Laptop China Import Example Business Plan South Africa

Investor-grade laptop import and distribution memorandum: R549.1m Year 5 revenue on an 18.9% gross margin, constrained by working capital.

Midrand Compute Distribution — a notebook computer of the kind imported, configured and distributed by the business

Business Plan & Investment Proposal · South Africa

Laptop Import & Distribution Business Plan — South Africa

Midrand Compute Distribution (Pty) Ltd · Working Capital, Not Fixed Assets, Is The Binding Constraint.

A notebook and computing hardware import and distribution platform at Midrand —
sourcing from Chinese OEM and ODM suppliers, holding and configuring stock locally, and selling through resellers,
corporates and public sector buyers. Revenue builds from R155.9 million to R549.1 million over five years
at a gross margin near 19 per cent, with EBITDA reaching R41.4 million and an import-finance facility
peaking at R19.1 million.

R549.1mYear 5 revenue

18.9%Year 5 gross margin

R41.4mYear 5 EBITDA

0.1xYear 5 net debt / EBITDA

The memorandum states its own constraint in its first sentence, which saves a reader
a good deal of work: this is a capital-light distribution platform in which working capital, not fixed assets, is the
binding constraint. It needs a warehouse and a team rather than a plant — but every rand of growth has to be
funded into dollar-priced stock that ships weeks before a rand-paying reseller settles. That shapes everything else.
Gross margin is essentially flat across the projection, 18.3 per cent rising only to 18.9, because distribution
margin is set by the channel rather than won by the operator. So the entire earnings improvement — EBITDA margin
from 1.7 to 7.5 per cent as revenue more than triples to R549.1 million — is operating leverage,
fixed overhead spread across a much larger book. And closing cash sits at exactly R3.0 million in every single
year, because cash generated is recycled into inventory rather than banked.

What the money is actually for

The asset this business does not need, and the one that limits how fast it can grow.

Fixed assetsWhat this business barely needsA warehouse, some configuration benches and a team. Capital-light by construction, which is why the plan never asks for a plant.

but

Working capitalWhat actually limits itStock is bought in dollars and shipped weeks before a reseller pays in rand. Every rand of growth has to be funded into inventory first — the memorandum says so in its opening line.

Key measures

Six measures that determine whether this platform and its funding stand up.

Working capitalThe binding constraintStated in the memorandum’s own first sentence. Stock is bought in dollars and shipped long before a reseller settles in rand.

18.3% → 18.9%Gross margin, near flatBarely moves across five years. Distribution margin is set by the channel, not by the operator, so volume is the only lever.

R549.1mYear 5 revenueFrom R155.9m. Revenue more than triples while the margin percentage stays essentially where it started.

1.7% → 7.5%EBITDA marginAll of the improvement is operating leverage — fixed overhead spread across a much larger book, not better buying.

R3.0mClosing cash, every single yearHeld flat by design. Cash generated is recycled into stock rather than accumulated, which is what a working-capital business does.

10.0x → 0.1xNet debt to EBITDAYear 1 gearing looks alarming on a thin first-year EBITDA, and then resolves almost entirely by Year 5.

Revenue and earnings

Revenue and EBITDA on the base case. The exchange rate and gross margin are the two
assumptions that matter most, and both are stressed in Section 22.

Revenue build — and the gross margin it is struck on

Year 1R155.9m · 18.3% GM
Year 2R226.5m · 18.5%
Year 3R315.0m · 18.6%
Year 4R422.8m · 18.8%
Year 5R549.1m · 18.9%

Revenue more than triples to R549.1m while gross margin barely moves, from 18.3% to 18.9%. Distribution margin is set by the channel; only volume is the operator’s to win.

EBITDA and margin across the plan period

Year 1R2.7m · 1.7%
Year 2R8.8m · 3.9%
Year 3R16.4m · 5.2%
Year 4R27.5m · 6.5%
Year 5R41.4m · 7.5%

EBITDA is positive from Year 1 and grows fifteen-fold to R41.4m. The margin climbs from 1.7% to 7.5% purely on operating leverage — gross margin contributes almost nothing.

How to read this plan

Working capital is the constraint, and the plan leads with it

The opening sentence names it: capital-light in fixed assets, but every rand of growth must be funded into dollar-priced stock weeks before a rand-paying customer settles.

Margin is set by the channel, not the operator

Gross margin moves from 18.3% to 18.9% across five years — essentially flat. Nobody is going to negotiate their way to a better distribution margin, so volume is the whole game.

The earnings improvement is pure operating leverage

EBITDA margin rises from 1.7% to 7.5% on unchanged gross margin. Every point of it comes from spreading fixed overhead across a book that more than triples.

Cash is recycled, not accumulated

Closing cash sits at exactly R3.0 million in every year of the projection. That is a deliberate choice: cash generated goes straight back into inventory.

Year 1 gearing looks worse than it is

Net debt to EBITDA opens at 10.0 times because first-year EBITDA is thin, then falls to 0.1 times by Year 5. The ratio is a function of the denominator, not of reckless borrowing.

Selected exhibits

Scenario comparison — Year-5 EBITDA and 5-year investor IRR.

Sensitivity of Year-5 EBITDA to key variables (tornado).

Cumulative revenue versus full-cost recovery — break-even reached early in Year 2.

Strictly confidential. This document is delivered in confidence to the named
recipient and may not be reproduced or circulated, in whole or in part, without prior written consent.