Khanya Cold Chain Business Plan — Market Analysis

Demand for third-party cold storage in Gauteng, the competitive field of incumbent operators, and where capacity is genuinely short.

Market Analysis

Jump to section
On this page

  • 3.1 A market that cannot be measured precisely
  • 3.2 Demand drivers
  • 3.3 Competitive landscape

3.1 A market that cannot be measured precisely

Any cold chain business plan that quotes a confident market size is overstating what is knowable. There is no comprehensive public inventory of South African cold storage capacity: no official database of pallet positions, cubic metres, facility ages or utilisation rates. Published estimates of the market’s value differ by an order of magnitude, and capacity estimates range from roughly 400 000 to 600 000 commercial pallet positions, excluding retailer and manufacturer-owned space that is not available to the general market.

This plan therefore does not rest on a market-share argument. It rests on a cost argument: at roughly R240 per occupied pallet per week at maturity, against a published SME spot reference of about R450 per pallet per week for chilled space, the pricing is set well below the visible top of the market. The question is not whether demand exists at that price. It is whether this operator can fill 4 500 positions within three years.

3.2 Demand drivers

Target segments by share of revenue and average pallet dwell
Figure 5. Target segments by share of revenue and average pallet dwell.

Segment

Revenue share

Average dwell

Regime

Role in the mix

Protein importers and processors

34%

48 days

Frozen

The stable base load that keeps occupancy from collapsing between seasons

Food manufacturers

26%

31 days

Frozen and chilled

Outsourcing capital commitment into operating cost under working capital pressure

Food service and QSR distribution

21%

17 days

Chilled

Short dwell, high turn, and the segment that most requires the fleet

Fresh produce and packhouses

12%

9 days

Chilled

Sharp seasonal peaks a flexible operator can price for

Retail and wholesale overflow

7%

12 days

Mixed

Low-margin work that fills otherwise empty space and creates the relationship

The segment mix is constructed to balance dwell against turn. Protein importers at 48 days average dwell provide the stable base load that keeps occupancy from collapsing between seasons; food service at 17 days provides handling revenue, which is priced per event and is materially more profitable per unit of space than storage alone. A store filled entirely with long-dwell frozen protein would look stable and earn poorly.

3.3 Competitive landscape

Competitive positioning on scale against service breadth
Figure 6. Competitive positioning on scale against service breadth.

Competitor group

Approximate scale

Position and how Khanya differs

National integrated operators

100 000+ positions

Serve national retail and manufacturing at a cost per pallet Khanya cannot match. Khanya does not compete for this work

Large regional operators

15 000–90 000

Port-adjacent and metro facilities with bonded and export capability. The nearest genuine competitors for contract volume

Market and municipal facilities

4 000–6 000

Joburg Market’s cold rooms and similar. Cheap, functional, and limited in service breadth and flexibility

Small independents

2 000–8 000

Flexible and relationship-driven, but rarely offering blast freezing, certification-grade quality systems or distribution

Reefer container yards

Variable

Rent at roughly R130–R220 per day. Genuinely competitive for short-term overflow; not for contract-grade storage

Previous section2. The Business