded, cold-chained supply is worth R235,000 to R390,000 a year on that volume alone, before any consideration of the labour saved sorting at the distribution centre or the margin recovered on markdowns avoided.
That is the economic argument for paying R9.80 per kilogram to a certified supplier rather than R7.20 gross on the market floor. It is also why the Company’s pricing premium is defensible rather than aspirational: it is a share of a cost saving the buyer can measure.
05