Lesedi Solar Care Business Plan — Operations Plan & Depot Network
Field services businesses succeed or fail on route density. Lesedi clusters contracts geographically so that crews, robots and bowsers move between…
Operations Plan & Depot Network
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- Important Notice & Confidentiality
- Executive Summary
- Company Overview & Governance
- Industry & Market Analysis
- The Soiling Problem & Value Proposition
- Market Sizing & Demand Drivers
- Services & Revenue Model
- Contract Economics & Unit Analysis
- Technology, Method & the Water Constraint
- The LumenIQ Platform
- Operations Plan & Depot Network
- Go-to-Market & Contracting Strategy
- Competitive Positioning
- Health, Safety & Quality Systems
- Implementation Roadmap
- Financial Plan & Projections
- Funding Requirement & Use of Funds
- Returns, Scenarios & Sensitivity
- Risk Analysis & Independent Findings
- SWOT & Strategic Analysis
- Management Team & Organisation
- Transformation, ESG & Water Stewardship
- Growth Strategy, Exit & Conclusion
- Annexure A: Detailed Financial Projections
- Annexure B: Assumptions Book
- Annexure C: Scenario & Sensitivity Detail
- Annexure D: Contract Unit Economics
- Annexure E: Risk Register
- Annexure F: Glossary & Methodology
Field services businesses succeed or fail on route density. Lesedi clusters contracts geographically so that crews, robots and bowsers move between neighbouring sites with minimal dead travel. Three depots anchor the initial footprint, each with a workshop, deionised water plant, robot maintenance bay and crew accommodation where sites are remote.
10.1 The depot network
|
Depot |
Coverage |
Rationale |
|---|---|---|
|
Upington (Northern Cape) |
Northern Cape solar belt, southern Free State |
Highest concentration of utility-scale plant and the most severe soiling; also the most water-constrained |
|
Midrand (Gauteng) |
Gauteng, North West, Mpumalanga, Limpopo |
Dense C&I rooftop market; head office and central spares holding |
|
Worcester (Western Cape) |
Western Cape, southern Northern Cape |
Growing utility and agricultural C&I base; different seasonal soiling profile smooths crew utilisation |
The Worcester rationale deserves emphasis because it is a genuinely sophisticated piece of operational design. Coastal Western Cape soiling runs at 2% to 4% annually against 6% to 9% in the Northern Cape, and, critically, it peaks in a different season. A single-region operator faces sharp seasonal swings in crew utilisation; a two-climate operator can move crews between regions as soiling cycles alternate, raising utilisation on a fixed labour base. That is a margin lever unavailable to a regional competitor.
10.2 Organisation at year 3
|
Function |
Headcount |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
|
Executive |
4 |
CEO, CFO, COO, CTO |
|
Regional operations managers |
3 |
One per depot, accountable for SLA and margin |
|
Field supervisors |
9 |
Crew leadership, safety, quality verification |
|
Field technicians & cleaning crew |
78 |
Core delivery workforce; majority recruited locally to depot regions |
|
Robotics & workshop technicians |
8 |
Fleet maintenance, robot deployment and repair |
|
Performance analysts (LumenIQ) |
6 |
Monitoring, dispatch triage, client reporting |
|
Commercial & contracts |
5 |
Bidding, key accounts, renewals |
|
Finance, HR & administration |
7 |
Shared services |
|
Total |
120 |
Excludes contracted security; scaling to ~186 by year 5 |
10.3 Service levels
|
SLA element |
Commitment |
|---|---|
|
Emergency response (utility) |
On site within 8 hours; remote triage within 30 minutes of alarm |
|
Preventive schedule adherence |
≥ 97% of scheduled tasks completed within window |
|
Cleaning cycle compliance |
≥ 98% of contracted cycles delivered, verified by geotagged completion |
|
Plant availability contribution |
≥ 98.5% technical availability on controllable systems |
|
Reporting |
Monthly performance pack by the 7th; quarterly performance review meeting |
|
Recovered yield verification |
Pre- and post-clean performance ratio comparison published per cycle |
Revenue per field employee rises from R415,000 in year one to R798,000 by year seven, a 92% improvement that is the operational expression of route density. It is the metric an investor should track most closely, because it captures crew utilisation, travel efficiency and scheduling quality in a single number, and because it is the mechanism by which the margin trajectory is actually delivered.