Green Master Vegetables Business Plan — Executive Summary
Irrigated vegetable production in Limpopo: R12.81m deployed, 45 hectares by Year 5, R20.81m revenue at a 16.4% EBITDA margin.
Executive Summary
Jump to section
- Overview & contents
- i. Important Notice
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Why Limpopo
- 3. The Market and the Commission Problem
- 4. Water: The Binding Constraint
- 5. Open Field Versus Tunnels
- 6. Crop Plan and Rotation
- 7. SWOT and Competitive Position
- 8. Route to Market
- 9. Unit Economics
- 10. The Five-Year Build and Its Gates
- 11. Funding
- 12. People and Operations
- 13. Certification and Compliance
- 14. Financial Projections
- 15. Break-Even
- 16. Sensitivity and Scenarios
- 17. Risk Management
- 18. Implementation Timeline
- 19. Returns
- 20. Key Performance Indicators
- 21. Key Assumptions
- 22. Conclusion
- A. Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Summary
- B. Appendix B: Capital Schedules
- C. Appendix C: Funding and Debt Schedules
- D. Appendix D: Risk Register
- E. Appendix E: Glossary
- 1.1 The proposition
- 30.7 ha
- 1.2 Four things an investor must understand
- 1.3 Headline numbers
- 1.4 Investment conclusion
1.1 The proposition
Green Master Vegetables is an irrigated vegetable enterprise in Limpopo. It begins with 8 hectares, 7 open field and 1 under tunnel, and grows to 45 hectares by Year 5, of which 4.5 are tunnels.
Output rises from 401 to 3 188 tonnes a year, taking revenue from R2.05 million to R20.81 million at an EBITDA margin of 16.4 per cent. Total capital deployed is R12.81 million, of which the founder contributes R1.95 million and R3.50 million is targeted as non-repayable grant through the Blended Finance Scheme.
|
R20.81m Year 5 revenue |
R3.42m Year 5 EBITDA |
16.4% EBITDA margin |
30.7 haBreak-even area |
1.2 Four things an investor must understand
- A tunnel hectare earns R1 460 000 of gross margin; an open-field hectare earns R53 100. That is a difference of 27.5 times. Tunnels cost roughly 7.1 times as much to establish, so the return on establishment capital still favours them heavily, 317 per cent against 82 per cent. Section 5 sets out why the plan nonetheless keeps most of its area open, and what would change that.
- Break-even is 30.7 hectares against a Year 5 plan of 45 once finance cost is included. The farm does not cover its fixed cost base until Year 3. Years 1 and 2 are funded establishment, not trading.
- Market commission is the third largest cost in the business. At R1.49 million in Year 5 it exceeds fertiliser. Shifting from 86.0 per cent to 58.0 per cent of volume sold through market agents is the single most valuable commercial project in the plan, worth roughly R47 000 for every percentage point moved.
- Fresh produce prices are brutally volatile and largely outside the farmer’s control. A 25 per cent price fall is modelled in Section 16 and it takes Year 5 EBITDA to minus R1.78 million. That is not a remote scenario in this market.
1.3 Headline numbers
|
R million unless stated |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hectares under production |
8.0 |
14.5 |
24.0 |
34.5 |
45.0 |
|
of which tunnels |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
4.5 |
|
Tonnes produced |
401 |
802 |
1 511 |
2 303 |
3 188 |
|
Sold via market agents |
86.0% |
80.0% |
72.0% |
64.0% |
58.0% |
|
Market-equivalent value |
2.27 |
4.60 |
9.16 |
14.68 |
21.40 |
|
Direct-channel premium |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.20 |
0.47 |
0.90 |
|
Gross sales |
2.29 |
4.67 |
9.36 |
15.15 |
22.30 |
|
Less commission and agent levy |
(0.23) |
(0.44) |
(0.79) |
(1.13) |
(1.49) |
|
Net revenue |
2.05 |
4.23 |
8.57 |
14.03 |
20.81 |
|
Direct production costs |
(1.31) |
(2.73) |
(5.26) |
(8.37) |
(12.09) |
|
Gross margin |
0.74 |
1.50 |
3.31 |
5.65 |
8.72 |
|
Fixed costs |
(1.13) |
(1.92) |
(2.98) |
(4.11) |
(5.30) |
|
EBITDA |
(0.39) |
(0.42) |
0.33 |
1.54 |
3.42 |
|
EBITDA margin |
-19.0% |
-10.1% |
3.8% |
11.0% |
16.4% |
|
Profit / (loss) after tax |
(0.81) |
(1.18) |
(0.83) |
0.08 |
1.58 |
|
Closing cash |
0.59 |
0.88 |
1.54 |
1.04 |
1.38 |
1.4 Investment conclusion
|
Measure |
Value |
Basis |
|---|---|---|
|
Founder equity |
R1.95m |
At inception |
|
Grant funding targeted |
R3.50m |
Blended Finance Scheme, Years 1 and 3; non-repayable |
|
Loans and facilities |
R9.49m |
Production credit, asset finance and Land Bank facilities |
|
Year 5 EBITDA |
R3.42m |
At a 16.4% margin |
|
Owner’s funds at Year 5 |
R4.30m |
Net asset value; the founder holds all of it |
|
Return on founder equity |
17.1% |
R1.95m becomes R4.30m, a 2.20x multiple |
|
Return excluding the grant benefit |
-16.4% |
If the R3.50m of grant had instead been debt |
|
Project IRR |
23.4% |
On free cash flow with a terminal value of R17.11m |
|
Return on capital deployed |
26.7% |
Year 5 EBITDA on R12.80m |
|
First profitable year |
Year 4 |
EBITDA turns positive in Year 3 |