15.1 Basis of preparation
Sponsor headline revenue and EBITDA are preserved exactly as briefed. Everything beneath EBITDA is independently re-derived: component depreciation from the capital-expenditure register, South African corporate tax at 27% with assessed-loss carry-forward, and working capital. The base case is funded entirely with the sponsor’s R16 million of equity (no debt), so there is no interest charge; a debt-capacity analysis for lenders is provided in Section 16. The three statements are integrated so the balance sheet ties to zero in every year, enforced by an automated assertion. All figures are nominal rand millions unless stated.
15.2 Key assumptions
|
Assumption |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Corporate tax rate |
27% |
SA rate; turnover exceeds SBC thresholds |
|
Working capital |
5% of revenue |
Cash retail offset by inventory & supplier credit |
|
Funding |
R16m equity |
As briefed; all-equity base case |
|
Depreciation |
Component approach |
Fit-out 10-yr; equipment 8-yr; kitchen 10-yr; mobile 6-yr; cold chain 8-yr; tech 4-yr; kiosk 7-yr |
|
Cumulative capex |
~R44m over 5 years |
Flagship, central kitchen, stores, kiosks & mobile |
|
Repo / prime |
7.0% / 10.5% |
SARB, mid-2026 |
|
Exit valuation |
8×–12× EV/EBITDA |
Branded QSR / franchise comparables |
Analyst flagRe-derived net profit versus the sponsor’s illustrative figures
Preserving revenue and EBITDA exactly, the fully-loaded model produces net profit of approximately R1.2m, R3.7m, R7.7m, R13.2m and R21.2m across Years 1–5, very close to the sponsor’s illustrative R1.2m to R23.8m, and modestly below only in later years. The small later-year gap is depreciation: a genuine multi-format rollout requires roughly R44m of cumulative capex, and depreciating it in full (rather than the lighter capex the illustrative figures imply) is the honest cost of building the network. It is disclosed rather than smoothed.
15.3 Projected profit & loss
|
R millions |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revenue |
18 |
35 |
58 |
87 |
125 |
|
EBITDA |
3.0 |
7.2 |
13.8 |
22.4 |
34.6 |
|
Depreciation & amortisation |
(1.3) |
(2.2) |
(3.2) |
(4.4) |
(5.5) |
|
EBIT |
1.7 |
5.0 |
10.6 |
18.0 |
29.1 |
|
Net interest (all-equity) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Profit before tax |
1.7 |
5.0 |
10.6 |
18.0 |
29.1 |
|
Taxation (27%) |
(0.5) |
(1.4) |
(2.9) |
(4.9) |
(7.9) |
|
Net profit after tax |
1.2 |
3.7 |
7.7 |
13.2 |
21.2 |
|
Net margin |
6.9% |
10.5% |
13.3% |
15.1% |
17.0% |
15.3a Flagship store ramp
The flagship store’s illustrative ramp underpins the retail line: rising covers and average ticket as the brand establishes, translating into a maturing store-level contribution that anchors the wider rollout economics.
|
Flagship metric |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Covers (000s) |
180 |
210 |
235 |
255 |
275 |
|
Average ticket (ZAR) |
62 |
66 |
70 |
74 |
78 |
|
Implied flagship revenue (R m) |
11.2 |
13.9 |
16.4 |
18.9 |
21.4 |
15.4 Projected cash flow statement
|
R millions |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EBITDA |
3.0 |
7.2 |
13.8 |
22.4 |
34.6 |
|
Taxation paid |
(0.5) |
(1.4) |
(2.9) |
(4.9) |
(7.9) |
|
Working-capital movement |
(0.9) |
(0.8) |
(1.1) |
(1.4) |
(1.9) |
|
Operating cash flow |
1.6 |
5.0 |
9.8 |
16.1 |
24.8 |
|
Capital expenditure |
(10.4) |
(6.5) |
(7.9) |
(8.9) |
(9.9) |
|
Equity drawn |
16.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Net movement in cash |
7.2 |
(1.5) |
1.9 |
7.2 |
14.9 |
|
Closing cash |
7.2 |
5.7 |
7.6 |
14.8 |
29.7 |
Analyst flagLiquidity tightens as the rollout is self-funded
Operating cash flow is positive from Year 1, but the Pretoria, Cape Town and Durban store rollout consumes most of it: closing cash falls from about R7m in Year 1 to roughly R6m in Year 2 before rebuilding strongly to nearly R30m by Year 5. The R16m funds Phase 1 and a measured rollout from reinvested cash, but a faster pace, a build overrun or a soft ramp would erode the buffer, which is why committed follow-on capital or a working-capital facility is recommended (Section 16).
15.5 Projected balance sheet
|
R millions |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Net property, plant & equipment |
9.1 |
13.4 |
18.1 |
22.7 |
27.1 |
|
Net working capital |
0.9 |
1.8 |
2.9 |
4.3 |
6.3 |
|
Cash & equivalents |
7.2 |
5.7 |
7.6 |
14.8 |
29.7 |
|
Total assets |
17.2 |
20.9 |
28.7 |
41.8 |
63.1 |
|
Share capital |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
16.0 |
|
Retained earnings |
1.2 |
4.9 |
12.7 |
25.8 |
47.1 |
|
Total equity / funding |
17.2 |
20.9 |
28.7 |
41.8 |
63.1 |
StrengthThe balance sheet ties to zero every year
Total assets equal total equity in every projection year (all-equity structure), enforced by an automated assertion (maximum difference: 0.0). The business carries no debt and holds a net-cash position throughout, so it is financially resilient even as it invests, the constraint is the quantum of cash available for expansion, not solvency.
15.6 Key financial ratios
The ratio summary distils the plan’s trajectory: expanding EBITDA and net margins as the higher-margin franchise and packaged mix matures, a consistently net-cash position, and a rising return on the equity invested as the business scales.
|
Ratio |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EBITDA margin |
16.7% |
20.6% |
23.8% |
25.7% |
27.7% |
|
Net margin |
6.9% |
10.5% |
13.3% |
15.1% |
17.0% |
|
Net cash (R m) |
7.2 |
5.7 |
7.6 |
14.8 |
29.7 |
|
Return on equity |
7.2% |
17.6% |
27.0% |
31.5% |
33.7% |
|
Franchise & packaged share |
3.0% |
9.0% |
12.0% |
17.0% |
22.0% |