Tarlton Beetroot Business Plan — ESG and Development Impact
Water stewardship, soil practice, employment creation and the development impact of the operation.
Section 20 of 37
ESG and Development Impact
Jump to section
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Investment Thesis
- 3. Company, Structure and Stage of Development
- 4. Customer Problem, Value Proposition and Monetisation
- 5. Products, Portfolio and Unit Economics
- 6. Industry Analysis
- 7. Market Analysis and Sizing
- 8. Customer and Channel Analysis
- 9. Competitive Landscape
- 10. Business Model
- 11. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 12. Operating Model: Agronomy and Production
- 13. Operating Model: Post-Harvest, Packhouse and Logistics
- 14. Water, Energy and Land: The Three Binding Constraints
- 15. Management and Organisation
- 16. Strategic Plan
- 17. SWOT Analysis
- 18. Risk Analysis and Register
- 19. ESG and Development Impact
- 20. Implementation Roadmap
- 21. Financial Assumptions
- 22. Projected Income Statement
- 23. Projected Balance Sheet
- 24. Projected Cash Flow
- 25. Capital Expenditure and Working Capital
- 26. Funding Requirement and Structure
- 27. Break-even Analysis
- 28. Debt Serviceability
- 29. Investment Returns and Valuation
- 30. Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
- 31. Phase 3: Processing Optionality
- 32. Key Performance Indicators and Management Dashboard
- 33. Conclusion and Investment Recommendation
- A. Appendix A: Monthly Projections, Year 1
- B. Appendix B: Detailed Assumptions Register
- C. Appendix C: Glossary
A credible development case on employment and land productivity; a modest one on environment; and governance that is thin until Series A.
Table 30 ESG assessment against development finance criteria
|
Pillar |
Position |
Evidence and honest limitation |
|---|---|---|
|
Employment |
34 permanent and up to 55 seasonal positions at Year 5, from 3.5 permanent at inception |
Job creation is real and measurable, but the majority of positions are entry-level field and packhouse roles at or moderately above the sectoral minimum. The plan does not claim to create high-skill employment at scale. |
|
Water |
Drip irrigation with fertigation throughout; no overhead sprinkler |
Application efficiency of roughly 90 per cent against 65 to 75 per cent for overhead systems. The operation nonetheless consumes 520,000 to 580,000 cubic metres a year in a stressed catchment, which is a genuine environmental cost, not a benefit. |
|
Energy and carbon |
100 kWp solar from month 31 displacing daytime pumping load |
Displaces an estimated 160 to 190 MWh annually. Meaningful at operation scale; immaterial at national scale. Presented as cost control with a co-benefit. |
|
Soil |
Mandatory one-in-three rotation with sweetcorn, cabbage, butternut and green beans |
Rotation is driven by disease management, not by an environmental commitment. The soil health benefit is real and incidental. |
|
Food system |
2,215 tonnes of a nutrient-dense vegetable into a metropolitan market at Year 5 |
Domestic food supply contribution is genuine. The Company does not claim to increase national supply, since output largely substitutes for other domestic growers. |
|
Governance |
Four-person board with an independent chairperson from Series A; reserved matters; monthly reporting |
Governance before month 27 is materially thinner than a development finance institution would normally require. This is disclosed rather than dressed up. |
|
Transformation |
Not yet structured |
No BBBEE ownership structure is proposed in this plan. Investors for whom this is a threshold requirement should treat it as an open item to be negotiated at Series A, not as something already addressed. |
20