SA Best Peanut Butter Business Plan — Key Assumptions

Every volume, kernel price, selling price, cost and funding assumption behind the model, and those most in need of verification.

Key Assumptions

Jump to section
On this page

  • 14.1 Volume, mix and pricing
  • 14.2 Capital, cost and funding
  • 14.3 Assumptions most in need of independent verification

14.1 Volume, mix and pricing

Assumption

Year 1

Year 5

Basis

Tonnes produced

900

2 150

7.8% of a national market of 27 641 t at maturity

Installed capacity

1 215 t, one shift

2 248 t, two shifts

Second shift added in Year 2

Capacity utilisation

74.1%

95.6%

Own-brand share of volume

30%

49%

The mix shift that carries the margin improvement

Own brand 400 g jar

R69.50/kg

R88.42/kg

Escalated at 6.2%; retail shelf is R97.50 to R137.50/kg

Private label

R54.50/kg

R69.34/kg

The retailer owns the brand

Blended selling price

R56.16/kg

R75.22/kg

Rises faster than 6.2% because the mix shifts to own brand

Kernel purchase price

R27 900/t

R35 508/t

Escalated at 6.8% — faster than selling prices

Recipe ratio

0.905 t kernel per t product

0.905

Added oil, sugar, salt and stabiliser offset the roasting and blanching loss

Intake rejection

3.8%

3.8%

On certified kernels; 11.5% on commodity grade

Effective kernel cost

R26 247/t

R34 148/t

45.4% of revenue at maturity

Contribution per tonne

R13 515

R18 723

25.2% of revenue at Year 1 prices

Trade spend on own brand

8.5% of own-brand revenue

8.5%

Separate from the R1 680 000 brand-building line in fixed costs

14.2 Capital, cost and funding

Assumption

Value

Basis

Processing lines — roasting, grinding, filling

R19 100 000

Roasting and blanching, grinding and homogenising, jar and pail filling

Optical sorting and aflatoxin laboratory

R8 300 000

17.5% of capital, bought for food safety rather than product quality

Building fit-out and conditioned storage

R8 700 000

Food-grade finishes; aflatoxin develops in poor storage

Utilities, warehouse, generation and inspection

R7 700 000

Steam, compressed air, racking, standby generation, metal detection and X-ray

Systems, professional fees and commissioning

R3 600 000

Traceability and ERP over five years; fees and validation over ten

Total capital expenditure

R47 400 000

Second shift capital, Year 2

R3 400 000

Adds R2 700 000 of annual fixed cost

Working capital at launch

R16 400 000

Kernel stock and finished goods

Retail listing fees and launch trade

R3 600 000

Listings are bought, not won

Pre-operational, brand and certification

R6 720 000

Charged to Year 1 below EBITDA

Total funding requirement

R74 120 000

Fixed cash costs, one shift

R15 690 142

Escalated at 5.5%

Promoter and investor equity

R33 120 000

44.7% of the requirement

DFI facility and senior debt

R41 000 000

Eight years at 11.42% with a one-year capital moratorium

Working capital facility

R26 000 000

Committed at drawdown; drawn to R25 689 744

Corporate tax

27% with assessed losses carried forward

Section 20 limitation applied; first charge in Year 4

Debtor / kernel stock / finished goods / creditor days

48 / 42 / 24 / 46

Retail chains pay in 48 days

Exit multiple

7.0x Year 5 EBITDA

Branded food asset in a defensive category

14.3 Assumptions most in need of independent verification

Assumption

Modelled

Verification required

Consequence if wrong

Certified kernels at R27 900 a tonne

Escalated at 6.8% a year

Firm supplier quotations with certificates of analysis, before construction

Kernels are 45.4% of revenue. A 12% move is worth R17.6m of Year 5 EBITDA

Retail listings winnable at the assumed prices

Own brand at 30% rising to 49% of volume

Private label agreements and own-brand listing presentations before drawdown

An 8% price shortfall removes R12.4m of Year 5 EBITDA. Without listings the plant sells at food service prices

2 150 tonnes at maturity

7.8% of the national market

Category share analysis and committed volume by channel

Break-even is 1 161 t on one shift. A 15% shortfall removes R4.2m

Aflatoxin control at 3.8% intake rejection

On certified kernels

Supplier audit history and pre-shipment test records

A three-point movement is worth R5.3m of Year 5 EBITDA

FSSC 22000 achievable before first production

Two-month certification phase

Pre-assessment against the scheme before construction completes

Without it the plant is limited to food service and industrial channels

Working capital at 15.5% of revenue

48 debtor days, 42 kernel days

Terms confirmed with retail customers and kernel suppliers

The facility is drawn to R25 689 744 against R26 000 000 committed

The 20% import duty holds

Granted 24 July 2026

Monitor the ITAC review cycle and the groundnut rebate investigation

Worth about R13.1m a year of protection, and it does not reach EU, UK, EFTA or SADC

The list is ordered by consequence. The first two determine whether the business earns a margin at all, and both are settled before construction for the cost of professional time. The third and fourth determine whether the plant fills itself and holds its control programme. The last three determine the financing structure and the competitive backdrop.