SA Best Peanut Butter Business Plan — Appendix D: Risk Register
Detailed risk register scoring likelihood and impact, with mitigations and the pre-committed trigger points adopted as policy.
Appendix D: Risk Register
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Aflatoxin: The Question That Defines the Business
- 3. Market, Products and Pricing
- 4. Regulation and Food Safety
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. Operations
- 7. Financial Plan
- 8. Break-Even and Debt Service
- 9. Investment Analysis
- 10. Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
- 11. Risk Analysis
- 12. Implementation Roadmap
- 13. Key Performance Indicators
- 14. Key Assumptions
- 15. Conclusion and Recommendation
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Volume, Kernel and Cost Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding, Debt and Working Capital Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
|
Risk |
Likely |
Impact |
Mitigation and residual position |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Aflatoxin exceedance and recall |
Medium |
Severe |
A one-month recall costs R15881116 against a control programme of R8655900 a year. Mitigated by contracted supply with certificates of analysis, intake and batch testing, optical sorting and lot-level traceability that narrows a recall |
|
Kernel price volatility |
High |
Severe |
Kernels are 45.4% of revenue. Contribution reaches zero at R42269 a tonne against a planned R27 900 — headroom 51.5%. Mitigated by contracted supply and by blending local seasonal purchases with year-round imports |
|
Retail listings not secured |
High |
Severe |
Own-brand listings take longer than the plant takes to build. Mitigated by private label agreements covering at least half of Year 1 volume and by R3 600 000 of listing fees budgeted |
|
Volume below plan |
High |
High |
Break-even is 1161 t on one shift against a capacity of 1 215 t. Mitigated by private label filling the plant while own-brand listings are won |
|
FSSC 22000 certification delayed |
Medium |
Severe |
Without it the plant is limited to food service and industrial channels at materially lower prices. Mitigated by certification before the first commercial batch |
|
Drought in the producing provinces |
Medium |
High |
Local production averages about 62 000 t a year and is drought-exposed. Mitigated by import blending, at the cost of currency exposure |
|
Tariff reviewed or reversed |
Low |
High |
The 20% duty was granted on application and can be reviewed. It does not reach EU, UK, EFTA or SADC origins. The plan is structured to remain viable without it |
|
Currency movement on imported kernels |
High |
Medium |
The import portion is dollar-denominated. Mitigated by forward cover on contracted volumes |
|
Working capital exceeds the facility |
Medium |
High |
Working capital reaches R25069516 against a R26 000 000 facility. Mitigated by 42-day kernel stock rather than a full season, and by retaining earnings |
|
Undeclared allergen incident |
Low |
Severe |
Peanut is a declared major allergen; an undeclared allergen is as reportable as a mycotoxin exceedance. Mitigated by dedicated lines and R146 labelling control |
|
Electricity cost and supply |
High |
Medium |
Roasting and grinding are energy intensive at R1 180 a tonne. Standby generation is budgeted at R1 600 000 |
|
Second shift started before demand exists |
Medium |
Medium |
Adds R2 700 000 of fixed cost. Mitigated by the Year 2 gate requiring contracted volume |
D.1 Pre-committed trigger points
|
Point |
Trigger |
Committed response |
|---|---|---|
|
Commissioning |
Aflatoxin results not consistently below 4 ppb on trial batches |
Do not commence commercial production. The internal limit is the control, not the regulatory one |
|
Before drawdown |
Less than 70% of Year 1 kernel requirement contracted |
Defer construction. A plant without qualified supply cannot control the risk that defines it |
|
Before drawdown |
Less than 50% of Year 1 volume committed to private label |
Defer. Own-brand listings take longer than the plant takes to build |
|
Month 6 of trading |
Intake rejection above 6% of certified deliveries |
Re-audit the supplier base. Rejection at that level signals a sourcing failure, not bad luck |
|
End of Year 1 |
Volume below 986 t |
Engage lenders before the second shift is committed, not after |
|
Any batch |
A release test above the internal limit |
Hold, investigate and widen the sampling. Never release against a single passing re-test |
|
Any time |
Own-brand share below 35% by Year 3 |
The margin improvement in this plan depends on the mix shift; review listings and trade investment |