SA Best Peanut Butter Business Plan — Key Assumptions
Every volume, kernel price, selling price, cost and funding assumption behind the model, and those most in need of verification.
Key Assumptions
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice and Basis of Preparation
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Aflatoxin: The Question That Defines the Business
- 3. Market, Products and Pricing
- 4. Regulation and Food Safety
- 5. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 6. Operations
- 7. Financial Plan
- 8. Break-Even and Debt Service
- 9. Investment Analysis
- 10. Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis
- 11. Risk Analysis
- 12. Implementation Roadmap
- 13. Key Performance Indicators
- 14. Key Assumptions
- 15. Conclusion and Recommendation
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Volume, Kernel and Cost Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding, Debt and Working Capital Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
- 14.1 Volume, mix and pricing
- 14.2 Capital, cost and funding
- 14.3 Assumptions most in need of independent verification
14.1 Volume, mix and pricing
|
Assumption |
Year 1 |
Year 5 |
Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Tonnes produced |
900 |
2 150 |
7.8% of a national market of 27 641 t at maturity |
|
Installed capacity |
1 215 t, one shift |
2 248 t, two shifts |
Second shift added in Year 2 |
|
Capacity utilisation |
74.1% |
95.6% |
|
|
Own-brand share of volume |
30% |
49% |
The mix shift that carries the margin improvement |
|
Own brand 400 g jar |
R69.50/kg |
R88.42/kg |
Escalated at 6.2%; retail shelf is R97.50 to R137.50/kg |
|
Private label |
R54.50/kg |
R69.34/kg |
The retailer owns the brand |
|
Blended selling price |
R56.16/kg |
R75.22/kg |
Rises faster than 6.2% because the mix shifts to own brand |
|
Kernel purchase price |
R27 900/t |
R35 508/t |
Escalated at 6.8% — faster than selling prices |
|
Recipe ratio |
0.905 t kernel per t product |
0.905 |
Added oil, sugar, salt and stabiliser offset the roasting and blanching loss |
|
Intake rejection |
3.8% |
3.8% |
On certified kernels; 11.5% on commodity grade |
|
Effective kernel cost |
R26 247/t |
R34 148/t |
45.4% of revenue at maturity |
|
Contribution per tonne |
R13 515 |
R18 723 |
25.2% of revenue at Year 1 prices |
|
Trade spend on own brand |
8.5% of own-brand revenue |
8.5% |
Separate from the R1 680 000 brand-building line in fixed costs |
14.2 Capital, cost and funding
|
Assumption |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Processing lines — roasting, grinding, filling |
R19 100 000 |
Roasting and blanching, grinding and homogenising, jar and pail filling |
|
Optical sorting and aflatoxin laboratory |
R8 300 000 |
17.5% of capital, bought for food safety rather than product quality |
|
Building fit-out and conditioned storage |
R8 700 000 |
Food-grade finishes; aflatoxin develops in poor storage |
|
Utilities, warehouse, generation and inspection |
R7 700 000 |
Steam, compressed air, racking, standby generation, metal detection and X-ray |
|
Systems, professional fees and commissioning |
R3 600 000 |
Traceability and ERP over five years; fees and validation over ten |
|
Total capital expenditure |
R47 400 000 |
|
|
Second shift capital, Year 2 |
R3 400 000 |
Adds R2 700 000 of annual fixed cost |
|
Working capital at launch |
R16 400 000 |
Kernel stock and finished goods |
|
Retail listing fees and launch trade |
R3 600 000 |
Listings are bought, not won |
|
Pre-operational, brand and certification |
R6 720 000 |
Charged to Year 1 below EBITDA |
|
Total funding requirement |
R74 120 000 |
|
|
Fixed cash costs, one shift |
R15 690 142 |
Escalated at 5.5% |
|
Promoter and investor equity |
R33 120 000 |
44.7% of the requirement |
|
DFI facility and senior debt |
R41 000 000 |
Eight years at 11.42% with a one-year capital moratorium |
|
Working capital facility |
R26 000 000 |
Committed at drawdown; drawn to R25 689 744 |
|
Corporate tax |
27% with assessed losses carried forward |
Section 20 limitation applied; first charge in Year 4 |
|
Debtor / kernel stock / finished goods / creditor days |
48 / 42 / 24 / 46 |
Retail chains pay in 48 days |
|
Exit multiple |
7.0x Year 5 EBITDA |
Branded food asset in a defensive category |
14.3 Assumptions most in need of independent verification
|
Assumption |
Modelled |
Verification required |
Consequence if wrong |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Certified kernels at R27 900 a tonne |
Escalated at 6.8% a year |
Firm supplier quotations with certificates of analysis, before construction |
Kernels are 45.4% of revenue. A 12% move is worth R17.6m of Year 5 EBITDA |
|
Retail listings winnable at the assumed prices |
Own brand at 30% rising to 49% of volume |
Private label agreements and own-brand listing presentations before drawdown |
An 8% price shortfall removes R12.4m of Year 5 EBITDA. Without listings the plant sells at food service prices |
|
2 150 tonnes at maturity |
7.8% of the national market |
Category share analysis and committed volume by channel |
Break-even is 1 161 t on one shift. A 15% shortfall removes R4.2m |
|
Aflatoxin control at 3.8% intake rejection |
On certified kernels |
Supplier audit history and pre-shipment test records |
A three-point movement is worth R5.3m of Year 5 EBITDA |
|
FSSC 22000 achievable before first production |
Two-month certification phase |
Pre-assessment against the scheme before construction completes |
Without it the plant is limited to food service and industrial channels |
|
Working capital at 15.5% of revenue |
48 debtor days, 42 kernel days |
Terms confirmed with retail customers and kernel suppliers |
The facility is drawn to R25 689 744 against R26 000 000 committed |
|
The 20% import duty holds |
Granted 24 July 2026 |
Monitor the ITAC review cycle and the groundnut rebate investigation |
Worth about R13.1m a year of protection, and it does not reach EU, UK, EFTA or SADC |
The list is ordered by consequence. The first two determine whether the business earns a margin at all, and both are settled before construction for the cost of professional time. The third and fourth determine whether the plant fills itself and holds its control programme. The last three determine the financing structure and the competitive backdrop.