Khanya Cold Chain Business Plan — Implementation Roadmap
The timeline from financial close to commissioning on 1 March 2027, covering construction, plant installation and tenant onboarding.
Implementation Roadmap
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. The Business
- 3. Market Analysis
- 4. The Energy Strategy
- 5. Facility and Location
- 6. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 7. Commercial Plan
- 8. Operations
- 9. Financial Plan
- 10. Break-Even and Debt Service
- 11. Investment Analysis
- 12. Risk Analysis
- 13. Implementation Roadmap
- 14. Key Performance Indicators
- 15. Key Assumptions
- 16. Conclusion and Recommendation
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital and Depreciation Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Energy Model
- E. Appendix E: Risk Register
- F. Appendix F: Glossary
- 13.1 Development programme
- 13.2 Critical dependencies
- 13.3 Conditions precedent to drawdown
- 13.4 Operating milestones after commissioning
- 13.5 Where the eighteen months before commissioning go
13.1 Development programme
|
Phase |
Months |
Activities |
Gate |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1. Pre-development |
0–4 |
Incorporate; appoint executive team; agree heads of terms on the lease; firm fixed-price refrigeration and envelope tender |
Anchor tenancy of 1 200 pallets contracted; notified maximum demand and Megaflex tariff confirmed in writing |
|
2. Approvals and close |
2–9 |
Ammonia major hazard installation risk assessment and emergency plan; municipal and environmental approvals; refrigerant handling registration; funding close |
MHI approval issued — the gating item in the programme. Equity drawn and facilities closed |
|
3. Construction |
7–17 |
Lease signed; tenant installation of envelope and panelling; refrigeration plant, ammonia charge and commissioning; solar, battery and standby; racking, docks and materials handling; WMS and control room |
Plant validated, temperature pull-down complete |
|
4. Year 1 trading |
17–29 |
Commissioning 1 March 2027; ramp from 19% to 55% occupancy; three rigids operating; FSSC 22000 or BRCGS certification |
Certification achieved by month 12 of trading |
|
5. Year 2 and 3 |
29–53 |
Occupancy to 68% then 79%; fleet to 6 then 9 vehicles; first capital repayment falls due at the end of the moratorium |
Year 3 debt service cover clears 1.30x at 79% occupancy |
13.2 Critical dependencies
|
Dependency |
What it gates |
Why it cannot be accelerated |
|---|---|---|
|
Anchor tenancy of 1 200 positions |
Every drawdown of capital |
Year 1 occupancy of 46% against a 56% break-even is where this plan is most exposed. Contracts take six to nine months to close |
|
Ammonia major hazard installation approval |
Commissioning |
A statutory process with mandatory risk assessment and emergency planning. Capable of delaying commissioning by months and not within the developer’s control |
|
Notified maximum demand at the connection |
The entire energy thesis |
A refrigeration plant of this size cannot simply be connected wherever a building is cheapest. Written confirmation is a condition precedent |
|
Firm refrigeration and envelope pricing |
Construction drawdown |
50% of capital expenditure on indicative pricing. A 15% overrun is R6 675 000 |
|
Ten-year lease with renewal options |
Fixing R89 800 000 of plant into the building |
Negotiating leverage exists only before the plant is installed. A purchase option is close to unobtainable at renewal |
|
Committed R12 000 000 revolver |
Year 2 working capital |
Sought when Year 2 needs it, it will be priced against a business below covenant. Committed at first close it costs a facility fee |
|
FSSC 22000 or BRCGS certification |
Retail-bound and export volume |
Not a differentiator but the price of entry. Requires twelve months of operating records |
13.3 Conditions precedent to drawdown
13.4 Operating milestones after commissioning
|
Milestone |
Target date |
Measure |
Consequence if missed |
|---|---|---|---|
|
First pallets received |
Month 17 |
Plant validated, temperature pull-down complete, WMS live |
Every month of delay is roughly R1.9 million of fixed cost against no revenue |
|
Anchor tenants in occupation |
Month 18 |
1 200 positions occupied under contract |
The Year 1 ramp assumption fails at its starting point |
|
32% occupancy |
Month 6 of trading |
Weekly occupancy report |
Trigger point: freeze vehicle purchases and all discretionary capital |
|
FSSC 22000 or BRCGS certification |
Month 12 of trading |
Certificate issued |
Retail-bound and export volume is unavailable; the addressable market narrows sharply |
|
40% average occupancy |
Month 12 of trading |
Twelve-month average |
Trigger point: formal lender review |
|
Blast tunnel utilisation above 35% |
Month 18 |
Tonnes processed against 40 tonnes a day capacity |
The premium service is not selling; review pricing and whether capacity was over-specified |
|
Debt service cover above 1.00x |
Month 24 |
Rolling twelve-month EBITDA against service |
Trigger point: approach lenders for restructuring before breach |
|
68.9% occupancy |
Year 3 |
Weekly occupancy report |
The 1.30x covenant is not met even on a Year 3 test |
The occupancy milestones are deliberately set below the plan rather than at it. A business that treats its plan as its floor has no early warning system; one that sets its triggers a few points below has time to act. Each of the four occupancy triggers above corresponds to a committed response in Section 12.4, agreed as board policy before drawdown.
13.5 Where the eighteen months before commissioning go
A funder reviewing this programme should understand that the seventeen months between inception and commissioning are not slack. Three activities run in parallel and each has a hard dependency that cannot be compressed.
|
Activity |
Duration |
Why it takes this long |
What happens if it is rushed |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Anchor tenancy contracting |
Months 0 to 11 |
A six to nine month sales cycle into food manufacturers and protein importers, each of whom is displacing an incumbent arrangement |
Positions are contracted at whatever rate is available rather than at the rate card, permanently impairing the revenue base |
|
Ammonia MHI approval |
Months 2 to 7 |
A statutory process requiring a risk assessment, an emergency plan tested with the local authority and competent-person sign-off |
Commissioning slips by months against a fixed lease and a fixed interest bill |
|
Construction and commissioning |
Months 7 to 17 |
Envelope, plant installation, ammonia charge, pull-down and validation, each dependent on the previous |
Validation failures discovered after product is in the chamber rather than before |
The critical path runs through the ammonia approval, not through construction. That is the finding a developer used to conventional industrial fit-out most often misses, and it is why the approval is placed early in the programme and treated as a gate rather than as a parallel workstream. A refrigeration contractor can compress a build; nobody can compress a regulator.