Lesedi Solar Care Business Plan — The Soiling Problem & Value Proposition
Soiling is the accumulation of dust, sand, pollen, agricultural spray drift, industrial fallout and bird droppings on module glass. It scatters and absorbs…
The Soiling Problem & Value Proposition
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- Important Notice & Confidentiality
- Executive Summary
- Company Overview & Governance
- Industry & Market Analysis
- The Soiling Problem & Value Proposition
- Market Sizing & Demand Drivers
- Services & Revenue Model
- Contract Economics & Unit Analysis
- Technology, Method & the Water Constraint
- The LumenIQ Platform
- Operations Plan & Depot Network
- Go-to-Market & Contracting Strategy
- Competitive Positioning
- Health, Safety & Quality Systems
- Implementation Roadmap
- Financial Plan & Projections
- Funding Requirement & Use of Funds
- Returns, Scenarios & Sensitivity
- Risk Analysis & Independent Findings
- SWOT & Strategic Analysis
- Management Team & Organisation
- Transformation, ESG & Water Stewardship
- Growth Strategy, Exit & Conclusion
- Annexure A: Detailed Financial Projections
- Annexure B: Assumptions Book
- Annexure C: Scenario & Sensitivity Detail
- Annexure D: Contract Unit Economics
- Annexure E: Risk Register
- Annexure F: Glossary & Methodology
4.1 What soiling costs an owner
Soiling is the accumulation of dust, sand, pollen, agricultural spray drift, industrial fallout and bird droppings on module glass. It scatters and absorbs incident light before it reaches the cell. The effect is continuous, non-linear and highly site-specific: rates depend on particulate load, tilt angle, humidity, wind and rainfall patterns. In South Africa’s semi-arid solar corridors, long dry seasons allow deposition to build for months without natural washing.
|
Site context |
Typical annual soiling loss |
Peak dry-season rate |
|---|---|---|
|
Northern Cape utility plant (arid, dusty) |
6% – 9% |
up to 1.0%/week |
|
Free State / North West (agricultural) |
4% – 7% |
0.6%/week at harvest |
|
Coastal Western Cape (salt, wetter) |
2% – 4% |
0.3%/week |
|
Urban C&I rooftop (industrial fallout) |
3% – 6% |
0.5%/week |
4.2 The arithmetic clients can verify
A 75 MW plant generating roughly 172 GWh a year at an average realised tariff of R1.05 per kilowatt-hour produces approximately R180 million of annual revenue. A 5.8% recovered-yield improvement from a disciplined cleaning programme is worth about R10.4 million a year to the owner. Lesedi’s full-service contract on that plant is priced at R7.1 million. The client is cash-positive on the cleaning benefit alone, before counting availability improvements, fault detection, warranty preservation and avoided module replacement. This is why the sale is a data conversation rather than a price negotiation, and it is the single most important commercial fact in the Plan.
4.3 Beyond cleaning: the full loss stack
|
Loss mechanism |
Lesedi intervention |
|---|---|
|
Soiling |
Scheduled cleaning cycles calibrated to site-specific soiling rate measured by reference cells |
|
String and combiner faults |
Continuous LumenIQ monitoring with automated deviation alerts and dispatch |
|
Inverter downtime |
Preventive servicing, spares pooling, guaranteed response times under SLA |
|
Module defects (hotspots, PID, cracking) |
Annual drone thermography and IV curve tracing; warranty claim substantiation |
|
Tracker misalignment |
Mechanical inspection and calibration within the preventive schedule |
|
Vegetation and shading |
Managed vegetation programme integrated into the site plan |
|
Theft and damage |
Perimeter integrity checks; incident escalation protocol |
The breadth of this stack matters commercially as well as technically. Cleaning is the entry point because it is easy to price and easy to prove, but the recurring revenue and the switching costs come from the full stack. An owner who has handed over monitoring, fault dispatch, warranty substantiation and vegetation management does not change supplier lightly.