Khanya Cold Chain Business Plan — The Business
The multi-temperature store and refrigerated distribution model: 2,600 frozen, 1,500 chilled and 400 ambient pallet positions.
The Business
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. The Business
- 3. Market Analysis
- 4. The Energy Strategy
- 5. Facility and Location
- 6. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 7. Commercial Plan
- 8. Operations
- 9. Financial Plan
- 10. Break-Even and Debt Service
- 11. Investment Analysis
- 12. Risk Analysis
- 13. Implementation Roadmap
- 14. Key Performance Indicators
- 15. Key Assumptions
- 16. Conclusion and Recommendation
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital and Depreciation Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Energy Model
- E. Appendix E: Risk Register
- F. Appendix F: Glossary
- 2.1 What the business does
- 2.2 Legal structure and compliance perimeter
- 2.3 What this business is not
2.1 What the business does
|
Service line |
What it is |
Why it is in the plan |
|---|---|---|
|
Frozen storage |
2 600 positions at −25°C |
The margin engine and the thermal battery that makes load shifting possible |
|
Chilled storage |
1 500 positions at 0–5°C |
Higher turn, shorter dwell, and the entry point for most new customers |
|
Ambient and staging |
400 positions |
Consolidation, cross-dock and dry components of mixed orders |
|
Blast freezing |
40 tonnes per day |
High-value service few independents offer; wins the manufacturer relationship |
|
Handling and value-added |
Receiving, picking, labelling, re-palletising |
Priced per event; roughly a fifth of cold store revenue |
|
Refrigerated distribution |
3 rigids growing to 12 |
Required to win storage contracts; thin margin in its own right |
2.2 Legal structure and compliance perimeter
|
Item |
Detail |
|---|---|
|
Entity |
KHANYA COLD CHAIN (Pty) Ltd, registered with the CIPC |
|
Tax |
South African resident company; corporate income tax at 27%. The Small Business Corporation regime is not available at this scale |
|
VAT |
Compulsory registration from the outset |
|
Food safety |
R638 food premises certificate of acceptability; FSSC 22000 or BRCGS certification targeted by month 12 |
|
Ammonia refrigeration |
Major hazard installation obligations: risk assessment, emergency plan, competent-person inspections, pressure equipment regulations |
|
Occupational health and safety |
OHS Act, cold work exposure controls, confined space and machinery regulations |
|
Transport |
Operator licensing, roadworthiness, driver hours, and cold chain traceability obligations for the fleet |
|
Environmental |
Refrigerant handling and reporting; ammonia is preferred over synthetic refrigerants partly for this reason |
The choice of ammonia over a synthetic refrigerant is a deliberate trade-off and should be understood as such. Ammonia is materially more energy-efficient, has no global warming potential, and is the standard for industrial frozen storage at this scale, all of which supports the energy thesis in Section 4. It is also toxic, which brings the major hazard installation regime, a mandatory risk assessment, an emergency plan tested with the local authority, and a higher insurance premium. Section 12.1 rates this as a high-impact, low-likelihood risk; the plan does not treat it as a formality.
2.3 What this business is not
- It is not a national third-party logistics provider. Nothing in this plan supports a second site. A multi-site network requires a different capital structure and a national customer base, neither of which is contemplated here.
- It is not a property investment. The building is leased. The capital goes into refrigeration plant, envelope and equipment, which are worth substantially less than cost if the venture fails, see Section 12.3.
- It is not a trucking business. The fleet is sized to serve stored volume, not to chase line-haul work. Section 8.3 explains why the fleet is deliberately capped.
- It is not an early-stage venture in the funding sense. The return profile in Section 11 is infrastructure-like: moderate, slow, and dependent on an exit or refinancing rather than on growth.