NexaWave Fibre Networks — Industry & Market Analysis

The South African fibre-to-the-home market, the homes-passed and penetration dynamics and the market sizing underpinning NexaWave.

NexaWave Fibre Networks Business PlanSection 4 › Industry & Market Analysis

Section 4 · Business Plan

Industry & Market Analysis

The South African fibre-to-the-home market, the homes-passed and penetration dynamics and the market sizing underpinning NexaWave.

The South African fibre market

South Africa has built one of Africa’s most advanced fibre markets.
As of 2025 the largest FNOs collectively pass approximately 6.1
million homes
, led by Vumatel/Maziv (≈2.6 million including
Herotel) and Openserve (≈1.45 million), with MetroFibre, Frogfoot,
Vodafibre, Fibertime and others making up the balance. National FTTH/B
subscriptions reached 3.01 million in 2025, up 22% year-on-year, and
urban FTTH penetration now exceeds 20% in the major metros.

Figure 2
Figure 2 — SA FTTH homes passed by network operator, 2025 (≈6.1m national total)

Subscription growth has been the standout story: FTTH subscriptions
rose from 1.49 million in 2023 to 2.47 million in 2024 (+65%) and to
3.01 million in 2025. The structural gap that underpins NexaWave’s
thesis is the distance between coverage and adoption — only
17.4% of South African households report fixed internet access
at home
(Stats SA GHS 2024), even as fixed-broadband
subscriptions grew 19.3% to 3.26 million. Millions of passed homes
remain unconnected, and millions more remain unpassed.

Figure 3
Figure 3 — National FTTH/B subscription growth, 2022–2025

Structural demand drivers

  • Data-consumption growth. Streaming, cloud,
    remote work, online education, e-commerce and emerging AI workloads
    drive relentless bandwidth demand; fibre is the only medium that scales
    symmetrically to meet it.
  • The coverage–adoption gap. With home internet
    penetration at 17.4% against 6.1m homes passed, the near-term growth
    lever is connecting passed homes, not only passing new ones — favouring
    operators with dense, well-located footprints.
  • Township white space. Vumatel reports about half
    its network is now in previously under-served areas; low-cost products
    (Vuma Key at R99/month, Fibertime at ~R5/day) prove affordable-fibre
    demand is real and large.
  • Copper decline. Telkom’s copper shutdown and the
    obsolescence of legacy DSL push residual fixed-line demand onto fibre
    and fixed-wireless.
  • Policy tailwinds. SA Connect, the modernised
    Broadband Infraco national backbone (launched Oct 2025) and municipal
    digital-inclusion mandates create partnership and anchor-tenancy
    opportunities.
  • Economic multiplier. World Bank research links a
    10% rise in broadband penetration to ≈1.38% GDP growth in developing
    economies — the basis of the development-finance investment
    case.

Market sizing — TAM, SAM, SOM

Figure 4
Figure 4 — Market sizing: total, serviceable and obtainable market (homes-passed basis)
Layer Definition Size Basis
TAM SA households in fibre-viable areas ≈11.0m homes ≈18.0m households × fibre-viable share
SAM Homes economically passable by open-access FTTH over the plan horizon ≈8.5m homes Metro + secondary + viable township density
SOM NexaWave FY2031 homes passed 2.8m homes passed / 1.45m connected ≈33% of SAM passed; national footprint overbuild + Reach
ASSUMPTION FLAG

The SOM is ambitious relative to the market structure. Reaching 2.8m
homes passed would make NexaWave larger than Openserve is today and
comparable to Vumatel/Maziv — as a new entrant, in five years, in a
market where the incumbents are themselves accelerating (Vodacom’s Maziv
stake carries expanded capex commitments). The plan should be read as
requiring both flawless execution and a genuine cost or segment
advantage; the township-affordability positioning is the intended source
of that advantage, and its success is the plan’s central commercial
uncertainty.

Operational benchmarking against the market

NexaWave’s targets can be sanity-checked against the disclosed
operating metrics of established FNOs. The comparison shows where the
plan is consistent with the market and where it is more aggressive.

Metric Vumatel/Maziv Openserve NexaWave FY2031 target
Homes passed ≈2.04m (2.6m incl. Herotel) ≈1.45m 2.8m
Homes connected ≈864k ≈730k 1.45m
Connectivity (penetration) ≈42% ≈50.4% 51.8%
ISP partners 75+ Multiple (wholesale) 75+ target
Years to reach scale ≈9 (from 2014) Incumbent (legacy) 5 (from close)
Positioning Metro + Reach National reach Township-first overbuild

The plan’s penetration target (51.8%) is credible — it sits between
Vumatel and Openserve. The homes-passed target (2.8m) is where the
ambition concentrates: it implies building in five years what took the
market leader roughly nine, from a standing start. This is the
plan’s defining stretch, and it is why funding continuity and build
velocity dominate the risk register.

Competitive & consumer sentiment

Consumer research and community discussion consistently favour the
open-access model: users value ISP choice, symmetrical speeds, low
latency and competitive wholesale-driven pricing, and express
frustration with legacy telecom monopolies. This sentiment is the
structural tailwind behind open-access competition. For a wholesale FNO
it cuts two ways — it validates the model NexaWave is building, but it
also means consumers are loyal to the open-access category, not
to any single network
; on an overbuilt street, penetration
accrues to whoever passed the home with the best-priced, best-served ISP
ecosystem, making footprint selection and ISP relationships
decisive.

Confidential — this business plan is provided to prospective investors and lenders for evaluation purposes only and may not be reproduced or distributed without the written consent of NexaWave Fibre Networks (Pty) Ltd.