Sakhile Construction Business Plan — Returns
What the founders and growth equity investor earn across the horizon, and the return on capital deployed.
Returns
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. The CIDB Grading Ladder
- 3. The Market in 2026
- 4. Strategy: Private Work First
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. The Working Capital Problem
- 7. Retention and Guarantees
- 8. Unit Economics of a Contract
- 9. The Five-Year Roadmap and Gates
- 10. Funding
- 11. Estimating and Contract Control
- 12. People and Plant
- 13. Compliance and Registrations
- 14. Financial Projections
- 15. Break-Even
- 16. Sensitivity and Scenarios
- 17. Risk Management
- 18. Implementation Timeline
- 19. Returns
- 20. Key Performance Indicators
- 21. Key Assumptions
- 22. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
|
Measure |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Founder equity |
R3.20m |
At inception |
|
Growth equity |
R6.50m |
At Year 3 |
|
Total equity subscribed |
R9.70m |
|
|
Shareholders’ funds at Year 5 |
R6.78m |
Net asset value; below the subscription |
|
Year 5 EBITDA |
R3.52m |
At a 6.8% margin |
|
Net debt at Year 5 |
R7.83m |
Asset finance and facility less cash |
|
Enterprise value at a 4.0x exit |
R14.08m |
Applied to Year 5 EBITDA |
|
Terminal equity value at that exit |
R6.25m |
Enterprise value less net debt |
|
Project IRR |
4.3% |
On free cash flow to the firm with a terminal enterprise value |
|
Equity IRR |
-11.5% |
On the two subscriptions with the terminal equity value |
|
Exit multiple at which equity returns its subscription |
4.98x |
Net debt plus subscription, over Year 5 EBITDA |
|
Exit multiple |
Enterprise value |
Terminal equity |
Project IRR |
Equity IRR |
Money multiple |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3.0x |
R10.56m |
R2.73m |
-10.5% |
-30.3% |
0.28x |
|
3.5x |
R12.32m |
R4.49m |
-2.5% |
-19.4% |
0.46x |
|
4.0x |
R14.08m |
R6.25m |
4.3% |
-11.5% |
0.64x |
|
4.5x |
R15.84m |
R8.01m |
10.4% |
-5.1% |
0.83x |
|
5.0x |
R17.59m |
R9.77m |
15.8% |
0.2% |
1.01x |
|
5.5x |
R19.35m |
R11.53m |
20.7% |
4.8% |
1.19x |
|
6.0x |
R21.11m |
R13.29m |
25.2% |
8.9% |
1.37x |
19.1 What the value actually is at Year 5
|
Asset |
Year 5 position |
Comment |
|---|---|---|
|
CIDB Grade 6GB registration |
Held on both capability tests |
Takes five years to build and cannot be bought |
|
Completed contract record |
Eighteen contracts a year, none loss-making at final account |
The works capability that supports the next grade |
|
Order book and client relationships |
R52.00m of annual turnover, 53.8% public |
Repeatable and grade-building |
|
Estimating and quantity surveying function |
R810 000 of annual cost, established |
The function that determines margin in this sector |
|
Plant, vehicles and equipment |
R4.99m net book value |
The smallest component of what is being valued |
|
Working capital position |
R9.62m, funded |
What an acquirer would otherwise have to put up |
A buyer acquiring this business at Year 5 is buying a graded, systematised contractor with a funded working capital position and a record that permits it to bid work most of its competitors cannot. The plant is R4.99 million of that; the rest is the grade and the organisation. Whether that is worth four times EBITDA or six is a judgement about the construction cycle rather than about this business, and it is the single largest determinant of the equity outcome.