Midrand Compute Distribution Business Plan — Funding Requirement and Structure

The funding requirement and the import-finance facility, drawn to R19.1m at peak and repaid to R8.7m by Year 5.

Section 20 of 25

Funding Requirement and Structure

Jump to section

R25m of equity does the heavy lifting on risk; a committed R55m trade-finance line does the heavy lifting on volume.

Sources and uses of funds — equity and term debt fund the platform; the revolver funds the working-capital book
Figure 1. Sources and uses of funds — equity and term debt fund the platform; the revolver funds the working-capital book.

Use of funds

Use

Amount (R’m)

Note

Capex — DC fit-out, MHE, fleet, IT/ERP, lab

15.5

One-off platform build, largely Year 1

Peak working capital

~34.0

Inventory + receivables, net of payables

Pre-operating & launch

4.0

Recruitment, systems, first marketing

Contingency / minimum cash

4.5

Operating buffer and standby

Table 30. Indicative use of funds (peak requirement).

Funding structure

Instrument

Amount

Role & terms

Equity — Tranche 1

R15.0m

At close; funds capex and initial launch

Equity — Tranche 2

R10.0m

Start of Year 2, milestone-contingent; growth capital

DFI / commercial term loan

R12.0m

5-year, 12.5%, Year-1 interest-only (principal moratorium)

Asset finance

R3.0m

MHE and fleet; 5-year amortising at 13.5%

Import / trade-finance revolver

R55.0m

Committed; secured on stock & receivables; priced ~14.0%

Standby equity (contingency)

~R20m

Uncommitted; triggered only in a stress scenario (Section 21)

Table 31. Recommended funding structure — blended equity, DFI/commercial and asset debt, and a trade-finance revolver.

De-leveraging profile — facility utilisation and net debt / EBITDA (base case)
Figure 2. De-leveraging profile — facility utilisation and net debt / EBITDA (base case).

Rationale. Equity absorbs the start-up risk and the illiquid platform build; term and asset debt match long-lived assets to long-term funding; and the revolver, the largest facility, funds the self-liquidating working-capital book, drawn only to need and repaid as stock and receivables convert. In the base case the revolver peaks near R19m (well inside the R55m limit) and net debt/EBITDA falls below 1.5x by Year 3. The R20m standby equity is a deliberate, disclosed contingency against the stress case, not a base-case requirement.

Debt serviceability

The proposed debt is sized to what the cash flows can service, with headroom. Interest cover and DSCR are thin but adequate in Year 1, the interest-only period on the term loan is deliberate, and strengthen rapidly as EBITDA scales and the facilities amortise.

Serviceability metric

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

EBITDA (R’m)

2.7

8.8

16.4

27.5

41.4

Interest cover (EBITDA / interest)

0.9x

2.2x

4.3x

7.6x

17.2x

DSCR

1.1x

1.8x

3.1x

4.5x

6.6x

Net debt / EBITDA

10.0x

2.6x

1.5x

0.7x

0.1x

Total debt (R’m)

30.1

25.6

27.2

22.2

8.7

Table 32. Debt serviceability (base case). Cover ratios move from adequate to comfortable by Year 3.

Debt capacity. By Year 3 the business carries materially less leverage than its cash flows could support, giving it unused debt capacity to fund the regional scale-up without a further equity round, an important source of financing flexibility and a mitigant to funding risk.